Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 347

Top three ways an SMA helps optimise tax

There are few free lunches in investing, so any reward from reducing a tax burden is worth the effort. Financial advisers are increasingly presenting a more tax-effective investment solution to clients as part of their value proposition. The challenge is making sure everyone understands the opportunity.

In this article, we examine how tax optimisation can work using Separately Managed Accounts (SMAs). 

1. Avoid tax inheritance

Investors should avoid the inheritance of a capital gains liability. The chart above shows a hypothetical increase in a managed fund’s unit price over a period that begins when a fund manager buys a stock into that fund, and when it sells that same stock. In the middle of that period, the investor buys units in that fund. The price of that unit has inflated since the stock was originally bought, because it includes the accrued capital gain.

The investor has no choice but to buy into that gain if they want to invest in the fund, even though they were not invested during that initial period. Investors have inherited a capital gain liability. Of course, for the sake of simplicity we have made very simple assumptions, but the concept remains.

For completeness, it should also be noted the opposite is true. If a fund is carrying a capital loss, then the investor can inherit those losses and potentially reduce taxable income, although that is not typically the objective of investing.

The following chart shows what happens with an SMA.

With an SMA, the investor has beneficial ownership of the shares in a portfolio, and that makes all the difference in terms of the tax burden for an individual investor.

If we assume an investment on the same day through the period as in the previous example, the capital gain begins from the day of investment, and not the start of the period. The managed account structure means investors are buying shares in their own name, rather than units in a fund carrying capital gains. They will avoid inheriting a capital gains liability. All other things equal, the tax burden should be lower.

2. In specie transfers

Another way to optimise tax is to transfer stock holdings into the SMA via an in specie transfer, which saves selling down assets and avoids a capital gains liability even before the new investing takes place.

In the example above, an investor holding ANZ moves their investment into an SMA which also holds ANZ alongside other stocks. The key point here is through a transfer, the amount of selling is minimised through the transition into the SMA.

The opposite also works. An investor moving out of an SMA may decide to keep ANZ and sell out of the rest. That may reduce the tax burden on the way out.

Logistically, the ‘in specie’ stock transfer is typically nominated during the platform application process. The adviser (on behalf of the client) will nominate where in specie transfers apply, saving the investor any avoidable capital gains.

And by avoiding the trade, the investor also saves on brokerage costs. 

This is the advantage of having beneficial ownership of shares. The same outcome is generally not possible with managed funds.

3. Manage individual holdings

As a beneficial owner of stocks, SMAs also allow investors to manage their holdings in a way that optimises their personal tax position. An investor can elect to hold or sell parcels of stock depending on their overall tax position. For example, a gain on one parcel may be used to offset a loss on another, and so on. This technique of splicing individual parcels is generally not available in a managed fund arrangement.

Managed funds have their benefits too

While the examples above highlight some examples of tax advantages of SMA over a managed fund, there are still plenty of reasons a managed fund arrangement may be suitable for other investors.

For example, there are more investment options available in the managed fund space, especially if the investor has a specific portfolio need such as in an illiquid investment or a low-risk equity income strategy. Many of these are not offered in an SMA.

 

Andrew Stanley is Head of Australian Equities at Ralton Asset Management. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor, and SMAs are usually available only through a financial adviser.

 

  •   4 March 2020
  • 2
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

How to minimise tax with a will

Nine rules to guide you to die with zero

How a carer inherited an estate

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.