Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 309

Where Australia is an energy outlier

Energy prices. The environment. Climate change. Saving the planet. These issues seem to be increasingly topical, but many of the discussions are not grounded in fact. Let's look at the current state of play in energy usage in Australia and consider the path forward.

Australians do not use energy sustainably

Each Australian annually uses energy corresponding to 5.7 tonnes of oil. This is in the same range as the US (6.9 tonnes) but much more than the rest of the world including China and Europe. There is a lot of room for Australians to use less energy with more efficient materials and machines or making lifestyle changes.

Australia’s energy problems

Australia's energy problems

Source: BP and the UN

Australians rely on fossil fuel for about 94% of their total energy needs. The only countries that rely more on fossil fuel are either oil producers (such as countries in the Middle East, North Africa, or the former Soviet Bloc), coal producers (such as Poland) or countries with limited resources (such as Trinidad).

Comparing Australia to other large economies, we rely more on fossil fuel than oil, gas and coal producers (such as the US, China) and materially more than countries that have made fighting climate change a priority (such as those in the EU).

Australia’s energy problems

Source: BP

The consequence of this intensive use of fossil fuel is that Australia, with less than 25 million inhabitants, emits about 400 million tonnes of CO2 annually.

This is comparable to what is emitted by the 66 million residents of the United Kingdom (410 million tonnes) or the 80 million residents of Turkey (398 million tonnes).

Looking at per capita emissions, each Australian emits about 16 tonnes of CO2 every year. That is about four times as much as the world average and two and a half times as much as developed economies in Europe.

Australia’s energy problems

Source: BP and The UN

Political intervention triggered by higher bills

Coal is the king of Australian power production with a 61% share of the mix. The only countries that rely more on coal are South Africa, Poland, China, India and Kazakhstan. Australia’s use of wind and solar is comparable to the rest of the world but it has very limited hydropower. As a result, Australia relies on fossil fuels produced locally for about 85% of its power production.

Source: BP

Australia is the world’s top liquified natural gas (LNG) exporter and the world’s top coal exporter. It exports more than two-thirds of its gas and about 85 per cent of its coal.

There is limited appetite for additional coal-fired power plants due to the amount of pollution they produce and gas plants are hurt by the cost of gas.

Australian gas is becoming more expensive as recently-built assets are geared to export, and Australians have the unpalatable choice to either compete with Asian buyers or source gas from ageing fields whose operating costs increases year after year.

Source: ABS

Renewable energy has helped reduce the dependency on coal and gas in other countries. Investment in wind and solar is supported across Australia by subsidies, at both the federal and state level. Most of those subsidies are funded by customers, rather than general taxation.

Today, renewable subsidies represent 4% to 8% of the typical consumer bill. This varies by state depending on the growth of renewables and the layer of support given besides federal programs.

The rise in coal and gas prices, and to a lesser extent the bill surcharges to fund renewables, have added to the combined power and gas bills. In aggregate, Australians of median income now pay about 4.8% of disposable income for power and gas, whereas they only paid 4.4% in 2016.

As for lower income households, they now pay about 10.6% of their disposable income for power and gas, whereas two years ago they paid 9.6%. These increases would have been higher if the allowed return for power and gas networks had not been cut by the regulator.

Source: Australian Energy Regulator

The pressure on disposable income is also faced by industrial companies, triggering the following political and regulatory interventions:

  • Regulators are forcing greater transparency on networks, and besides cutting allowed returns have generally toughened regulation, and

  • From July 2019, Australians will benefit from automatic switching to a ‘default offer’ regulated by the Australian Energy Regulator. Customers on expensive tariffs will automatically be switched to this lower offer. For people on the higher tariffs, this could save hundreds of dollars.

Source: Australian Energy Regulator and Canstar Blue

The way forward: the cheapest and cleanest energy is that which you do not use

AMP Capital has decades of experience investing globally in power and gas assets. As long-term investors, we are called upon to fund new investments or support companies during times of transition. In our experience, energy policy has the following pillars:

  • Safety of supply: the nation has access to energy, and if possible that energy is domestic or from friendly countries;

  • Affordability: residents and business only need a modest share of their income to pay their bills; and

  • Environment: environmental damage is avoided or remediated.

These three objectives each cost money and are often divergent (for instance, coal is great for safety of supply and affordability, but is a high pollutant). This means that energy policy is about priorities and investment.

In Australia, the introduction of renewables can help in two ways:

  • If the renewables are commercially contracted over the long term, it will reduce Australia’s dependency on coal and gas, and thus reduce the exposure of ordinary Australians to fluctuations in international energy markets.

  • As renewables are intermittent (the strength of the wind and sunshine changes during the day), they need to be backed up by power plants that can react quickly. These so-called peak plants do not need to be built - Australia can, for a limited amount, convert and subsidise existing assets that are largely amortised. This would help ensure safety of supply and protect jobs in those plants.

However we believe the real way forward is for Australia to commit to the cheapest, safest and cleanest form of energy: the energy that is not used. Australia should invest much more in energy efficiency and thus cut bills and pollution materially.

While there are upfront costs (upgrading buildings, replacing vehicles, changing machinery) the long-term savings offer a return and the short-term effort creates and supports many jobs and can dramatically improve the living conditions of the less fortunate Australians.

 

Michel Debs is a London-based Portfolio Manager and Analyst with the Global Listed Infrastructure team at AMP Capital, a sponsor of Cuffelinks. This article is for general information only and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

For more articles and papers from AMP Capital, please click here.

 

4 Comments
Carlo Bongarzoni
June 22, 2019

Michel - why is it that your stats and some charts as well as your commentary are so different to other observers who take a different perspective than your article? The whole problem with commentating on effects of various power sources is the non-consensus on costs, impacts and solutions. The whole global warming/climate change debate is consequently riddles with anomalies and conflicting figures. Just take the effects of CO2 for instance? Science eg the evidence that underpins the global warming claims surely need far more rigour before nations spend billions on change none of which has yet proven to be effective but causes hardship for so many without a voice?

Greg Hollands
June 06, 2019

Michael, An interesting article but you forgot to mention the obvious. Please note that your charts that reflect the makeup of the source of energy comparing Australia to the rest of the world clearly show that there is NO NUCLEAR here. Your graphs should also be clear about the fact that you are referring to per capital, not the whole country. One would be forgiven for misinterpreting these graphs. The Chief Scientist is on record as stating that if Australia ceased to exist and there were no further emissions then it would not make one iota of difference to the outcome overall. Not much mention of that at all. So the predictions are not as dire as one would be led into concluding. I would also like to see some analysis of the amount of carbon that goes into producing aluminium here in Australia. Each ingot of aluminium that is exported to everywhere else in the world in a bundle of energy that Australia carries the "cost" of in emissions, but which is actually consumed elsewhere . You might also ask about when a volcano erupts anywhere in the world that it spews in one day, the whole years savings of CO2 world wide. Just a little balance would be a wonderful thing.

Dudley
June 23, 2019

"referring to per capital, not the whole country":

Australia’s carbon ‘foot print’ is ~50 tonnes per square kilometre per year – similar to Brazil and Canada.

50 times greater are Japan, Germany, United Kingdom of England and Scotland.

10 – 20 times greater are USA, China and India.

If all the world were like Australia there would be no problem with carbon dioxide emissions.

Australia’s part in global carbon dioxide emissions is immeasurably insignificant as would be any Australian abatement.

Australia can rationally concentrate on adaptation rather than abatement – a climate taker not a climate maker.

We can be confident that our energy producers and consumers are watching technological developments.

Brian Smith
October 07, 2021

Brian

Agree Dudley. This is a one-sided push narrative to suit the investment bias of the author. Australia is an exporter of energy , including in value-added products, and we are adroit in seeking out and implementing technological advances to meet our published strategy. We watch in awe as many developed countries around the world preach to us about changes they require in our economy and life-style but do not show the same resolute march forward evidenced by Australia to contribute to the 'emerging' world order. And the graph that shows the 100% increase in the cost of CO2 is interesting. Why produce more CO2 when those geniuses could simply harvest what they need from the 'super-abundance' they see in the atmosphere.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Doubts over the Eraring Power Station closure

The global energy crunch is creating new megatrends

Momentum or rupture: has demand for oil already peaked?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Lessons when a fund manager of the year is down 25%

Every successful fund manager suffers periods of underperformance, and investors who jump from fund to fund chasing results are likely to do badly. Selecting a manager is a long-term decision but what else?

2022 election survey results: disillusion and disappointment

In almost 1,000 responses, our readers differ in voting intentions versus polling of the general population, but they have little doubt who will win and there is widespread disappointment with our politics.

Now you can earn 5% on bonds but stay with quality

Conservative investors who want the greater capital security of bonds can now lock in 5% but they should stay at the higher end of credit quality. Rises in rates and defaults mean it's not as easy as it looks.

30 ETFs in one ecosystem but is there a favourite?

In the last decade, ETFs have become a mainstay of many portfolios, with broad market access to most asset types, as well as a wide array of sectors and themes. Is there a favourite of a CEO who oversees 30 funds?

Australia’s bounty: is it just diversified luck?

Increases in commodity prices have fuelled global inflation while benefiting commodities exporters like Australia. Oftentimes, booms lead to busts and investors need to get the timing right on pricing cycles to be successful.

Meg on SMSFs – More on future-proofing your fund

Single-member SMSFs face challenges where the eventual beneficiaries (or support team in the event of incapacity) will be the member’s adult children. Even worse, what happens if one or more of the children live overseas?

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Five features of a fair performance fee, including a holiday

Most investors pay little attention to the performance fee on their fund but it can have a material impact on returns, especially if the structure is unfair. Check for these features and a coming fee holiday.

Interviews

Ned Bell on why there’s a generational step change underway

During market dislocation events, investors react irrationally and it should be a great environment for active management. The last few years have been an easy ride on tech stocks but it's now all about quality.  

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Powers of attorney for your fund

Granting an enduring power of attorney is an important decision for the trustees of an SMSF. There are alternatives and protections to consider including who should perform this vital role and when.

Property

The great divergence: the evolution of the 'magnetic' workplace

The pandemic profoundly impacted the way we use real estate but in a post-pandemic environment, tenant preferences and behaviours are now providing more certainty to the outlook of our major real estate sectors.

Shares

Bank reporting season scorecard May 2022

A key feature of the May results for the banking sector was profits trending back to pre-Covid-19 levels, thanks to lower than expected unemployment and the growth in house prices.

Why gender diversity matters for investors

Companies with a boys’ club approach to leadership are a red flag for investors. On the other hand, companies that walk the talk on women in leadership roles perform better, potentially making them better investments. 

Economy

Is it all falling apart for central banks?

Central banks are unable to ignore the inflation in front of them, but underlying macro-economic conditions indicate that inflation may be transitory and the consequences of monetary tightening dangerous.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.