Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 79

Watch your neighbour in managed funds

This short series looks at some product shortcomings which could materially affect whether an investment is appropriate. An investor wanting a broad exposure to the market in a single investment has three main alternatives: unlisted managed funds, listed investment companies (LICs) and exchange traded funds (ETFs). We will focus on some weaknesses in each of these three product types. The first part in the series looked at LICs, and this article goes inside managed funds.

The main problem for unlisted managed funds is that investments are combined with all other money in a pool, and the actions of others in the pool can adversely affect an individual. The ‘open-ended’ structure requires shares to be bought and sold within the fund as investors come and go. This contrasts with a ‘closed-ended’ product such as LICs where purchases and sales are made on market with other investors.

In the industry, it’s called ‘watch your neighbour’ – what are other investors in the pool doing?

Examples of unwelcome impacts of pooling

The pooling of investors can have a significant impact on the returns of an individual.

1.  Capital gains tax liability

When an investor withdraws from a fund, some shares may be sold to meet the redemption, potentially creating a capital gains tax liability. However, the capital gains liability does not go to the departing investor, but is left for those remaining in the fund when distributions are made. This can be a particular problem if many investors leave and few remain. When the fund makes its distribution, a large taxable capital gain liability may fall on the ‘last man standing’. In other words, because investors move into and out of managed funds at different points in time, taxation liabilities in respect of gains that benefited past investors may be passed on to subsequent or remaining investors.

2.  Loss of franking credits

Franking credits are only paid to investors receiving a distribution, and the value of the franking is not included in the unit price. An investor who departs a managed fund just prior to distribution leaves the full franking behind, and this may be a material part of the entire return. In fact, those in the know can arbitrage the fund if they know a large franking credit exists for a limited number of investors at distribution time. (Note, one fund recently started grossing up its unit prices for franking credits).

3.  Managers forced to sell as investors panic

Investors are notorious for selling when the market falls and buying when the market rises. This can be problematic for open-ended funds because portfolio managers may be forced to sell even when they think the market offers excellent value. If they have to meet redemptions and no new money is coming in, it does not matter what the manager thinks about the market. They become frustrated net sellers at discounts to their own valuations, then as the market recovers and inflows return, they become even more frustrated having to invest at higher prices. While one investor can remain patient, the fund is forced to act due to other investors in the same pool. A closed-end fund does not need to meet redemptions when prices are low nor invest when prices are high.

4.  Unrealised gains or losses

There is no allowance in the unit price for unrealised gains and losses in the portfolio, and this can have implications for the future taxation of the fund. Two funds may be otherwise identical but the one with large unrealised gains will give a higher capital gains tax liability to its investors after shares are sold than the one carrying unrealised losses.

5.  Suspension of withdrawals

During times of market disruption, such as experienced by mortgage funds during the GFC, the liquidity of the underlying assets may not be sufficient to match the level of redemption requests. The fund manager may have no choice but to suspend redemptions. Managers advise in their PDS something like:

“Any decision whether to process withdrawals will be made in the best interests of investors as a whole. Under abnormal market conditions, some normally liquid assets may become illiquid, and we may restrict or delay withdrawal payments.”

Again, the actions of some investors in panic mode may lead to the suspension of redemptions for the more patient and calm investors, and if the latter need to withdraw for some reason unrelated to the market, their funds might not be available.

6.  Converting capital to taxable income

Distributions from a managed fund are based on the number of units that an individual owns on the distribution date in proportion to all units in the fund. The unit price (similar to the price listed on the ASX) of the fund will fall by the amount of the distribution immediately after it is paid. An investor buying units immediately before a distribution may be generating a tax liability without a return on the investment. For example, assume a unit price of $2 and a 10 cent distribution on 7 July. On 8 July, the unit price falls to $1.90 and the investor may receive a taxable distribution of 10 cents. Capital has been converted to taxable income due to the timing of the investment.

Your neighbour can bite you

Managed funds are far more complicated than most investors realise, and behind the scenes, trustees often have to deal with problems related to fair treatment between unitholders. The investor who does not know the portfolio’s realised and unrealised capital gains, the potential loss of franking credits, the timing of distributions, the inflows and outflows of the fund and the risk of suspension is buying into a world of uncertainty.


Note that Graham will be presenting on SMSF Portfolio Construction at the SMSF Owners' Alliance Technical Workshop on 9 October 2014 in Sydney. For the full agenda, please see


Graham Hand was General Manager, Capital Markets at Commonwealth Bank; Deputy Treasurer at State Bank of NSW; Managing Director Treasury at NatWest Markets and General Manager, Funding & Alliances at Colonial First State. Nothing in this article constitutes personal financial advice.



July 01, 2017

Hi Lyn, ETF providers generally employ a concept known as “streaming” when dealing with redemption events. Only certain financial institutions are allowed to create and redeem units directly with the ETF provider (other investors buy and sell units on the stock exchange) and whenever they redeem units, any realised gains generated directly as a result of selling down assets to meet the redemption may be “streamed” or passed through to them directly. This means that the remaining unit holders should not have these taxable gains passed through to them as part of any future distributions.

Indeed one of the oft cited benefits of ETFs is their tax efficacy relative to managed funds, with streaming being one of the areas of difference in this regards

June 29, 2017


I have a question about CGT liability when invested in a managed fund. Is it possible to receive a CGT liability higher than the distribution you receive? My question comes after reading the following extract from an article written by Graham Hand on 10/9/14 titled "Watch your neighbour in managed funds."

"Capital gains tax liability: When an investor withdraws from a fund, some shares may be sold to meet the redemption, potentially creating a capital gains tax liability. However, the capital gains liability does not go to the departing investor, but is left for those remaining in the fund when distributions are made. This can be a particular problem if many investors leave and few remain. When the fund makes its distribution, a large taxable capital gain liability may fall on the ‘last man standing’. In other words, because investors move into and out of managed funds at different points in time, taxation liabilities in respect of gains that benefited past investors may be passed on to subsequent or remaining investors."

And I have the same question in regard to ETFs. Are they affected in the same way?

I would really appreciate a response. I would like to invest in managed funds or ETFs but don't want to leave myself open to that particular risk, if that is the case.

Thank you in advance for your time.

regards, Lyn

Warren Bird
May 03, 2017

There have been workarounds that the more client-focused managers have used to reduce the impact of some of these. EG where a large redemption from a fund would leave a large amount of income in a trust that the remaining unit holders would become entitled to, the trust could pay a special distribution so that the exiting investor got paid their share of the income.

However, there's been a change in the tax law that addresses many of these issues more effectively. The Attribution Managed Investment Trust regime was introduced in 2016. It's an opt in system for the fund managers that, among other things, means that they don't have to do workarounds and can attribute income to unit holders through the distribution period rather than having to treat those who are in the fund on 30 June as being 'entitled' to all the distributable income.

I'm not an expert on this. I've had to think about it for our managed funds at UFS. But i do think that every investor who uses managed funds should ask their advisers to check in with the managers they use about whether they're opting in or not.

(Graham - suggest Cuffelinks might get an expert to write some more about this.)

Oscar P
September 12, 2014

Thanks I will be talking to my adviser about these he never mentioned them before


Leave a Comment:


Most viewed in recent weeks

Stop treating the family home as a retirement sacred cow

The way home ownership relates to retirement income is rated a 'D', as in Distortion, Decumulation and Denial. For many, their home is their largest asset but it's least likely to be used for retirement income.

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 433 with weekend update

There’s this story about a group of US Air Force generals in World War II who try to figure out ways to protect fighter bombers (and their crew) by examining the location of bullet holes on returning planes. Mapping the location of these holes, the generals quickly come to the conclusion that the areas with the most holes should be prioritised for additional armour.

  • 11 November 2021

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 431 with weekend update

House prices have risen at the fastest pace for 33 years, but what actually happened in 1988, and why is 2021 different? Here's a clue: the stockmarket crashed 50% between September and November 1987. Looking ahead, where did house prices head in the following years, 1989 to 1991?

  • 28 October 2021

Why has Australia slipped down the global super ranks?

Australia appears to be slipping from the pantheon of global superstar pension systems, with a recent report placing us sixth. A review of an earlier report, which had Australia in bronze position, points to some reasons why, and what might need to happen to regain our former glory.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Are these the four most-costly words in investing?

A surprisingly high percentage of respondents believe 'This Time is Different'. They may be in for a tough time if history repeats as we have seen plenty of asset bubbles before. Do we have new rules for investing?

Investment strategies

100 tips from our readers for new investors

From the hundreds of survey responses, here is a selection of 100 tips, with others to come next week. There are consistent and new themes based on decades of experience making mistakes and enjoying successes.


What should the next generation's Australia look like?

An unwanted fiscal drain will fall on generations of Australians who have seen their incomes and wealth stagnate, having missed the property boom and entered the workforce during a period of flatlining real wages.


Bank results scorecard and the gold star awards

The forecasts were wrong. In COVID, banks were expected to face falling house prices, high unemployment and a lending downturn. In the recovery, which banks are awarded gold stars based on the better performance?

Exchange traded products

In the beginning, there were LICs. Where are they now?

While the competing structure, ETFs, has increased in size far quicker in recent years, LICs remain an important part of the listed trust sector. There are differences between Traditional and Trading LICs.


Should you bank on the Westpac buy-back?

Westpac has sent out details of its buy-back and readers have asked for an explanation. It is not beneficial for all investors and whether this one works for some depends on where the bank sets the final price.

Investment strategies

Understanding the benefits of rebalancing

Whether they know it or not, most investors use of version of a Strategic Asset Allocation (SAA) to create an efficient portfolio mix of different asset classes, but the benefits of rebalancing are often overlooked.


Six stocks positioned well for a solid but volatile recovery

The rotation to economic recovery favouring value stocks continues but risks loom on the horizon. What lessons can be drawn from reporting season and what are the trends as inflation appears in parts of business?



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.