Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 198

Three drivers of attractive infrastructure opportunities

Infrastructure has become a hot topic in recent months. Donald Trump has promised a US$1 trillion infrastructure investment programme, while in Indonesia immediately to our north, the Joko Widodo administration has committed to a doubling of infrastructure spending in 2017 compared with 2014.

Locally, the national political debate is escalating on the adequacy of South Australian and east coast electricity generation capacity, and how we might meet any shortfall. The latest plan from Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull explores a $2 billion expansion of the Snowy Hydro Scheme.

Increased investment in infrastructure is long overdue. This is true in both developed and emerging economies, and has become increasingly acute over the past 30 to 40 years. In the United States, for example, the recently released 2017 Infrastructure Report Card from the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) gave America’s infrastructure an overall score of D+, stating:

“… our nation is at a crossroads. Deteriorating infrastructure is impeding our ability to compete in the thriving global economy, and improvements are necessary to ensure our country is built for the future”.

ASCE estimates US$4.6 trillion is needed in US infrastructure investment between now and 2025, of which they estimate approximately US$2.5 trillion is funded, leaving a massive funding gap.

The main factors driving the need for investment

Three main factors drive the escalating need for infrastructure investment around the world:

1. Long-term chronic underspend

A 2015 study by the B20 (the business arm of the G20) estimated that by 2030 approximately US$60-70 trillion will need to be spent on infrastructure around the world just to keep up with demand. It believes only US$45 trillion will be funded, leaving a gap of US$15-20 trillion.

This spend is largely to bring existing assets up to standard and keep pace with growth, and would offer little expansion in the infrastructure stock.

2. A growing middle class, especially in emerging economies

The growth of a substantial middle class in emerging markets will demand not only more but better infrastructure to complement their improved living standards and increased disposable income.

3. Governments with limited funding capacity

Historically governments have been the primary provider of national infrastructure. However, in the post-GFC world, many governments are running substantial fiscal deficits and have fragile, highly geared, national balance sheets. Their ability to invest in public sector infrastructure is highly constrained. In fact, the demand to improve infrastructure comes at a time when governments’ funding ability is at its weakest in a longtime.

Enter the private investor

Infrastructure assets possess a number of attractive investment characteristics including:

  • long dated, resilient and visible cash flows
  • regulated or contracted earnings streams
  • monopolistic market position or high barriers to entry
  • attractive potential yield
  • inflation hedge within the business
  • low maintenance capital spend
  • largely fixed operating cost base
  • low volatility of earnings.

These characteristics are ideally suited to both the listed and unlisted infrastructure markets where the quality and predictability of earnings are highly valued. The public, or listed, market also offers liquidity which allows entry into or exit from an investment more easily than in the unlisted market.

A current example in NSW is the State Government privatising its electricity assets with the proceeds to be recycled into new infrastructure investment. The Government is entering long-term leases of the energy businesses Transgrid, Ausgrid and Endeavour. The major purchasers of these assets have been superannuation and unlisted infrastructure funds, with some involvement from listed market investors.

Given the popularity of infrastructure assets amongst unlisted investors, demand currently far outstrips supply, meaning that investors in an unlisted fund can be waiting on the sidelines for some time before a suitable asset is secured by their fund, and their cash deployed for investment.

Regulated v user-pay assets

An important definition in the world of infrastructure investing is the distinction between regulated and user-pay assets.

Regulated assets are the typical essential service utility such as gas, electricity and water companies. Given the natural monopoly position they enjoy, a free market economy will typically ‘regulate’ the returns they can earn and rates they charge customers.

In contrast, user-pay assets, such as airports, ports and toll roads, typically operate under the governance of a ‘concession deed’ with a government authority. It is this deed that determines the scope and scale of the business emanating from it.

This distinction offers a different investment profile. In the current environment of strong global growth, user-pay assets should do relatively better as they are better positioned to immediately benefit from increased demand and pass through any inflationary pressures. Alternatively, in an environment of sluggish global growth and falling interest rates, regulated utilities would be preferred as their defensive, safe haven characteristics become more highly valued by investors.

The global listed infrastructure market will grow rapidly over coming decades, along with its unlisted cousin. Public equity markets will form a crucial component in the funding solution for how the world meets its acute and rapidly growing infrastructure needs.

 

Greg Goodsell is Global Equity Strategist at 4D Infrastructure, a Bennelong boutique. This article is general information that does not consider the circumstances of any individual.


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Clime time: Taxing unrealised capital gains – is there a better idea?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.