Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 347

Top three ways an SMA helps optimise tax

There are few free lunches in investing, so any reward from reducing a tax burden is worth the effort. Financial advisers are increasingly presenting a more tax-effective investment solution to clients as part of their value proposition. The challenge is making sure everyone understands the opportunity.

In this article, we examine how tax optimisation can work using Separately Managed Accounts (SMAs). 

1. Avoid tax inheritance

Investors should avoid the inheritance of a capital gains liability. The chart above shows a hypothetical increase in a managed fund’s unit price over a period that begins when a fund manager buys a stock into that fund, and when it sells that same stock. In the middle of that period, the investor buys units in that fund. The price of that unit has inflated since the stock was originally bought, because it includes the accrued capital gain.

The investor has no choice but to buy into that gain if they want to invest in the fund, even though they were not invested during that initial period. Investors have inherited a capital gain liability. Of course, for the sake of simplicity we have made very simple assumptions, but the concept remains.

For completeness, it should also be noted the opposite is true. If a fund is carrying a capital loss, then the investor can inherit those losses and potentially reduce taxable income, although that is not typically the objective of investing.

The following chart shows what happens with an SMA.

With an SMA, the investor has beneficial ownership of the shares in a portfolio, and that makes all the difference in terms of the tax burden for an individual investor.

If we assume an investment on the same day through the period as in the previous example, the capital gain begins from the day of investment, and not the start of the period. The managed account structure means investors are buying shares in their own name, rather than units in a fund carrying capital gains. They will avoid inheriting a capital gains liability. All other things equal, the tax burden should be lower.

2. In specie transfers

Another way to optimise tax is to transfer stock holdings into the SMA via an in specie transfer, which saves selling down assets and avoids a capital gains liability even before the new investing takes place.

In the example above, an investor holding ANZ moves their investment into an SMA which also holds ANZ alongside other stocks. The key point here is through a transfer, the amount of selling is minimised through the transition into the SMA.

The opposite also works. An investor moving out of an SMA may decide to keep ANZ and sell out of the rest. That may reduce the tax burden on the way out.

Logistically, the ‘in specie’ stock transfer is typically nominated during the platform application process. The adviser (on behalf of the client) will nominate where in specie transfers apply, saving the investor any avoidable capital gains.

And by avoiding the trade, the investor also saves on brokerage costs. 

This is the advantage of having beneficial ownership of shares. The same outcome is generally not possible with managed funds.

3. Manage individual holdings

As a beneficial owner of stocks, SMAs also allow investors to manage their holdings in a way that optimises their personal tax position. An investor can elect to hold or sell parcels of stock depending on their overall tax position. For example, a gain on one parcel may be used to offset a loss on another, and so on. This technique of splicing individual parcels is generally not available in a managed fund arrangement.

Managed funds have their benefits too

While the examples above highlight some examples of tax advantages of SMA over a managed fund, there are still plenty of reasons a managed fund arrangement may be suitable for other investors.

For example, there are more investment options available in the managed fund space, especially if the investor has a specific portfolio need such as in an illiquid investment or a low-risk equity income strategy. Many of these are not offered in an SMA.

 

Andrew Stanley is Head of Australian Equities at Ralton Asset Management. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor, and SMAs are usually available only through a financial adviser.

 

  •   4 March 2020
  • 2
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

How to minimise tax with a will

Nine rules to guide you to die with zero

How a carer inherited an estate

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

The housing slide could become a crash

House prices are sliding across Australia, yet the most dangerous ingredient for a housing crash is still missing. If job losses surge amid growing economic risks, today's correction could become a historic property downturn.

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Division 296: the initial moves to make before the windows close

What if the best superannuation strategy isn't about earning more, but acting before your options disappear? Several overlooked planning windows are narrowing, with consequences that can last for decades.

Planning

Avoid unnecessary CGT with this estate planning clause

A simple estate plan can create a ticking time bomb. One overlooked clause can pit spouses against children, delay inheritances, and potentially leave a family facing an unexpected tax bill worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Exchange traded products

The hidden trade-off in fixed income ETFs

Some investment trade-offs are immediately visible. Others are embedded in the way a portfolio is constructed. Understanding the difference may explain why similar-looking investments can produce surprisingly different results.

Retirement

The mortgage free retirement is fading

What happens when a generation reaches retirement carrying obligations previous generations largely avoided? New research suggests we may need to rethink both how much we need in retirement and what life could look like.

Retirement

The key question to inspire a confident and purposeful retirement

Most people spend decades planning for retirement. Far fewer plan for what happens when they get there. The difference may explain why so many find the transition harder and less fulfilling than expected, despite careful preparation.

Latest from Morningstar

Making the case for a 'good enough' portfolio

Some investors spend years chasing the perfect strategy. Others choose a path that’s simply good enough and move on. Which approach is more likely to deliver both better outcomes and a happier financial life over the long run?

Investment strategies

Is the US market as expensive as CAPE says?

Many investing ideas survive for decades. But that does not make them right. A famous valuation measure implies that US shares are dangerously expensive, but the evidence may point to a very different conclusion.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.