Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 443

It's time to assess your super fund’s carbon footprint

We now hear it from just about all corners of our industry - the race to net zero emissions is an investment thematic that can’t be ignored.

However, here in Australia (and many other parts of the world) investors can draw little confidence from the political environment.

Our government is willing to keep kicking the can down the road, begrudgingly agreeing to a net zero 2050 target with a pathway full of technological holes. The problem is 2050 is about 10 election cycles away.

So, we face a hugely-consequential economic transformation that’s not yet a priority for governments and oppositions.

Bigger than government

Despite the lack of political leadership, Australia is in fact doing reasonably well on the climate front. Emissions are falling at the total level, while emissions from electricity generation have halved from their peak. At one stage in September 2021, around 60% of Australia’s electricity demand was fulfilled by renewables.

But it is individuals and corporates responsible for this change, not governments. For families, not only does renewable energy make economic sense, but feeling good for our planet’s future is no doubt part of the motivation.

The same goes for corporates. Many of Australia’s largest companies (and largest emitters) have already adopted some very aggressive carbon reduction targets.

As an example, we recently met with Mineral Resources, which mines lithium and iron ore. Mineral Resources has scoped out over 80 Net Present Value positive projects that will help put it on its path to net zero by 2050, as it moves from a diesel-fueled mining company to a renewables-based electrified mining company.

Companies such as Amcor, CIMIC, Coles, RIO, Telstra and Woolworths have adopted targets of 50% or more carbon emissions reductions by 2030. Wesfarmers’ retail businesses (Bunnings, Kmart, Officeworks) are targeting net zero in 2030.

In some areas companies are literally falling over each other to make their businesses green. Aldi, Coles and Woolworths are all moving to 100% renewable electricity for their stores and distribution centres by 2025 or earlier. Charter Hall is looking for its buildings to go net zero by 2025, not 2050.

Overall, we estimate that approximately 75% of Australian ASX/S&P200 companies by market value have adopted net zero, carbon neutral or net positive carbon targets.

But a damaging carbon footprint remains in investment portfolios

Despite this positive progress, Australian and global companies have a long way to go.

Using Plato’s carbon database, we can assess the carbon footprint of leading investment indices. The chart below shows that if an investor placed $US1 million in an ASX/S&P200 index fund, the equity ownership share of those holdings was responsible for annual emissions of over 133 tonnes of carbon dioxide.

The Australian index is far more carbon intensive than the US or MSCI World markets, reflecting Australia’s industry mix, which is highly weighted to materials and energy stocks and relatively lowly weighted to information technology.

Index Carbon Footprint


ASX 200

S&P 500

MSCI World

Carbon Footprint (tonnes CO2e/USD $M invested)




As of June 30, 2021. Source: Plato, FactSet, MSCI, scope 1 and 2 emissions.

Using this information, we can also estimate the carbon footprint of a typical superannuation investment.

According to the latest information from the ASFA’s superannuation statistics, we find that a typical couple aged 60-64 has assets worth around $650,000. Using just the average exposure to listed equities and property, we estimate this equates to approximately 28 tonnes of CO2 equivalent per annum in emissions through their equity ownership of company emissions.

This is larger than the average emissions of typical Australian household, which sits at around 15-20 tonnes.

For perspective, 28 tonnes is equivalent to 63 return Sydney-Melbourne economy flights, 2.8 return economy flights Sydney-London, or 8.4 medium petrol cars driving around 12,000 kilometres per year.

Unlocking a ‘net zero now’ investment portfolio?

Plato has been able to achieve a net zero carbon footprint without using costly carbon credits in the portfolio of our Plato Global Net Zero Hedge Fund. This is through a combination of shorting high carbon emitting global stocks and going long stocks with below average carbon footprints.

There are also a growing number of other low carbon investment alternatives rapidly emerging in the broader listed and unlisted managed funds space.

Why? The sceptics might argue it’s opportunistic, but like the families and corporates, investors (and many investment managers) are growing more and more carbon conscious and the economics are growing more and more attractive.

An insight into the European market illustrates this, and perhaps provides an insight into why going ‘net zero now’ could be so lucrative for investors in the years ahead. Europe is the most advanced economic block when it comes to decarbonisation, so it provides a strong indication of what’s to come for the laggard economies, such as Australia.

You can see above (left of page), European capital has dominated flows into sustainable funds since 2018. The rest of the world remains markedly behind.

This is no surprise when comparing performance of high carbon intensity stocks versus low carbon intensity stocks in Europe after controlling for sectors. Right of page we see that in Europe high carbon intensity stocks within a sector have underperformed low carbon intensity stocks by cumulative more than 30%.

Remember, Europe has had a price on carbon since 2005. In a regulatory sense it is the most developed market globally when it comes to decarbonisation. This, along with the aforementioned proliferation of flows into sustainable funds has led to that significant outperformance seen by low carbon intensity stocks.

We compare this to the US (light green line) and there is little different between the performance of high carbon and low carbon stocks. However, the rest of the world has no choice but to catch up and we believe a similar market dynamic to what’s occurred in Europe will likely play out across the globe in the years ahead.

Action begins at home

Regardless of what our politicians do, the buck stops with all of us to help limit climate change. When a company or an individual makes an investment decision, be it for a new mine or office building or a new house or car, or even a new appliance, that decision is locking in future emissions for many years.

Indeed, we think the race to net zero will be the most important thematic for investment returns over the next 30 years, but we think the time to reach net zero in your investment portfolio can be now.


Dr Don Hamson is Managing Director at Plato Investment Management. Plato is affiliated with Pinnacle Investment Management, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

For more articles and papers from Pinnacle and its affiliates, click here.


January 31, 2022

I'd rather Fund Manager's stuck to their knitting and concentrated on getting the best returns for their customers, given the expensive, excessive fees some charge! Don't join the woke brigade!

SMSF Trustee
February 01, 2022

James, fund managers who take this issue seriously ARE focussing on returns for investors. Whether you like it or not, the world is moving against carbon emissions and anyone who owns assets that produce emissions is taking a risk. Don't you want your fundie to manage that risk? Or would you like to be stranded owning the last, worthless, coal mine in Australia?
This has nothing to do with "wokeness" and everything to do with maximising long run returns.

February 01, 2022

Last time I checked neither wind, solar, batteries or hydrogen were near to solving the emerging European energy crisis. Merkel's all but killed nuclear and now they burn Russian gas, coal, wood chip and oil. The "cart" is way ahead of the horse at this juncture, so let's respectfully disagree that some fund manager's are going a bit woke as the herd charges to "green" energy (at whatever cost). It doesn't mean I want my fund manager to. As Charlie Munger apparently once said: "Show me the incentive and I'll show you the outcome". The incentive for fund managers is to harness concerned investors and hence create "green, ethical" funds!

January 31, 2022

If, as you say, action begins at home, then why haven't you accounted for the significant home gardening services performed by most SMSF trustees (and members). Like planting a tree. Or lots of roses.

January 27, 2022

Let me think about that ... going short a carbon-emitting company is like buying a carbon offset. Doesn't strike me its like planting a tree or installing solar.

Don Hamson
January 29, 2022

Hi Joey. So ok we are not growing trees, but we are punishing high carbon emitters by selling their shares and putting downward pressure on their share prices. We also engage with companies like AGL to encourage them to have a fair dinkum plan to get to net zero. We need to get the companies to reduce their emissions, because there are only so many trees one can plant. If we can help make a company decide to install solar and reduce their emissions that is a win.


Leave a Comment:



Big Super’s asset allocation and future headwinds

Why ESG can still play a crucial role in investor portfolios

Mike Murray on watching for the changing narrative


Most viewed in recent weeks

Meg on SMSFs: Clearing up confusion on the $3 million super tax

There seems to be more confusion than clarity about the mechanics of how the new $3 million super tax is supposed to work. Here is an attempt to answer some of the questions from my previous work on the issue. 

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 566 with weekend update

Here are 10 rules for staying happy and sharp as we age, including socialise a lot, never retire, learn a demanding skill, practice gratitude, play video games (specific ones), and be sure to reminisce.

  • 27 June 2024

The secrets of Australia’s Berkshire Hathaway

Washington H. Soul Pattinson is an ASX top 50 stock with one of the best investment track records this country has seen. Yet, most Australians haven’t heard of it, and the company seems to prefer it that way.

Australian housing is twice as expensive as the US

A new report suggests Australian housing is twice as expensive as that of the US and UK on a price-to-income basis. It also reveals that it’s cheaper to live in New York than most of our capital cities.

Overcoming the fear of running out of money in retirement

There’s an epidemic in Australia that has nothing to do with COVID-19, the flu, or the respiratory syncytial virus. This one is called FORO, or the fear of running out of money in retirement, and it's a growing problem.

The catalyst for a LICs rebound

The discounts on listed investment vehicles are at historically wide levels. There are lots of reasons given, including size and liquidity, yet there's a better explanation for the discounts, and why a rebound may be near.

Latest Updates

Financial planning

Our finances should enable and not dictate our lives

Most people would prefer to have more money than less of it. But at what point do the trappings of wealth and success start to outweigh the benefits of striving for more?


This vital yet "forgotten" indicator of inflation holds good news

Financial commentators seem to have forgotten the leading cause of inflation: growth in the supply of money. Warren Bird explains the link and explores where it suggests inflation is headed.


Emerging market equities are ripe with opportunity

Emerging markets offer compelling value compared to history and the stretched valuations of developed market equities. Investors can benefit from three big tailwinds, but only if they are selective.


Tomorrow's taxpayers pay for today's policy mistakes

Less affordable housing isn't the only thing set to weigh on Australia's younger generations. If new solutions for pension deficits and the use of resource revenue aren't found quickly, tomorrow's taxpayer will foot the bill.

How would a switch to nuclear affect electricity prices?

The Coalition's plan to build seven nuclear power stations in 15 years faces scrutiny due to high costs and slow construction. And it is unlikely the investment would yield cheaper energy for Australian households and industry.


Reader feedback from our 2024 survey

Articles that are easy to understand, quick to read, and credible; being able to engage via the comments section; and keeping Firstlinks free and independent are just some of the features valued by our readers.


Have your say on Firstlinks and the topics we cover

We’d love to hear your thoughts on Firstlinks and how we can make it better for you. If you’d like to help us out in a just a couple of minutes, please take our short survey.



© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.