Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 381

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 381

  •   29 October 2020
  •      
  •   

Weekend market update

Both the US and Australian stock markets experienced their worst week for six months on the back of increasing COVID-19 cases in Europe and the US, and fears of a contested Presidential election. The S&P500 lost another 1.2% on Friday to take the week's losses to a hefty 5.6%, pushed down by NASDAQ stocks as the index retreated a further 2.4%. Australia was down 3.9% for the week giving back most but not all the gains made in the past month. 

***

There is a popular belief that retail investors do not even achieve index returns due to poor timing of investing and selling decisions. The theory is that they buy after markets rise as confidence grows, then sell in panic when markets fall, and miss the recovery. This 'buy high sell low' tendency loses the advantages of long-term investing and riding out the selloffs.

The recent evidence for this is far from convincing. For example, Morningstar in the US produces a 'Mind the Gap' report, and the 2020 version concluded:

"Overall, the gap between investor returns and reported total returns has shown notable improvement. As a whole, the returns that investors experienced were only slightly lower (by about 5 basis points per year) than reported total returns over the trailing 10-year period."

As Exhibit 1 shows, average investor returns have varied between 0.4% better to 1.35% worse than the market, depending on the category over 10 years, averaging an immaterial -0.05%.

In a 2019 study of Australian data, the results were even better, with the asset-weighted return for investors delivering 0.65% more than market returns over five years, although this was a period without whipsaw price changes.

However, annual research by Dalbar called Quantitative Analysis of Investor Behavior (QAIB) shows much worse investor results, usually underperforming the market by 3% or more over 10 years. For example, Dalbar says:

"The comprehensive study highlights the 10 key periods in which investors withdrew their investments during periods of market crises, which represent the 10 most severe cases of underperformance since 1984. Of these 10 cases, the QAIB found 8 cases would have produced better returns for the Average Investor one year later if they had taken no action and held on to their investments."

While the results of such studies are often disputed, stock markets have delivered strong results over the long term, and trying to time the market can indeed lead to poor results, such as missing a recovery. We saw it in the GFC and again in March 2020. It was Charlie Munger who said:

“Investing is simple, but not easy.”

This week we have two articles on this topic. Gemma Dale looks into the trading activity of nabtrade's retail clients during COVID-19 and describes three ways they invested during the pandemic. Not so dumb after all.

Then Tanya Hoshek reports on Russell's 'Value of Advice' research which argues that advisers help clients to avoid behavioural mistakes during periods of market disruption. Perhaps the educational messages are working.

Still on risk and investing mistakes, Josh Charlson takes a quick tour of 13 risks investors should check in their portfolios, recognising that accepting some of these is inevitable.

Bruce Apted looks at the performance of small cap versus large cap companies in Australia over 20 years and more recently. He gives his views on whether the smaller company price surge in 2020 can be sustained.

Tuesday 3 November in the US is shaping up as a momentous day, either leading down a path of four more erratic and unpredictable years under Donald Trump, or a more traditional Presidency but also filled with risks under Joe Biden. Analysts from First Sentier Investors and BNP Paribas Asset Management have short pieces on how the system works and possible consequences. UBS has provided this summary of the estimated impacts on S&P500 companies over 2021 and 2022 due to different policies.

There is a possibility that the result will take weeks to confirm, and the betting is Biden a $1.52 favourite and Trump at $2.90. My personal view is that Biden will win easily but even those who are disgusted by Trump's lies and character flaws must admit his rock-star rallies and boundless energy show impressive campaigning ability. He will be hustling on the hustings until the very end.  

As more investors turn to ESG investing, Rachel White gives four reasons why this trend will continue, and we can stop thinking of sustainable or ethical investing as anything other than mainstream.

Finally, a question many SMSF trustees must ask themselves as they ponder a sea change or tree change. Elizabeth Wang explores whether you can buy a retirement home now in your SMSF.

This week's White Paper from Western Asset looks at the problems facing the airline industry and how it may recover from the pandemic. It's relevant not only to Qantas and Virgin locally but Flight Centre, Webjet and Corporate Travel among many others.

Graham Hand, Managing Editor

Latest updates

PDF version of Firstlinks Newsletter

Australian ETF Review from Bell Potter

ASX Listed Bond and Hybrid rate sheet from NAB/nabtrade

Indicative Listed Investment Company (LIC) NTA Report from Bell Potter

Plus updates and announcements on the Sponsor Noticeboard on our website

 


 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Latest Updates

Planning

Will young Australians be better off than their parents?

For much of Australia’s history, each new generation has been better off than the last: better jobs and incomes as well as improved living standards. A new report assesses whether this time may be different.

Superannuation

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Investment strategies

A steady road to getting rich

The latest lists of Australia’s wealthiest individuals show that while overall wealth has continued to rise, gains by individuals haven't been uniform. Many might have been better off adopting a simpler investment strategy.

Economy

Would a corporate tax cut boost productivity in Australia?

As inflation eases, the Albanese government is switching its focus to lifting Australia’s sluggish productivity. Can corporate tax cuts reboot growth - or are we chasing a theory that doesn’t quite work here?

Are V-shaped market recoveries becoming more frequent?

April’s sharp rebound may feel familiar, but are V-shaped recoveries really more common in the post-COVID world? A look at market history suggests otherwise and hints that a common bias might be skewing perceptions.

Investment strategies

Asset allocation in a world of riskier developed markets

Old distinctions between developed and emerging market bonds no longer hold true. At a time where true diversification matters more than ever, this has big ramifications for the way that portfolios should be constructed.

Investment strategies

Top 5 investment reads

As the July school holiday break nears, here are some investment classics to put onto your reading list. The books offer lessons in investment strategy, financial disasters, and mergers and acquisitions.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.