Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 370

Three new lessons about listed companies during COVID-19

As the world entered the uncharted territory of a global pandemic, so did the financial markets. Never before has there been an external shock that has been met with so much fiscal support from governments and monetary support from central banks.

There’s no doubt that this is providing a cushion at a macro level, and in Australia, a swift market downturn has been followed by a relatively strong upswing. But on closer inspection, there are still many variables that need to play out before we can draw conclusions about markets.

In the article below, we discuss three lessons learnt and what to expect in the unfolding reporting season.

1. The market doesn’t always reward performance

Many companies have been hit hard by the impacts of COVID-19, resulting in a rush to raise capital in an effort to create financial buffers to weather the crisis.

However, other companies appear to have resilient earnings and have not needed to undertake the discounted and sometimes heavily dilutive capital raisings that others have. Yet despite this comparative strength, some of these companies have not been rewarded by investors with a positive re-pricing, and in some cases have even experienced a sell-off.

An interesting example is IPH (ASX:IPH), a company that files patents and trademarks on a global basis. It has proven a relatively stable business over many years, has not commented on earnings during the last few months and has not raised equity.

With an expected 2021 EPS of 40c (pre-COVID, and essentially unchanged today), the stock has gone from 25x PE to around 18.5x PE. In volatile times, we would expect a higher rating for visible earnings, and while we do expect some weakness in patent filings going forward, we don’t believe that it would warrant such a downward price movement.

Furthermore, we believe the broader sectors of Mining and Mining Services should be given more recognition and higher ratings than they have been given over the past few months. Commodity prices have been strong for iron ore, gold and more recently base metals such as nickel and copper. Balance sheets in the sector remain strong and earnings visibility is as high as it’s been for many years.

As an example, NRW Holdings (ASX:NWH) will likely meet or exceed guidance and has a strong forward order book with exposure to sectors such as infrastructure, iron ore, gold and civil construction. It has a positive outlook that should make the market notice its resilience and visibility. The stock trades on a PE of 7.3x next year – we believe it could be as low as 10x if it meets its guidance and continues to have a positive outlook.

Similarly, Independence Group (ASX:IGO), which mines nickel and gold, will show a balance sheet with $500m+ of cash and investments and has beaten production forecasts. It pays a dividend and has growth options. It is on a 10% free cash flow yield. The company trades on an EBITDA multiple of around 5x. This appears cheap for a company exposed to the fast-growing electric vehicle sector which has significant demand for high quality nickel for its batteries.

We find that many strong cash generative businesses like these are simply not resonating in the current so called ‘melt-up’ in shares. Investors seem more focused on customer growth and revenue growth, as opposed to free cashflows and earnings.

2. Not all technology stocks are created equal

A big theme of the year has been the impact of technology stocks on the performance of the markets, both locally and in the US. While we don’t want to weigh in on whether there is a tech bubble in Australia, we do think there are pockets of investor mania in fintech and artificial intelligence, where the road to any meaningful cashflow or profit seems very far out.

The technology sector has been very strong, and we own a number of companies in this sector, but the key is to be selective. Many of these companies seem to be growing their shares on issue rather than their returns.

Subscriber numbers and Total Addressable Market (TAM) are interesting but we are wary about the 'me too' effect. Afterpay (ASX:APT) was the first significant, listed buy-now-pay-later provider and now there are seven listed providers, with more to come. There will be winners and losers in the fintech space and we focus on ensuring they have a pathway to sustainable profit and cashflow.

Another aspect to consider in the technology sector for Australia is that there are some big global peers with significant access to capital. By nature, the sector is fast moving, and as a result the barriers to entry can be quite low.

3. Institutional investors are important when times get tough

As a large institutional investor, we are often asked about the wisdom of discounted capital raises and their dilutive potential for smaller investors. 

Generally, when there is a strong share price performance from a company and it is ‘hot’ among investors, a company will capitalise on this and raise equity. Smaller (retail) investors will flock to the raising as the share price is going up. The reverse seems to be the case when an otherwise solid company is struggling, due to external factors, and the share price is weak. Smaller investors are less inclined to participate.

Overall, by the time a company comes to raise money, a large proportion has been de-risked by institutions, hence there may in some cases be an advantage for smaller investors. When a company needs equity in a short timeframe, it is not that feasible for a company to seek retail demand: their boards want some certainty of demand and success in a matter of hours.

The recent round of capital raisings, undertaken to provide companies with a buffer in the face of the pandemic, demonstrated the important part that professional investors play in the economy.


Register here to receive the Firstlinks weekly newsletter for free

Looking ahead: themes for coming results season

The majority of companies are maintaining or changing guidance, or completely withdrawing their outlook. Most market participants are aware that the earnings estimates are likely erroneous or simply stale.

Some sectors, such as travel and pockets of retail, remain very difficult to forecast. Companies like Flight Centre (ASX:FLT) and Webjet (ASX:WEB) face the near impossible task of predicting when international travel will resume and also when domestic travel returns to reasonable levels.

Many companies have either already strengthened their balance sheet or have stated that their capital position remains sound. The problem for both companies and investors is that balance sheets are a 'snapshot' and their level of soundness can be directly correlated to the ongoing duration of the pandemic. 

It is likely that some companies raised capital with a view that the pandemic would be near over by now, and hence may be forced to come back to the market for additional debt or capital.

Some themes worth noting:

  1. Companies will remain cautious so don’t expect guidance or outlook statements from the majority of companies.
  2. Potential ending of some fiscal stimulus measures such as JobKeeper will be at the forefront for some companies and investors.
  3. Check how the company has adapted to potential longer-term implications of this crisis? Issues like supply chains, online capability, remote working arrangements, appropriate gearing levels, customer concentration, rental arrangements and travel to name a few.

So, we aren’t expecting that the reporting season will be a disaster, but we do expect there will be some confronting news when investors see the actual numbers and the outlook.

 

Tim Canham and Wik Farwerck are Senior Portfolio Managers at First Sentier Investors (Australia), a sponsor of Firstlinks. This material contains general information only. It is not intended to provide you with financial product advice and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs.

For more articles and papers from First Sentier Investors, please click here.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Changing times as share investors settle in for the long haul

4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Five stock recoveries not hanging on COVID predictions

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.

Property

RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.

Shares

4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.

Shares

Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.

Shares

Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.

Superannuation

Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.