Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 381

Why caution is needed in Aussie small companies

Small capitalised companies have had a great run since the market bottomed in late March. The S&P/ASX Small Ordinaries Index is up 60% since 24 March 2020, but by contrast, the larger capitalised companies as represented by the S&P/ASX100 index are only up 26.2% (as at 6 October 2020).

The significant outperformance of smaller companies has ignited renewed interest in this sector of the market. Figure 1 shows the two indexes since December 2019.

Figure 1. A wild ride in equities and even wilder ride in smaller companies

Greater returns but with more volatility

Over the last 20 years, smaller companies have outperformed larger companies by almost 0.86% per annum but this outperformance has not been without risk. On average, the volatility associated with small companies is 17% compared to larger companies with 13%.

This is also evident in the beta (a measure of volatility in terms of the overall market, which has a beta of 1 or 100%) of the small company index averaging 114%, as shown below.

Figure 2. Longer term return and risk characteristics from Australian small and large companies

Smaller companies have had a great run in the last six months but a look at the long term puts that outperformance into some context.

Figure 3 illustrates the journey for the last 20 years. Smaller companies have had periods of significant outperformance, which are historically followed by periods of underperformance. Depending on when you invest, your experience could be quite varied.

Figure 3. Periods of outperformance have historically been followed by periods of underperformance

Valuations are rich in absolute and relative terms

On average, over a longer period of time, we find the smaller capitalised companies tend to trade at a slightly higher price to earnings (P/E) multiple and generate slightly lower yields. But this tends to be volatile, as during risk-on periods they can trade at much higher multiples, whereas during risk-off periods, they can trade at below average multiples.

It is entirely possible that the economy will recover and many company earnings will return to pre-pandemic levels, but if they don't, then the small company sector of the market is more at risk of disappointment. From a relative yield perspective, the smaller companies are not as expensive as is implied by earnings multiples.

Figure 4. Smaller company valuations

Watch out for overly optimistic earnings

For smaller companies compared with larger companies, the investment community is usually overly optimistic on earnings. In the last 20 years expected growth for the next 12 months has averaged +21.1% and yet on average this group of companies has only delivered +13.2%. By contrast, the expected growth for larger companies is expected to be lower at only +9.4% and has only delivered +6.8%. It's a much smaller earnings disappointment compared to smaller companies. In both cases, analysts’ expectations have been overly optimistic but in the case of smaller companies, this optimism is exaggerated.

As investment managers that focus on quality, value, improving outlook and lower volatility, we tend to invest in less volatile companies that have not been priced for excessive growth. That does not mean we will not invest in smaller companies if they are expected to provide the right mix of return for risk.

Indeed, as Figure 5 below highlights, we currently own many companies outside the top 50 but within the top 200, but our active weight in these companies changes.

Figure 5. State Street Australian Equity Fund – Active weight to different sized companies since inception^

 

Currently, valuations are stretched for the market and are especially stretched to the smaller end of the index. Most of this has happened in the last six months as investors have been willing to price a strong recovery in earnings.

 

Bruce Apted is the Head of Portfolio Management – Australia Active Quantitative Equities, at State Street Global Advisors. This general information has been prepared without taking into account your individual objectives, financial situation or needs and you should consider whether it is appropriate for you. 

 

  •   28 October 2020
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Has passive investing killed small caps?

Why the ASX is losing Its best companies

Australian shares struggle as 2020s reach halfway point

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

The housing slide could become a crash

House prices are sliding across Australia, yet the most dangerous ingredient for a housing crash is still missing. If job losses surge amid growing economic risks, today's correction could become a historic property downturn.

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Division 296: the initial moves to make before the windows close

What if the best superannuation strategy isn't about earning more, but acting before your options disappear? Several overlooked planning windows are narrowing, with consequences that can last for decades.

Planning

Avoid unnecessary CGT with this estate planning clause

A simple estate plan can create a ticking time bomb. One overlooked clause can pit spouses against children, delay inheritances, and potentially leave a family facing an unexpected tax bill worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Exchange traded products

The hidden trade-off in fixed income ETFs

Some investment trade-offs are immediately visible. Others are embedded in the way a portfolio is constructed. Understanding the difference may explain why similar-looking investments can produce surprisingly different results.

Retirement

The mortgage free retirement is fading

What happens when a generation reaches retirement carrying obligations previous generations largely avoided? New research suggests we may need to rethink both how much we need in retirement and what life could look like.

Retirement

The key question to inspire a confident and purposeful retirement

Most people spend decades planning for retirement. Far fewer plan for what happens when they get there. The difference may explain why so many find the transition harder and less fulfilling than expected, despite careful preparation.

Latest from Morningstar

Making the case for a 'good enough' portfolio

Some investors spend years chasing the perfect strategy. Others choose a path that’s simply good enough and move on. Which approach is more likely to deliver both better outcomes and a happier financial life over the long run?

Investment strategies

Is the US market as expensive as CAPE says?

Many investing ideas survive for decades. But that does not make them right. A famous valuation measure implies that US shares are dangerously expensive, but the evidence may point to a very different conclusion.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.