Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 198

Three drivers of attractive infrastructure opportunities

Infrastructure has become a hot topic in recent months. Donald Trump has promised a US$1 trillion infrastructure investment programme, while in Indonesia immediately to our north, the Joko Widodo administration has committed to a doubling of infrastructure spending in 2017 compared with 2014.

Locally, the national political debate is escalating on the adequacy of South Australian and east coast electricity generation capacity, and how we might meet any shortfall. The latest plan from Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull explores a $2 billion expansion of the Snowy Hydro Scheme.

Increased investment in infrastructure is long overdue. This is true in both developed and emerging economies, and has become increasingly acute over the past 30 to 40 years. In the United States, for example, the recently released 2017 Infrastructure Report Card from the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) gave America’s infrastructure an overall score of D+, stating:

“… our nation is at a crossroads. Deteriorating infrastructure is impeding our ability to compete in the thriving global economy, and improvements are necessary to ensure our country is built for the future”.

ASCE estimates US$4.6 trillion is needed in US infrastructure investment between now and 2025, of which they estimate approximately US$2.5 trillion is funded, leaving a massive funding gap.

The main factors driving the need for investment

Three main factors drive the escalating need for infrastructure investment around the world:

1. Long-term chronic underspend

A 2015 study by the B20 (the business arm of the G20) estimated that by 2030 approximately US$60-70 trillion will need to be spent on infrastructure around the world just to keep up with demand. It believes only US$45 trillion will be funded, leaving a gap of US$15-20 trillion.

This spend is largely to bring existing assets up to standard and keep pace with growth, and would offer little expansion in the infrastructure stock.

2. A growing middle class, especially in emerging economies

The growth of a substantial middle class in emerging markets will demand not only more but better infrastructure to complement their improved living standards and increased disposable income.

3. Governments with limited funding capacity

Historically governments have been the primary provider of national infrastructure. However, in the post-GFC world, many governments are running substantial fiscal deficits and have fragile, highly geared, national balance sheets. Their ability to invest in public sector infrastructure is highly constrained. In fact, the demand to improve infrastructure comes at a time when governments’ funding ability is at its weakest in a longtime.

Enter the private investor

Infrastructure assets possess a number of attractive investment characteristics including:

  • long dated, resilient and visible cash flows
  • regulated or contracted earnings streams
  • monopolistic market position or high barriers to entry
  • attractive potential yield
  • inflation hedge within the business
  • low maintenance capital spend
  • largely fixed operating cost base
  • low volatility of earnings.

These characteristics are ideally suited to both the listed and unlisted infrastructure markets where the quality and predictability of earnings are highly valued. The public, or listed, market also offers liquidity which allows entry into or exit from an investment more easily than in the unlisted market.

A current example in NSW is the State Government privatising its electricity assets with the proceeds to be recycled into new infrastructure investment. The Government is entering long-term leases of the energy businesses Transgrid, Ausgrid and Endeavour. The major purchasers of these assets have been superannuation and unlisted infrastructure funds, with some involvement from listed market investors.

Given the popularity of infrastructure assets amongst unlisted investors, demand currently far outstrips supply, meaning that investors in an unlisted fund can be waiting on the sidelines for some time before a suitable asset is secured by their fund, and their cash deployed for investment.

Regulated v user-pay assets

An important definition in the world of infrastructure investing is the distinction between regulated and user-pay assets.

Regulated assets are the typical essential service utility such as gas, electricity and water companies. Given the natural monopoly position they enjoy, a free market economy will typically ‘regulate’ the returns they can earn and rates they charge customers.

In contrast, user-pay assets, such as airports, ports and toll roads, typically operate under the governance of a ‘concession deed’ with a government authority. It is this deed that determines the scope and scale of the business emanating from it.

This distinction offers a different investment profile. In the current environment of strong global growth, user-pay assets should do relatively better as they are better positioned to immediately benefit from increased demand and pass through any inflationary pressures. Alternatively, in an environment of sluggish global growth and falling interest rates, regulated utilities would be preferred as their defensive, safe haven characteristics become more highly valued by investors.

The global listed infrastructure market will grow rapidly over coming decades, along with its unlisted cousin. Public equity markets will form a crucial component in the funding solution for how the world meets its acute and rapidly growing infrastructure needs.


Greg Goodsell is Global Equity Strategist at 4D Infrastructure, a Bennelong boutique. This article is general information that does not consider the circumstances of any individual.


Leave a Comment:


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates


$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.


Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.