Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 479

Taming the Wild West of crypto needs a global approach

The Australian regulatory regime covering the complex world cryptocurrency is about to take shape. Assistant Treasurer and Minister for Financial Services Stephen Jones, who describes it as a "very opaque market", recently confirmed this initiative as a major priority for the Federal Government. The current push is expected to bring Australia in line with the US and the UK, who are in the process of tightening regulations following a number of crypto disasters likened to traditional banking crises.

The Government is turning up the heat on Treasury to progress work on the regulatory framework to cover the cryptocurrency industry and this article argues for a more global regulatory framework. 

Decentralised Finance (DeFi) - the new Shadow Banking Market

If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and acts like a duck, then it is a duck. This applies to the new era of shadow banking.

The modern era of shadow banking involves crypto platforms which facilitate borrowings and deposits in cryptocurrency. This is known as Decentralised Finance (Defi). The deposits which are made in cryptocurrencies offer higher rates of interest than are available from traditional banks. The funds raised by the crypto deposits are then directly loaned to speculators in the cryptocurrency of choice who bet on the price of the crypto asset going up. This market came into prominence in 2017 and has since gained in popularity, particularly with users who mistrust the banking system and the excessive fees charged by banks.

Faith in the DeFi network is based on the use of smart contracts and software protected by complex algorithms. The algorithms ensure that money is not released until all terms and conditions of the contract are honoured. Is this protocol enough to protect investors?

Celsius – a case study of DeFi failure

Celsius is a failed US-based DeFi company founded in 2018 by two fintech entrepreneurs, Alex Mashinsky, and Daniel Leon. It offered depositors lucrative interest rates of up to 17%. The company would advertise that:

"the only things that are certain in life are death, taxes - and the weekly payment from Celsius".

Here are the tweets where Alex Mashinky reassures investors prior to collapse.

Celsius filed for bankruptcy in July 2022. At its height, its volume of deposits peaked at $28 billion and the company boasted 1.7 million customers. The DeFi lender committed the major banking sin of mismatching the denominations of its crypto loans and collateral. So when the value of a borrower’s collateral was hit hard relative to the face value of their loan by the recent crypto crash, their loans were called-in. The negative sentiment surrounding the company’s financial situation sparked a ‘bank' run and investors sold down their investments in Celsius as fast as depositors closed their accounts. The realisation by customers that Celsius was not a licenced bank and protected by the US system of deposit insurance, accelerated its demise.

Here are the prices of Celsius over a few days and also six months.

Celsius (CEL/USD) price from 10-13 June 2022 (Source: CoinMarketCap)

Celsius (CEL/USD) price for 6 months to 11 October 2022 (Source: CoinMarketCap)

The regulatory journey

Unfortunately, Celsius is not the only DeFi network that has failed. Others such as Babel Finance, Three Arrow Capital and Voyager Digital have suffered the same fate.

The call for regulation of the crypto market is deafening and has prompted government enquiries across a number of jurisdictions such as the current Senate hearings in the US. Nascent attempts at regulation, for example in the UK and US, have to date been found grossly inadequate as disasters such as the Celsius debacle persist.

However, some headway is being made, particularly in the US by the introduction of the Lummis-Gillibrand Responsible Financial Innovation Act (RFIA), a bill that would create the first comprehensive regulatory framework of digital assets in the United States.  Additionally, the US publication of a recent report titled “Crypto Assets - Implications for Consumers, Investors and Businesses” identifies risks in the crypto markets and makes some further regulatory recommendations.

Australia is trailing the US in establishing a comprehensive crypto regulatory framework. Its first concrete efforts began in 2021. At this time, the Liberal Government undertook public consultation in respect to a licensing and custody regime for crypto asset secondary service providers. This initiative was a piecemeal approach which ignored an array of other market vulnerabilities.

The current Albanese Government is furthering this effort with a ‘token mapping’ exercise. Token mapping involves uncovering the characteristics of all digital asset tokens. This can only be seen as a first step in the regulatory process aimed at facilitating a more targeted approach. Public consultations will commence in November 2022.

Lessons from the banking industry

Similar to the banking industry, the crypto market is truly global. However due to its decentralised nature it allows participants to exploit regulatory differences between jurisdictions - that is, the practice of utilising more favourable laws in one jurisdiction to circumvent more restrictive regulation elsewhere.

The failure of DeFi businesses such as Celsius not only reveals flaws in the crypto ecosystem but the inability of regulation to protect the public. It’s important to note that the systemic risks of the crypto world spread beyond jurisdictional boundaries. Citizens globally are at risk of harm.

Lessons could be learned from the global banking system in which a universal approach to regulation setting is adopted - specifically through the Basel Accord. A co-ordinated and collaborative approach between governments in addressing regulatory shortcomings should be a consideration.

 

Dr. Paul Mazzola is a Lecturer in Banking and Finance in the Faculty of Business at the University of Wollongong, and Mitchell Goroch is a Cryptocurrency Trader and Researcher at the University of Wollongong.

This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any person.

 

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.