Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 619

The megatrend you simply cannot ignore

Two and a half years have passed since financial markets, and the world at large, woke up to a new technological break-through labeled Generative Artificial Intelligence.

By now, it seems initial investor euphoria has been replaced with scepticism about the importance of the new technology promise. It's reflected in share prices dipping lower and not necessarily revisiting the levels that featured at the start of 2025.

Look no further than HMC Capital's DigiCo Infrastructure REIT (ASX: DGT) spin-off which made its ASX debut on 13 December last year on a minor discount to the $5 per share IPO pricing. It's share price is now trading closer to $3 - a concrete example of how sentiment has turned for what seemed the no-brainer momentum trend to jump on over the past two years.

From where I am sitting and observing, it seems many investors would rather buy into Aurizon Holdings [AZJ], Iluka Resources [ILU], Lendlease [LLC] or Monash IVF [MVF], and wait for better times to arrive for such market laggards, than grab the opportunity in less ebullient share prices from obvious AI beneficiaries.

Ironically, today's wait-and-see approach in Australia contravenes the rush by astute investors globally, including private equity and large pension funds, to grab their slice of what is promised to deliver the next economic and societal transformation.

So why isn't there a lot more local enthusiasm for owning shares in Goodman Group (ASX: GMG) and other AI beneficiaries on the ASX?

Reasons to be sceptical

It's not as if the promise of a different world tomorrow hasn't arrived previously on Australian shores, and on most occasions the initial hype has quickly turned to dust, or the true winners are mostly listed overseas. Think 3D printing and legalised cannabis as examples of the former and smartphones and social media platforms for the latter.

Online shopping and retailing has delivered on their promise of transformative migration, but for investors there are at least as many success stories as disappointments.

Those old enough might still have nightmares about that Great Promise of the late 90s: the Internet.

In between, of course, we also witnessed the emergence and implosion of the Commodities Super Cycle thesis, which got interrupted by the Global Financial Crisis (late 2007-March 2009) but then died a silent death in 2012.

GenAI, carried by chip manufacturers and megacap companies in the US and mostly by data centre builders and operators on the ASX, is now in its third year, which already is a long time in share market terms. Share prices in Goodman and the like more than doubled from the lows in late 2022 into late-2024/at the start of this calendar year.

So with share prices not the cheapest in an expensively priced market and with critics reminding us many hundreds of billions of investments into GenAI have yet to deliver the killer app everybody wants to purchase, maybe common sense dictates the time to chase this trend has now well and truly passed?

As per always, it all depends on how best to assess this new phenomenon.

GenAI is developing a brave new world

According to former Google CEO and Executive Chairman, Eric Schmidt, the development of GenAI is still only embryonic, with many more stages of development on the horizon, and truly transformative outcomes along the way.

In a recent TED Talk interview (link below) released in April, Schmidt argued the advent of AI is, contrary to investor hesitance, still "wildly underhyped" as general understanding is not yet fully appreciative of what is yet to be achieved through this new technology.

The emergence of non-human intelligence, which is what AI essentially embodies, is likely to turn into the most significant development for the last 500 or even 1000 years, he boldly suggests, leaving all other technological revolutions throughout that period in its shadow.

I encourage investors to watch the interview. Technologist turned AI evangelist Schmidt is far from a lonely voice on this matter. In October last year, FNArena interviewed Nilesh Jasani, who runs his own global innovation fund (link included below). The following paragraphs are from Jasani's latest update for investors:

"Generative AI now orchestrates half the product recommendations on the internet, and a quarter of travel bookings start with a chatbot. Governments, not just hyperscalers, are pouring hundreds of billions of dollars into data-center infrastructure. Money that once paved highways now paves inference lanes.

"As consumers, what we buy, how we buy it, and even why we buy it is being rewritten. A decade from now, 10-20% of global consumption could be in products and services that barely exist today. The world around us is changing at a speed that is difficult to comprehend. It is not our intention here to repeat the refrains sung in every journal and presentation. But there are shifts occurring that are often under-discussed in their magnitude. Every major number hinted at in this section would have been a revolution on its own. Here, they are happening simultaneously and building on each other.

"Not just the Internet is in flux or collectively global consumers, corporates, and governments are spending on a new sector like nothing ever seen, but the capabilities and use cases continue to explode in a way unimaginable even a few months prior. Cars are delivering themselves. The skies are witnessing the first flying taxis. Machines can talk in human languages and process vision perfectly: these feats are so staggering that after Elon Musk, Jensen Huang has also felt the need to state that Robotics could become the biggest industry humanity has ever built.

"One can keep going breathless about the potential in diagnostics, or drug discovery, or in climate management, or in material sciences, or in finance. The opera approaches its crescendo. The world is forging tools so powerful they change the ask of humanity itself.

"We can chase every candlewisp of price volatility, or we can learn to breathe through it. The real risks are not recurring double-digit market corrections every few quarters. The real risk is dedicating one's attention to managing them and, in the process, straying away from truly historic real-world transformation."

The message from both Schmidt and Jasani, and from many others, is those investors who keep thinking this boat has sailed, or share prices are too expensive, or there's risk for another sell-off, are likely to miss out on a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to be on the right side of history in the making.

Of course, there will be winners and losers, as well as many grand successes and failures. But no matter what type of investor you are, or what horizon your portfolio is set-up for, if GenAI reaches only a quarter of the size predicted by these experts, it will be impossible to escape its impacts on life, societies, economies, businesses, and financial markets.

From this perspective, achieving a better understanding of what is this new technology, and what is its promise, is no longer a choice for active investors.

It's a necessity.

GenAI is electrifying global efficiency

As developments accumulate in quick succession, it is increasingly dawning upon AI afficionados any comparison with the smart phone, the Internet, or even personal computers is a sign of not genuinely appreciating the transformation that has already started.

GenAI's transformative powers are so broad-based across segments, sections and sectors, a more apposite comparison is with the advent of electricity in the early 1900s. By 1920 about 35% of US homes were electrified, giving birth to new industries manufacturing refrigerators, vacuum cleaners, washing machines and radios.

By the end of that decade, that percentage had risen to 68% (90% for the major cities), fueling a consumer spending boom that supported a golden era for equities. Yes, that ultimately ended with an historic disaster at the turn of that decade, but should one worry about such an outcome already?

More than one hundred years later, the development and adoption of GenAI is occurring at much faster, break-neck pace. Its impact on businesses and the economy will be equally broad-based, but profoundly different.

My personal LinkedIn feed suggests people are embracing new AI tools with seldom witnessed gusto. HR departments are receiving perfect job applications. Complaints are drafted in perfect legal lingo. AI is creating high-quality presentation slides, writing standard emails and advising on where to holiday and which recipe or daily exercise seems best.

Investment banking and consultancies are lauding the rapid execution time, without the need for hiring more staff. Fund managers are stunned by the quick execution and the detailed information gathering to support their research.

My prediction is GenAI will be a lot more mentioned throughout the upcoming August reporting season. Critics waiting for the next killer app are missing the point; large corporations like CommBank (ASX: CBA) and Telstra ASX: TLS) await the opportunity to become a whole lot leaner and more efficient, which means higher margins, higher profits and (potentially) higher dividends for shareholders.

If investors can be convinced such margin increases are sustainable, this also translates into structurally higher valuations for companies that successfully integrate this new technology throughout their operations. Others will still be forced to make the investment, lest they be sidelined by a successful competitor or new market disruptor.

Nothing in history ever moves in an uninterrupted, straight trajectory, and it is most likely GenAI won't do it either. This is a positive, as it gives investors time and opportunity to read up and to study, and to get truly acquainted with what tomorrow's world might look like, starting from today's likely winners and opportunities.

Time to get crackin', or to repeat the advice by Eric Schmidt: don't waste this unique opportunity.

In the same vein, if GenAI truly is a once-in-a-lifetime phenomenon that is changing the world as profoundly as now is believed, there will be an ongoing conga line of opportunities (and misses) for many years to follow.

This still is not an excuse to risk missing out altogether.

 

Rudi Filapek-Vandyck is Editor at the FNArena newsletter, see www.fnarena.com. This article has been prepared for educational purposes and is not meant to be a substitute for tailored financial advice.

 

  •   9 July 2025
  • 6
  •      
  •   
6 Comments
Stephen E
July 12, 2025

Think you're right on megatrend though disagree on Digico as a way to play. Company slapped together by investment bankers in a hurry, buying assets at exorbitatnt prices, and generated fees back to parent (of course).

Others more prospective.

Rudi
July 14, 2025

Hi Stephen, I principally mentioned DigiCo as one example of share prices trading below levels seen in late 2024/early 2025. My personal favourites are NextDC and Goodman Group, but there's more on offer, and there will be more beneficiaries coming out of the woodwork in the months and years to follow.

Manfred S
July 12, 2025

I find it difficult to buy megatrends - it always feels like you're paying up for hope. I'd rather own a fund manager which invests in broader US tech or an ETF that does similar - a basket approach in case it is what it's cracked up to be.

Rudi
July 14, 2025

Hi Manfred, this latest industrial revolution is the real McCoy and whether you do it through ETFs, a fund manager, locally listed beneficiaries or on international markets, my prediction is you will --one way or another-- be forced to pay attention and integrate this into your strategies and portfolio(s). The one note to make on valuation is that whatever looks fully priced in the here and now is actually a bargain later on if/when megatrend growth comes through. And that's the key mental barrier investors have to overcome, time and again.

Phil
July 12, 2025

Rudi, do you have insight into the supply side of datacentres, especially in the US?

Rudi
July 14, 2025

Hi Phil, FNArena built a designated section for this new megatrend, so as you probably can imagine, the risk of overbuilding capacity is one item that has our focus. At the moment such risk does not appear to be on the horizon. Yes, capacity is being financed and planned, and a lot of it too, but newly built data centres don't appear overnight and then there's the reason as to why this is a new megatrend; demand is exploding.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Corporate earnings show resilience against volatility but risks remain

The challenges with building a dividend portfolio

On the virtue of owning wonderful businesses like CBA

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

What if Australia’s golden age of dividends is ending? Rather than overhaul your portfolio, it may be worth considering where new capital can work harder. I discuss four income strategies and the trade-offs behind each.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The ageing ‘crisis’ has not and will not happen

Rising age dependency is frequently treated as a warning sign for economies. But when actual workforce participation is examined, a strikingly different picture emerges about ageing, productivity and economic sustainability.

Retirement

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Shares

Four charts that expose market concentration risk

Investors have recently been rewarded for backing market leaders, but history suggests this eventually comes at a cost. Now may be the time to review whether your portfolio is carrying unintended risks beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The case for gearing beyond property

Most Australians gear into property but ignore shares. That may be a mistake. Used carefully, geared equity strategies can enhance long-term returns, reduce cash tied up in growth assets and support retirement income goals.

Economy

Australia's $1 trillion debt pile

The headlines exclaiming that Australian government debt has hit A$1 trillion and US government debt has hit $40 trillion has turned heads, but how serious are they really? Will Australia's mix of debt create challenges?

Economy

Has 100 years of growth made us any happier?

For decades, GDP has been the benchmark for economic success, but has it made us materially happier? If happiness does not rise in lockstep with prosperity, are we overlooking what constitutes a successful society?

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.