Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 220

The truth on three big indexing questions

Indexing has become an undeniable force in the investment world. Consider that US$1.4 trillion in net new cash and reinvested dividends flowed into US equity index funds and ETFs in the decade through year-end 2016, which is astonishing compared with the US$1.1 trillion in net outflows from active funds in the same period.

Indexing’s rise did not happen by accident. At Vanguard, the improvement in index fund management included refining index sampling techniques, better approximating the fundamental characteristics of benchmarks, working closely with benchmark providers and strengthening index methodologies.

But the push to improve indexing does not stop there. In my new role as Vanguard’s Chief Investment Officer, my global team and I are dedicated to staying abreast of new themes in the investment world, especially exploring the details of what makes indexing tick. Our mission is to optimise the investment outcomes for our clients and investors overall at a low cost.

I am a firm believer in the value indexing delivers to both the investor and the market as a whole. But over the last few months, indexing has received criticism from a few commentators alleging indexing hurts price discovery, stifles competition via common ownership, and leads to higher volatility. I believe those claims are inherently false, so let’s walk through these arguments and set the record straight.

1. Does indexing hurt price discovery?

The concern about indexing hurting price discovery is naive. Price discovery is driven by active managers, Vanguard included. I know from my years as a bond guy the vital role that active managers play in keeping security prices aligned with their value. The thought that indexing could somehow get in the way of that is troubling for me. But the truth is that even though indexing has grown in popularity, it’s still a small part of overall trading volumes (i.e. portfolio managers’ trading of index funds’ underlying securities). Since indexing represents about 5% or less of US equity daily volumes, as shown in the chart below, there is still considerable price discovery and liquidity provided by active managers.

Breakdown of overall individual stocks’ trading volume

Sources: Vanguard and Bloomberg, 2017.

2. Does indexing cause a lack of competition?

Critics claim that managers of corporations whose stocks are in some of the leading indexes become complacent participants, rather than competitors, because stock prices are propped up by the steady drumbeat of index investments. There is no evidence to support these anticompetitive practices or that there is a cause-and-effect relationship between common ownership and product price competition. All the corporate executives that I know are diehard competitors and are doing everything in their power to expand market share, increase revenues, and boost profits.

In addition, as owners of just about every company in every industry, index funds have no incentive to favour one industry over another as higher product prices in any one industry would cut against fund investors’ interests in other sectors.

We believe fierce industry competition produces greater shareholder return and a healthier industry as a whole, since competition forces companies to constantly innovate and find new ways to deliver value to both consumers and shareholders. We firmly believe the best performers should be rewarded, which is why we advocate for executive compensation plans to be tied to performance, not stock price, and have explicitly promoted competition among firms in their respective peer groups.

3. Does indexing drive volatility?

I do not see any substance to the concern that equity index funds contribute to market volatility. Regardless of size, indexing is not a monolithic investment strategy. Index investments are spread through many market caps and investment styles, and the majority of index assets are held by long-term investors in broad-based, market-cap-weighted funds. There is no convincing evidence that the growth of index funds has had an impact on market volatility or the dispersion of stock returns. Even as index funds’ share of mutual fund assets has consistently grown, market standard deviation has risen and fallen in a seemingly random pattern. Dispersion among the stock market’s securities has remained somewhat constant, except for the tech bubble and the global financial crisis.

The real truth: indexing has earned its accolades

Indexing has transformed the investment experience for millions of investors. We take pride in the fact that we have helped investors enjoy the many benefits of indexing, including:

  • Low cost
  • Broad diversification
  • Relative predictability
  • The potential for long-term outperformance compared with the performance of many high-cost active fund managers.

Indexing offers a firm foundation for investors seeking to achieve their investment goals, and as Vanguard’s CIO, it’s my job to make sure that indexing and active management continue their symbiotic relationship in the investment landscape.

 

Greg Davis is the Vanguard Group’s Global Chief Investment Officer. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

  •   21 September 2017
  • 2
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

The challenges of building a lazy portfolio

Everything my friends need to know about investing

Howard Marks asks 5 questions on indexing

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Retirement income expectations hit new highs

Younger Australians think they’ll need $100k a year in retirement - nearly double what current retirees spend. Expectations are rising fast, but are they realistic or just another case of lifestyle inflation?

Four best-ever charts for every adviser and investor

In any year since 1875, if you'd invested in the ASX, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods. It's just one of the must-have stats that all investors should know.

Why super returns may be heading lower

Five mega trends point to risks of a more inflation prone and lower growth environment. This, along with rich market valuations, should constrain medium term superannuation returns to around 5% per annum.

Preparing for aged care

Whether for yourself or a family member, it’s never too early to start thinking about aged care. This looks at the best ways to plan ahead, as well as the changes coming to aged care from November 1 this year.

Our experts on Jim Chalmers' super tax backdown

Labor has caved to pressure on key parts of the Division 296 tax, though also added some important nuances. Here are six experts’ views on the changes and what they mean for you.        

Why I dislike dividend stocks

If you need income then buying dividend stocks makes perfect sense. But if you don’t then it makes little sense because it’s likely to limit building real wealth. Here’s what you should do instead.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

LICs vs ETFs – which perform best?

With investor sentiment shifting and ETFs surging ahead, we pit Australia’s biggest LICs against their ETF rivals to see which delivers better returns over the short and long term. The results are revealing.

Retirement

The growing debt burden of retiring Australians

More Australians are retiring with larger mortgages and less super. This paper explores how unlocking housing wealth can help ease the nation’s growing retirement cashflow crunch.

The ASX is full of broken blue chips

Investing in the ASX 20 or 200 requires vigilance. Blue chips aren’t immune to failure, and the old belief that you can simply hold them forever is outdated. 

Shares

Buying Guzman y Gomez, and not just for the burritos

Adding high-quality compounders at attractive valuations is difficult in an efficient market. However, during the volatile FY25 reporting season, an opportunity arose to increase a position in Mexican fast-food chain GYG.

Investment strategies

Factor investing and how to use ETFs to your advantage

Factor-based ETFs are bridging the gap between active and passive investing, giving investors low-cost access to proven drivers of long-term returns such as quality, value, momentum and dividend yield. 

Strategy

Engineers vs lawyers: the US-China divide that will shape this century

In Breakneck, Dan Wang contrasts China’s “engineering state” with America’s “lawyerly society,” showing how these mindsets drive innovation, dysfunction, and reshape global power amid rising rivalry. 

Retirement

18 rules for ageing well

The rules to age successfully include, 'the unexamined life lasts longer', 'change no more than one-eighth of your life at a time', 'nobody is thinking about you', and 'pursue virtue but don’t sweat it'.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.