Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 479

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 479 with weekend update

  •   13 October 2022
  • 10

The Weekend Edition includes a market update (after the editorial) plus Morningstar adds links to two additional articles.

There is a common frustration among investors and financial advisers that obtaining a single piece of advice - such as should I salary sacrifice? or should I invest or repay my mortgage? - involves a lengthy consultation process and a 70-page Statement of Advice. It increases the cost and complexity of financial advice and is a reason the Quality of Advice Review was commissioned. But it is easy to understand why it is necessary. How can anyone answer these questions without knowing a bigger personal picture, especially about long-term goals?

We're all different. I might think borrowing to invest in equities is too risky (yes, I do believe that at the moment) but another person might say we are near the best time for equity exposure, when markets are gloomy. They might be correct, as Ashley Owen's article explains this week, that recessions are usually good for stock returns. It's all in the timing and the cycle of investing, and maybe pessimism is a buy signal.

Our lifestyles are also different, especially the need to forgo something in the present in return for something in the future. Retirement security usually requires saving rather than spending, and buying a home rather than consuming, but plenty of people want the designer clothes, the flash cars, the fancy vacations and the latest tech. It's their life, their goals, their decisions, their consequences, making financial advice rarely a one-size-fits-all.

In car racing, a solid green flag is waved to start a race. In share markets, nobody waves a green flag to start taking on more risk. As famous asset manager, Howard Marks, said:

“I spend a great deal of my personal time trying to figure out one thing, which is, at a given point in time, how should you balance aggressiveness and defensiveness in your portfolio.” 

For example, stockmarkets in Australia and overseas kicked up strongly last week, in the hope that the pace of interest rate increases would slow. The S&P/ASX200 was up 4.5% last week, its best few days for two years. According to Calastone, managed equity funds in Australia enjoyed $3.5 billion of net inflows between July and September 2022, well up on the previous quarter. Overseas, BofA Securities reported:

"Last week, during which the S&P 500 rallied 1.5% off recent lows, clients were big net buyers of US equities ($6.1B; third largest inflow in our data history since '08 and the fifth consecutive week of inflows). Our view? More volatility likely ahead."

Get that. The biggest net buyers of equities since 2008. At the same time many are protecting their portfolios with cash, as central banks confirm further interest rate rises, as recessions loom and as Federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers appears on the news each night looking like he's swallowed a lemon, investors are piling into equities. The IMF update this week trimmed economic growth by 0.2% to 2.7% next year, and said:

"More than a third of the global economy will contract this year or next, while the three largest economies - the United States, the European Union and China - will continue to stall. In short, the worst is yet to come, and for many people, 2023 will feel like a recession." 

What is the answer if someone asks, "Is it a good time to buy CBA [or another stock]?" We all have different investment horizons. It can vary from a day trader who wants to know what's happening at that moment to trade CBA over a few hours. Then all the way to someone investing for a retirement lifestyle and income over 30 years, which involves a broad assessment of long-term markets and CBA's position in Australian banking.

So spare a thought for the financial adviser asked to give a single piece of advice, which legally they are not supposed to do anyway. We would not expect a doctor to recommend heart surgery without a lot of tests and a knowledge not only of personal health history but that of the patient's family. In recent weeks, ASIC's Financial Advisers Registry (FAR) has recorded a loss of about 500 experienced advisers bringing adviser numbers below 16,000 from a peak of double that. Most of the losses were due to advisers failing exams. There's a lot involved in answering what seem like simple questions.

And everyone is desperate for some expert guidance on where markets are going. In recent presentations, among the first questions directed to me have been, "What do you think of physical gold?" and "Where is the Australian dollar going?" I prefer to talk about long-term asset allocation and portfolio construction, and the audience wants my macro guesses. Someone arranging a conference recently asked me to present but then lost interest when I said I do not pick stocks. Some people get what they deserve.

While I might think someone is looking in the wrong place for their investments, something else is top-of-mind for them. I am reminded of a joke:

"One night, a policeman sees a drunk searching under a streetlight and asks what he's looking for. He drunk says he lost his keys, and the policeman starts searching under the light. After a while, the policeman asks if the drunk is sure he lost the keys there. The drunk replies, "No, I lost them over there in the park." The policeman asks why he is searching over here, and the drunk replies, “This is where the light is.”

In this week's edition ...

The Optus hack has raised the fear of identity theft, and at the same time, market participants are frustrated that financial market processes seem stuck in the dark ages, with many managed funds not changing their ID and application processes for decades. At a recent Connect Forum arranged by Calastone, Annick Donat, CEO of Clime Investment Management, said:

"This industry is highly regulated, but not to its benefit, not to anyone's benefit in the value chain or the ecosystem. And I sit here over three decades, and we're having the same conversation that we were having three decades ago. We've changed nothing, nothing at all. We've created more friction, not less. And we're supposed to be an advancing industry looking after people other people's money." 

We take a look at 'tokenisation' (terrible word) as a potential solution to the confidentiality problems faced by Optus and all financial institutions. How do we make investing easier without compromising the identity checks which are essential for public confidence and to prevent cyber crime? It's part of the blockchain revolution relevant to all of us as we seek to reduce friction without damaging our security.

Regardless of our market expectations, we need a place to invest our super, and Annika Bradley of Morningstar takes an independent look at the likely structure of the coming Vanguard offer, and how it compares with a similar fund currently available from the largest super fund in the country, AustralianSuper. These are valid alternatives for every SMSF investor (and look out next week for Meg Heffron's take on when an SMSF should be closed and the money moved to a public fund). 

In the almost 10 years of Firstlinks, one of the most-viewed topics was our extensive coverage of the franking credit proposals before the 2019 Federal Election. Although nowhere near the same scale as a policy, a new franking credit proposal from the Government is attracting plenty of attention, and Matthew Collins explains what the fuss is about.

It's Year 12 exam time, and Angus Dennis of Australian Ethical checks the latest subject changes in the Economics exam, and finds far more focus on externalities, private versus public goods and sustainability. Pass his thoughts to anyone sitting the exam in coming weeks, and best wishes to all students. 

Last week's article on homeowner-retirees not running out of money drew about 20,000 views and lots of comments, and we continue this theme with research by Helen Baker of on the expectations and aspirations of Australians heading into retirement.

Back to security fraud and the obvious connection to cryptocurrencies. While superannuation is usually at the conservative end of investing as retirees seek to preserve capital, SMSFs have invested about $1.5 billion in crypto assets according to ATO data, up from only $240 million in two years. It's a small part of the $840 billion in SMSF assets but likely to rise as more younger people establish their own funds with investing freedom.

Some SMSFs have been subject to crypto fraud, such as reported by The Australian Financial Review:

"Queensland-based cryptocurrency, digital asset exchange and brokerage Mine Digital has collapsed and control handed to external administrators, amid a dispute where it is being sued for allegedly not doing enough to weed out scammers from its platform." 

Dr Paul Mazzola and Mitchell Goroch look at how regulators should control the rapid growth of crypto.

In the two new articles for the weekend, Nicola Chand highlights five charts from a Morningstar report called an Industry Pulse on Australian banks, while Dave Sekera makes the case that US stocks are undervalued despite high inflation and weak economic growth.

This week's White Paper from VanEck called "In the Fed, we trust" looks at how completely the US Federal Reserve is determining the direction of bond and equity markets, and the implications.

Graham Hand


Weekend market update

On Friday in the US, the pessimism returned with the S&P500 losing 2.4% and NASDAQ down 3.1%. Tesla was a drag with shares off over 7% taking the loss since November 2021 to 50% as fears of recession added to misses on delivery schedules. 

From AAP Netdesk: On Friday, the local share market gained across the board after some extreme volatility on Wall Street overnight following the release of monthly United States inflation figures. The benchmark S&P/ASX200 index finished up 116.2 points, or 1.7%, to 6758.8 after US shares staged a massive comeback on Thursday in one of the biggest one-day reversals in Wall Street history. The Dow Jones surged 1,500 points off its lows and the S&P500 snapped its six-day losing streak to close up 2.6%.

Friday's rally wasn't quite enough to offset the losses on Monday and Tuesday and for the week the ASX200 closed slightly in the red. It is up 4.4% so far this month, but down 9.2% for the year.

The energy sector was the biggest gainer on Friday, rising 3.8% as Woodside climbed 4% to $33.95 and Santos added 4.4% to $7.80. Coalminer New Hope finished up 2.1% to an all-time closing high of $6.86, while Whitehaven Coal added 2.1% to $10.82. The big banks finished at their best levels in several months. Bank of Queensland, whose strong full-year earnings report on Wednesday apparently inspired the rally among its larger peers, finished up 1.6% to a five-month high of $7.73. In the heavyweight mining sector, BHP gained 2% to $40.02, Fortescue Metals rose 0.7% to $17.11 and Rio Tinto advanced 1% to $96.61.

From Shane Oliver, AMP: Shares had another volatile week that left US stocks down 1.6% for the week, Eurozone shares up 0.1%, Japanese shares down 0.1% and Chinese shares up 1%. The near-term downside risks for shares remain reflecting the array of macro risks – ultra hawkish global central banks, high and still rising recession risks, the $US still trending up on global safe haven demand risking a financial accident, ongoing policy mayhem in the UK, an escalation in the conflict in Ukraine and continuing downwards revisions to earnings expectations. And despite lots of bounces sharemarkets remain stuck around or just below their June lows, a decisive break of which could open up another 5-7% leg down. 

US September consumer and producer price inflation surprised on the upside with the CPI up 8.2% yoy and the core CPI up 6.6% yoy. While goods inflation continues to slow, services inflation is continuing to pick up driven particularly by strong gains in shelter (which is mainly rent), medical care and transport services. This will keep the Fed hawkish for now and on track for a 0.75% rate hike next month with the risk it does another 0.75% in December rather than slowing to 0.5%.

Latest updates

PDF version of Firstlinks Newsletter

Cboe Australia: Investor Day 2022, 20 October 2022. As financial markets are roiled by aggressive changes in monetary policy and shifting geopolitics, hear from leading local and global investment managers. Register to secure your spot.

ASX Listed Bond and Hybrid rate sheet from NAB/nabtrade

Indicative Listed Investment Company (LIC) NTA Report from Bell Potter

Monthly Investment Products update from ASX

Plus updates and announcements on the Sponsor Noticeboard on our website


October 15, 2022

Hi Graham. Given the fact that I am not one of the indeterminate amount of them* due to my knowing that "Patience is a virtue, and virtue is its own reward", your "[...] And everyone* is desperate for some expert guidance on where markets are going. [...]", given it's quite more'n 'a bit rich', warrants being included right up there with the risibly, resounding (c)raft of 'deepitys' and 'thought-terminating cliches', but I believe it could be (d)earth-shattering if true.

October 14, 2022

Can anyone explain to me why Eurozone shares, apart from holding up, aren't sinking like a lead balloon. I must be reading the wrong articles about the Eurozone economies.

SMSF Trustee
October 14, 2022

What? Down 20% over the past year not enough for you, stefy? Same as the US market.

Daryl La' Brooy
October 13, 2022

Graham, I'd like to correct a statement you've made above. According to FASEA, the body set up to examine advisers, that has now been scrapped, only about 9% or about 2,600 advisers failed the compulsory exam of the approximately 29,000 that were on the Financial Adviser Register as at 31 December 2018. The rest (around 10,000) have left the profession because the red tape has been too onerous which James McCracken alludes to in his comments above.

Graham Hand
October 13, 2022

Hi Daryl, I understand the gradual exodus is driven by red tape but why a sudden 500 in a few weeks? - a high-profile adviser, senior in the SMSFA structure, told me it was due to the exam results.

October 15, 2022

Graham the results of the final exam for existing advisers came out recently, those who failed this (presumably about 500 advisers) therefore had to leave the profession.

Graham W
October 12, 2022

James has a point but the problem is not an issue if he has an ongoing relationship with an advisor. Once the original SOA is done and especially if a review is done each year the advisor can provide advice on the current issue. Maybe spouse splitting or contributions could be considered. So if you don't have an ongoing relationship, find a good advisor.

James McCracken
October 12, 2022

I challenge your claim that a lengthy consultation and statement of advice is necessary. I may NOT want someone to advise me whether or not I should salary sacrifice, or whether I should invest or repay my mortgage. HOWEVER, I may want someone to provide me with information about the pros and cons of salary sacrificing (or answer particular questions like how it affects my personal super contributions). Similarly I might want to know the rules or issues inherent in refinancing a mortgage, or the intricacies of the operation of superannuation rules (eg. contribution limits, deductibility of contributions, various caps, etc). I may just want information that I can base my own decision on, I want to know how the system works to inform my decision. My personal circumstances and risk profile etc become irrelevant in this situation. (Let's face it, while it is prudent to tailor 'advice' to the person's individual situation, 'advice' comes with that many disclaimers that there is little comfort for the person receiving the advice.)

October 12, 2022

Hi James...from what you've written, it's evident to me that you're financially savvy. One couId, and p'haps should, enter into a pecunious pact with their financial adviser like something akin to a "no win, no fee", or a very low fee upfront with a bonus paid them later if their advice indeed shows substantive promise after an agreed amount of time. Caveat emptor. 

Legal options for loss on advice
October 22, 2022

Of interest is not whether a short and succinct answer can be given. But , lets say the advisor says yes buy CBA.... Then it tanks a week later will the client take action against the advisor for the loss, on the basis, I did not understand really, actually my wife had not told me we had a large expense arriving and the advisor did not ask about expenses arriving making investment wrong time, so sue the advisor for the loss. Another possibility James your will was leaving money to a child and the money came out of a joint account and the spouse takes action because the advice did not take this into account, and the proverbial tram arrived a week after the investment.

Should the above things be taken into account ?
If yes then a comprehensive approach is essential to protect all parties.
If not then limit legal liability so the advice can be succinct.


Leave a Comment:


Most viewed in recent weeks

Meg on SMSFs: Clearing up confusion on the $3 million super tax

There seems to be more confusion than clarity about the mechanics of how the new $3 million super tax is supposed to work. Here is an attempt to answer some of the questions from my previous work on the issue. 

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 566 with weekend update

Here are 10 rules for staying happy and sharp as we age, including socialise a lot, never retire, learn a demanding skill, practice gratitude, play video games (specific ones), and be sure to reminisce.

  • 27 June 2024

The secrets of Australia’s Berkshire Hathaway

Washington H. Soul Pattinson is an ASX top 50 stock with one of the best investment track records this country has seen. Yet, most Australians haven’t heard of it, and the company seems to prefer it that way.

Australian housing is twice as expensive as the US

A new report suggests Australian housing is twice as expensive as that of the US and UK on a price-to-income basis. It also reveals that it’s cheaper to live in New York than most of our capital cities.

Overcoming the fear of running out of money in retirement

There’s an epidemic in Australia that has nothing to do with COVID-19, the flu, or the respiratory syncytial virus. This one is called FORO, or the fear of running out of money in retirement, and it's a growing problem.

The catalyst for a LICs rebound

The discounts on listed investment vehicles are at historically wide levels. There are lots of reasons given, including size and liquidity, yet there's a better explanation for the discounts, and why a rebound may be near.

Latest Updates

Financial planning

Our finances should enable and not dictate our lives

Most people would prefer to have more money than less of it. But at what point do the trappings of wealth and success start to outweigh the benefits of striving for more?


This vital yet "forgotten" indicator of inflation holds good news

Financial commentators seem to have forgotten the leading cause of inflation: growth in the supply of money. Warren Bird explains the link and explores where it suggests inflation is headed.


Emerging market equities are ripe with opportunity

Emerging markets offer compelling value compared to history and the stretched valuations of developed market equities. Investors can benefit from three big tailwinds, but only if they are selective.


Tomorrow's taxpayers pay for today's policy mistakes

Less affordable housing isn't the only thing set to weigh on Australia's younger generations. If new solutions for pension deficits and the use of resource revenue aren't found quickly, tomorrow's taxpayer will foot the bill.

How would a switch to nuclear affect electricity prices?

The Coalition's plan to build seven nuclear power stations in 15 years faces scrutiny due to high costs and slow construction. And it is unlikely the investment would yield cheaper energy for Australian households and industry.


Reader feedback from our 2024 survey

Articles that are easy to understand, quick to read, and credible; being able to engage via the comments section; and keeping Firstlinks free and independent are just some of the features valued by our readers.


Have your say on Firstlinks and the topics we cover

We’d love to hear your thoughts on Firstlinks and how we can make it better for you. If you’d like to help us out in a just a couple of minutes, please take our short survey.



© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.