Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 119

The upside of fintech for wealth managers

Fintech has captured the imagination of many financial services firms looking to leverage differentiating technology to accelerate their innovation. Nowhere is that more true than within the wealth and asset management sector.

Increasingly, financial services organisations are becoming technology services providers. While fintechs are seen by many as disruptive to traditional financial services businesses, in reality they present great opportunities for savvy organisations.

The early impact of fintech has already been felt by the banking sector, where traditionally large value chains and highly visible, commoditised products made it ripe for disruption. Bitcoin was an early mover and progress has also been relentless in peer-to-peer lending, with a range of new market offerings launched. Banks have found themselves on the back foot, forced to adapt to compete with new challengers.

There are clear lessons here for the wealth and asset management industry. Looking at how disruption has driven new cost models and customer experience in the banking sector can help create a framework for wealth managers’ adoption strategies. One message in particular stands out: disrupt yourself and do it now.

Why now?

Wealth and asset managers have so far enjoyed a level of insulation from fintech disruption. This has been the result of two key factors. Firstly, wealth and asset managers operate in a highly regulated, formal market. By its nature, this environment makes it hard for start-ups to get a foothold. Secondly, the nature of wealth and asset management products means they are not something that a typical consumer uses on a daily basis. Asset management operates differently from a cash or credit transaction. This level of complexity has made it difficult for start-ups to target the core factory of a wealth management firm. But, while these factors have provided a degree of security to date, there is no doubt that the value chain for the wealth and asset management industry is under threat.

Traditional and emergent fintechs

Traditional fintechs are large, established technology companies. They have built up industry knowledge over time, understand start-up principles and have the existing technology and a well-funded community of developers to support their aspirations.

The major upside with these large companies is their high visibility. There are opportunities here for wealth and asset management firms to form strategic partnerships that ensure they will be at the forefront of the wave of technology adoption these large players are driving.

The second type of fintechs are innovative firms with specific intermediation strategies. These are the disrupters with the ability to put elements of the traditional wealth management value chain under immediate threat. While it is unlikely these start-ups will steal core business in the short term due to the barriers mentioned earlier, the opportunities are immense and there is likely to be some consolidation in the market.

Low cost transaction platforms

As regulators apply continued pressure on increasing fee transparency across the industry, organisations with higher operating costs will become less attractive to consumers. The winners will be wealth managers who are adaptable, agile and have low cost models. These platforms are highly disruptive as the fee models are low and simple to understand. Most consumers want to maximise returns without passing income to the asset manager. In some overseas markets, new entrants have changed the revenue structure to leverage the inherent value in consumer data, rather than the trading fee. Under this model, they are able to employ aggressive advertising campaigns and upsell to other revenue-driving products.

If fintechs can cause a degree of intermediation in the value chain which reduces cost, then adopting a business model which uses the same or similar delivery models could be the strategic shift needed for an early adopter to change the game.

Transactional versus relationships

Fintech providers target two different types of client. The first is the transactional client, who is often defined by a fee for service arrangement. This type of client benefits from innovative technologies in self-service advice, payment processing and automated account management. The second type of client is relationship-based. They seek an ongoing personal relationship with their planner. Fintech can be used to enhance this relationship via integrated multi-channel communication, single customer view and ongoing risk mitigation.

Consumer experience and data analytics are key

The level of service consumers expect from their wealth and asset management providers is changing. Some new entrants in markets such as New Zealand are already capitalising on this, using real-time video chat and digitalised documentation to engage with their customers on hosted platforms. This solution is scalable and offers immense back-office opportunity, the capacity to reduce storage costs and paper use, restructure the organisation and bring increased efficiencies to the wealth management business model. It also has the added advantage of providing an immediate improvement in customer experience.

Other start-ups are experimenting with the use of social media insights to provide predictive analytics. Done well, this can provide the ability to determine emerging market sentiment and identify which stocks are going to become buy or sell opportunities ahead of the traditional stock market. It can allow for new types of risk management strategies and profiles to be defined, enabling wealth managers to respond to market sentiment and redress and balance the investment mix in their portfolio before anyone else. In a highly competitive market, adopting a solution like this could help attract new customers by maximising returns and improving the investment profile.

Mega-algorithms are coming

The rise of the robo-advisor is imminent, with pilots already running in Australia. Robo-advisors have the potential to impact the industry’s entire investment and scaled advice model, by turning the handling of consumer-managed portfolios into a computer-driven process. Considering how the use of robo-advisor models could change the way the wealth and asset manager advisory workforce is managed going into the next few years, wealth managers will need to deal with this level of change. Otherwise they may find their customers choosing the reliability and predictability robo-advisors can bring to their financial planning needs at a fraction of the cost, and switching to a competitor.

The way forward

Fintech will change wealth and asset management behaviour, and soon. The current regulatory framework provides some level of insulation, but the industry is not immune from market disruption. Preparing for the change requires new ways of thinking and a strategy, plus an operating model to support it. By taking a global view of what is happening in other markets and across the broader financial services sector, Australian wealth and asset managers can position themselves to capitalise on the opportunities fintech presents.


Anita Kimber is an advisory partner in EY’s Oceania Financial Services Office.

The views expressed in this article are the views of the author, not Ernst & Young. The article provides general information, does not constitute advice and should not be relied on as such. Professional advice should be sought prior to any action being taken in reliance on any of the information. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.



Results of roboadvice survey

What are all these fintech startups actually doing?

Other articles on ‘wealth disruption’


Most viewed in recent weeks

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Welcome to Firstlinks Election Edition 458

At around 10.30pm on Saturday night, Scott Morrison called Anthony Albanese to concede defeat in the 2022 election. As voting continued the next day, it became likely that Labor would reach the magic number of 76 seats to form a majority government.   

  • 19 May 2022

Comparing generations and the nine dimensions of our well-being

Using the nine dimensions of well-being used by the OECD, and dividing Australians into Baby Boomers, Generation Xers or Millennials, it is surprisingly easy to identify the winners and losers for most dimensions.

Latest Updates


Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Survey: share your retirement experiences

All Baby Boomers are now over 55 and many are either in retirement or thinking about a transition from work. But what is retirement like? Is it the golden years or a drag? Do you have tips for making the most of it?


Time for value as ‘promise generators’ fail to deliver

A $28 billion global manager still sees far more potential in value than growth stocks, believes energy stocks are undervalued including an Australian company, and describes the need for resilience in investing.


Paul Keating's long-term plans for super and imputation

Paul Keating not only designed compulsory superannuation but in the 30 years since its introduction, he has maintained the rage. Here are highlights of three articles on SG's origins and two more recent interviews.

Fixed interest

On interest rates and credit, do you feel the need for speed?

Central bank support for credit and equity markets is reversing, which has led to wider spreads and higher rates. But what does that mean and is it time to jump at higher rates or do they have some way to go?

Investment strategies

Death notices for the 60/40 portfolio are premature

Pundits have once again declared the death of the 60% stock/40% bond portfolio amid sharp declines in both stock and bond prices. Based on history, balanced portfolios are apt to prove the naysayers wrong, again.

Exchange traded products

ETFs and the eight biggest worries in index investing

Both passive investing and ETFs have withstood criticism as their popularity has grown. They have been blamed for causing bubbles, distorting the market, and concentrating share ownership. Are any of these criticisms valid?



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.