Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 213

Watch the low returns on 'high yield' debt

It is boom time once again for global ‘high yield’ debt. It’s great for borrowers wanting cheap debt with few conditions but bad for long-term investors. Both investment grade and high yield debt carry more leverage than 10 years ago but interest servicing costs are lower. In effect, lower interest rates have allowed corporates to borrow more without having to pay more in interest.

The first graph from Bloomberg on US high yield shows the breakdown of US high yield bonds into rating categories. Compared to a decade ago, the higher quality BB’s make up a greater portion of the index, with B’s much less than 20 years ago, and CCC’s shrinking since the days of the GFC. That’s a good thing, though it needs to be considered alongside two other factors that aren’t so positive.

The bad news for high yield investors is that covenant quality is worse than it has ever been. The graph below tracks the proportion of US and European sub-investment grade loans that have minimal or no covenant protection. Asia isn’t faring any better, covenant-light bonds are at 61% of issuance in Singapore and 72% in Hong Kong. Fewer covenants mean that sick companies are allowed to operate unchecked for longer. A lack of covenants increases the proportion of debt that suffers monetary defaults and reduces the recovery rate.

The last key characteristic to note is that spreads over base rates are near the lowest in the last 10 years. US High Yield bond spreads are shown below, but the story for European debt and leveraged loans is the same. There’s been a wave of loans being repriced in the US and Europe this year; situations where borrowers reduce the spread they pay, usually without providing any offsetting risk reduction. Borrowers clearly have the whip hand over lenders.

Spreads are now at the level where the B and CCC rated segments are barely positive if historical average losses are subtracted. Not surprisingly, many are saying that now is the time to be a contrarian and sell high yield. Edward Altman sees high yield conditions as bad as 2007 and Howard Marks similarly warned about conditions in his latest memo. The initial yields on offer may look comparatively high, but that’s no guarantee of high returns in coming years.

 

Jonathan Rochford is Portfolio Manager at Narrow Road Capital. This article has been prepared for educational purposes and is not a substitute for tailored financial advice. Narrow Road Capital advises on and invests in a wide range of securities.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.