Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 129

Trusted professions go with the Flo’

Trust. It's at the heart of finance. Trust is that special property that bends time, allowing for the provision of a good, service or facility today on the strength of a belief that the other party will honour its financial obligation to make payment at or before some later date.

So central is trust to finance that the word ‘credit’ has its origin in the Latin crédere, which means to believe (and from which credo is also derived). The sudden collapse of trust in finance can be catastrophic, as demonstrated dramatically by the demise of the 158-year-old Lehman Brothers in the space of a few short months during 2008.

If the existence of trust lubricates the wheels of commerce and its absence acts as a retardant, then clearly being 'trusted' is economically advantageous. So just what makes one profession more trusted in the eyes of the public when compared to another?

Trust across professions - a survey approach

Unlike temperature or barometric pressure the measurement of trust resides not in the domain of physics but in sociology. Trust tends therefore to be measured by surveys that rank occupations across a scale from least trusted to most. One Australian example is the annual Roy Morgan Image of Professions Survey, run continuously since 1987 and expanding from an original 19 occupations to 30 now.

The Roy Morgan Survey respondents score people in various occupations for honesty and ethical standards using one of five possible responses; Very High, High, Average, Low or Very Low. A selection of these occupations appears in the table below, ranked highest to lowest for 2015.

The percentage of respondents rating each occupation as “Very High” or “High” for ethics and honesty for 2015 were:

HC Table1 091015

HC Table1 091015

Source: Roy Morgan Image of Professions Survey.

The results are unequivocal. Nursing is the most ethical and honest profession for the 21st year in a row. It's quite a gap to the next most trusted professions at 84%, jointly held by pharmacists and doctors, with teachers rounding out the top four.

And what of professions connected to finance, commerce and investing?  Accountants fare relatively well, sitting in the top half in 11th spot. Lawyers sit mid-pack, holding 15th on 31%, whilst financial planners sit two below lawyers in 17th place on an ‘approval’ score of 24%.

Other professions are clearly perceived as being less trustworthy. Amongst these are stockbrokers (26th), insurance brokers (27th) and finally in last place, car salespeople at a score of 4, a position held for 28 years in succession.

Why are nurses so trusted?

Part of the answer might lie in the high standard of training and education required. Most states require a minimum three year tertiary qualification to become a registered nurse. Further, once qualified, trainee nurses are under strict supervision, gradually increasing the range of treatments and medication they are allowed to administer as their experience builds.

Nursing is also a profession with a rich history of compassion, empathy and service. From Florence Nightingale tending the wounded in the Crimean War to the volunteers who battled the recent Ebola outbreak, nursing is a profession emphatically linked to the service of others over the advancement of self.

Can financial planners bridge the gap to nurses?

It’s clearly a long haul from 24% to 92%. Financial planning’s cause hasn’t been helped by a series of advice scandals over the past several years, some involving Australia’s largest financial institutions. In the wake of these scandals, the laws governing the provision of advice have been strengthened. Yet these are only part of a greater shift that must occur if financial planning is to sit amongst the truly trusted professions.

If you’re in a profession struggling with trust and credibility, nursing is a model of professionalism worth aspiring to. Modern nursing has a clear and unbroken lineage to the pioneering work of The Lady with the Lamp, as Florence Nightingale came affectionately to be known.

Nightingale was not a nurse by training. How could she be when no such training existed in mid-1800s Britain? She was in equal parts social reformer and statistician. Among her many contributions was the development of the pie chart to illustrate numerical proportion. With this and other novel data visualisation techniques she conveyed information vital to both the Crimean War effort and public hygiene more generally, and for her efforts became the first female member of the esteemed Royal Statistical Society.

Nightingale is best remembered, however, for establishing the foundations of the nursing profession in 1860. The principles she espoused; of service, diligence and compassion, together with a body of knowledge based on scientific observation and measurement, still resonates in the Nightingale Pledge which, although modernised since its first incarnation in 1893, remains at the core of nursing’s code of ethics in most jurisdictions.

Earning trust, and keeping it

Professions who find themselves not as universally trusted as nursing might first seek to focus on finding their reason for being, a reason other than the accrual of monetary benefits and material possessions. Unlike financial planning, nursing suffers little in the way of principal/agent effects. These effects present themselves when a person tries to simultaneously serve two parties with opposing interests. It is fair to surmise that in any hospital the patient, loved one, doctor, nurse and hospital board are all pulling in the same direction – a speedy recovery and discharge.

Perhaps the last word on trust is best left to the father of modern economics, Adam Smith, who in his 1759 work The Theory of Moral Sentiments, suggested that one should seek not to be praised but instead first to be worthy of praise.

In a similar vein, if financial planners wish to emulate the trusted status of nurses they should seek first not to be trusted, but to be worthy of trust. The pie chart, a tool used by financial planners the world over to sell complex investment concepts to clients, was after all first perfected by the lady who wrote the book on trust.

 

Harry Chemay is a former Certified Financial Planner who previously practised as a specialist SMSF advisor and as a consultant to APRA-regulated superannuation funds. He is CEO and co-founder of the automated investment service at www.clover.com.au.

3 Comments
Rebecca Boles
October 11, 2015

A great point to raise Harry! It's pretty horrifying to see planners so far down the list. I would be interested to hear how this could be strengthened (or adversely affected) by the introduction of robo-advice.

Harry Chemay
October 12, 2015

Hi Rebecca. Thanks for your comment. On the positive side Financial Planners, whilst at the lower end of the scale, are seen as more trustworthy than business executives, talk-back radio personalities and members of parliament. Make of that what you will. That said, there's clearly a lot more work to be done, above and beyond current regulatory initiatives, to drive financial planning further up the trust rankings.

For financial planning to cement its position among the ranks of highly trusted professions, hard conversations must first be had as to why the industry exists in the first place. Is it to be a source of distribution for product manufacturers? Or does it exist to help people organize their lives so that they can be their best financial selves?

Those planning businesses wedded to the former proposition will struggle. No longer is the planner the font of all knowledge and sole source of information on investment products and strategies. Playing 'gatekeeper' to information that is freely available on the web is a shaky foundation for the planning practice of the 21st century. That train has already left the platform. What's needed, desperately, are planners who coach, mentor and challenge clients to be their best financial selves. And yes, that means the occasional 'honest conversation' to keep clients on track to achieving their goals.

'Robo-advice' (I personally dislike this term for its pejorative connotation) will empower the latter type of planner whilst challenging the former. These automated investment services will allow people with less complex needs to invest without having to go though the traditional financial planning process. And let's face it, for very many Australians that process is cumbersome, time-consuming and of questionable financial value (here the regulatory burden has to share some of the blame).

'Robo-advice' may actually turn out to be an entry point for future full financial planning clients, as the circa 75% of unadvised Australians gain access to this type of technology. Shifting through life-stages will naturally create the need for quality personal advice between an adviser and former 'robo-only' user. There will always be a need for quality personal advice, but at the right time and for the right reasons. Even here however I see robo-advice platforms powering that interaction in the years to come, with 'big picture' conversations between adviser & client framed around future goals, dreams & aspirations, with the adviser's 'robo' doing the heavy quantitative lifting of probabilistic projections, goal optimization & investment strategy execution and monitoring.

'Robo-advice' will not disrupt competent forward-thinking planners any more than spreadsheets disrupted the accounting profession twenty years ago. Rather than disrupting accounting the spreadsheet revolution powered a whole new breed of accountants, able to use this new technology to generate new value-added revenue streams. What we don't see anymore (at least I don't) are dimly-lit rooms full of visor-wearing accountants cranking the arms on their calculators, ready to make written entries into their double-entry journals.

Martin Mulcare
October 10, 2015

Thanks, Harry,
I appreciate the lessons from the nursing profession. I also think that there is a valuable lesson to be gleaned from the professions in equal second place. At the risk of being simplistic, they provide a great lesson in the potential value of separating advice (doctors) from product (pharmacists) to the benefit of the reputation of both professions.

 

Leave a Comment:

     
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Five ways the Retirement Review points to new policies

The Retirement Income Review goes much further than an innocent-sounding 'fact base', and is sure to guide policies in the run up to the next election. It will change how we think about retirement incomes.

Graeme Shaw on why investing is at a pivotal moment

Company profits have not improved for many years but higher valuations have been driven by falling rates and excess liquidity. Conditions do not suit a value and contrarian manager but here are some opportunities.

Retirement Review gives strong views on hoarding of super

The Review includes some profound findings, most notable that retirement income should include drawing down far more capital. Expect post-retirement products to proliferate under a Retirement Income Covenant.

11 key findings on retirement dreams during the pandemic

A mid-pandemic survey of over 1,000 people near or in retirement found three in four are not confident how long their money will last. Only 18% felt their money was safe during a strong economic downturn.

Bank scorecard 2020: when will the mojo return?

Banks severely cut dividends in 2020 but are expected to improve payments in 2021. History provides clues to when the banks will return to their 2019 levels of profitability, but who is positioned the best?

Generational wealth transfers will affect all investors

It's not only that 60 is the new 40, but 80 is the new 60. Many Baby Boomers spend up in retirement and are less inclined to leave a nest egg to their children. The ways wealth transfers will affect all investors.

Latest Updates

Shares

Hamish Douglass on big tech and life after COVID

On the sidelines of the Morningstar Conference, the Magellan co-founder reflects on the pandemic and which sectors are set to gain and lose. He says we were lucky the pandemic hit when it did (videos and transcripts).

Superannuation

Cost of running an SMSF receives updated judgement

Administration costs can rise for complexity, especially owning property in an SMSF, but fees are highly competitive from a wide range of service providers. The break-even cost is less than previously reported.

SMSF strategies

Three areas SMSFs should consider outsourcing

SMSF trustees often cite ‘control of my investments’ as the number one motivation for setting up their own fund. But it still makes sense to outsource some parts of a well-diversified portfolio.

Retirement

Apparently, retirees should learn to SKI

The Retirement Income Review demonstrated limited understanding of the risks faced by self-funded retirees implementing rational human behaviour. Spending to qualify for the age pension is not a solution.

Retirement

7-point checklist for managing the uncertain timing of death

Average life expectancies are a weak predictor of individual outcomes, and it's better to consider a range of probable lifespans. A plan that lasts to the average will disappoint every second retiree.

Exchange traded products

'Quality' ETFs under the microscope

Interest in 'quality' factor ETFs has increased this year, helped by very attractive returns. However, not all ETFs are created alike and there are divergences in portfolio traits which investors can identify.

Shares

Is growth of zombie companies real or fiction?

Much has been written about the rise of 'zombie firms' which should have gone bankrupt, but new research should be comforting to economists and investors alike, with focus on a particular segment.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2020 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use.
Any general advice or class service prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, has been prepared by without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.