Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 562

What poker can teach us about investing

It’s 2014 at the end of Super Bowl XLIX with 26 seconds left. The Seattle Seahawks were down by four points against the New England Patriots. The Seahawks were on the Patriot’s one-yard line just outside the end zone and it was only the second down1. It was a golden opportunity for the Seahawks to snatch a victory.

Seahawks coach Pete Carroll called a timeout and told his quarterback to pass the ball instead of making a running play. The quarterback passed. But the Patriots intercepted the ball, and the Seahawks lost a game that they looked like they were about to win.

Coach Carroll was crucified by fans for the passing decision. Many see it as the worst call in Super Bowl history, perhaps all of NFL history!

But was it a bad decision?

Former World Series of Poker Champion and cognitive behaviour expert, Annie Duke, thinks not. In her book ‘Thinking in Bets: Making Smarter Decisions When You Don’t Have All the Facts’, Duke highlights that, based on 15 years of NFL data, the probability of a short pass interception is below 2%.

The Seahawks were much more likely to score a touchdown or make an incomplete pass that would have barely used any clock time (and doesn’t count as a down).

If a touchdown results, you’re a genius who won the game doing what the opposition didn’t expect you to do. While an unsuccessful running play loses precious time off the clock and only allows time for one more play.

Just because the low probability event happened (an interception), it doesn’t make it a bad decision by the coach. Duke sums it up nicely:

“What makes a decision great is not that it has a great outcome. A great decision is the result of a good process, and that process must include an attempt to accurately represent our own state of knowledge.”

The takeaway: in games where there is chance, and the probabilities aren’t certain (i.e. 100%), you can’t judge a decision by a result.

So-called ‘resulting’ is what poker players call the tendency to judge a decision based on its outcome rather than its quality. Investors need to avoid ‘resulting’ at all costs.

Two decades of trusting our process

At Ophir, we are highly focused on the ‘process’ principle at the portfolio level.

As long-time readers will know, we (Andrew Mitchell and Steven Ng) started out as Australian small-cap investors around 15-20 years ago. Then, as our most successful ‘Aussie’ investments increasingly became global as they expanded overseas, we launched into global small caps some six years ago.

Through that time, the ideal company in which we invest has not changed. It is typically A$500 million to $10 billion in market cap, growing revenue and profits above the market (so generally 10%+ per annum), taking market share, and growing into a big end market wherever that is in the world.

We strongly believe, and the evidence backs it up, that earnings drive company share prices in the long term. You can see this in the chart below where revenue growth, changes in margins and free cash flow all add up to earnings growth, which dominates as the driver of share market returns over time. And providing you don’t overpay for that above-average earnings growth, you give yourself a great chance of generating attractive investment returns and beating the market averages.

Key drivers stock performance – S&P 500 (1990-2009)

Source: Morgan Stanley Research

We also believe that one of the best indicators of above-average earnings growth over the longer term is strong earnings growth today that is beating market expectations.

If you were a fly on the wall in our investment team meetings, you would hear us focussed on how confident we are that our portfolio companies are likely to beat the market’s expectations for revenue and profit growth at their next result.

This, however, doesn’t guarantee you good investment returns in your portfolio in the short term. Changes in valuation multiples (yellow bar above), both at a stock and portfolio level, can swamp the fundamentals of revenue and earnings growth.

This was particularly the case in late 2021 to mid-2022 in our funds, and in particular our Global Funds, where despite still overwhelmingly getting the earnings right, valuation multiples decreased to a degree not seen since the GFC for the entire cohort of small-cap growth-orientated businesses globally, which is of course the pond that we fish in.

Why we’re happy with this process … despite

But we are also focussed on the ‘process’ principle for individual holdings, as the example of Altium shows.

Altium (ASX:ALU) is an Australian stock we held last year in the Ophir High Conviction Fund (ASX:OPH). It makes the most widely used software for the design and manufacturing of printed circuit boards.

But towards the end of 2023, one of our analysts warned us there was going to be an earnings hole at the first half 2024 result due in February 2024.

If we are highly confident an earnings miss is looming at an upcoming result, we will either down-weight the position or sell to zero. In this case the instruction was clear: get out entirely!

Just weeks later, in mid-February, Japanese chipmaker Renesas Electronics lobbed a takeover bid for Altium at $68.50 – a circa 34% premium to the closing price of the company’s shares the day before, valuing the business at A$9.1 billion in an all-cash deal.

Our analyst was livid and there was definitely a few swear words in the office! We had lost the chance at significant outperformance by selling the stock early.

Were we (Andrew and Steven) upset at the lost performance opportunity? No!

The reason is simple: The analyst did all the correct work, as part of our process and made the right call with the information they had at the time.

We will never hold onto a company because a takeover offer might be lobbed – the probability is usually just far too small and uncertain.

Low and behold, in late February when Altium came out with its result, it reported a big miss to earnings, that, but for the takeover offer, would normally have seen the stock fall upwards of -30%.

Altium (ALU) share price and earnings

Source: Bloomberg

Our analyst made the right call based on the percentages – a recommendation to sell Altium based on a likely upcoming earnings miss – and this isn’t invalidated due to a small-probability left-field takeover offer effectively rendering the earnings miss meaningless.

 

1 For non-NFL fans, in American Football you get four attempts to move the ball at least 10 yards up the field. The first of these tries is “first down”, the next “second down” and so on. Once they make it 10 yards or further the downs reset and it’s back to first down.

 

Andrew Mitchell and Steven Ng are co-founders and Senior Portfolio Managers at Ophir Asset Management, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

Read more articles and papers from Ophir here.

 

6 Comments
Steve
May 31, 2024

It is possible to shift the odds in your favour. Example roulette. Roughly 50/50 chance of red or black (the green number "0" gives the house an edge). Payout is 1 to 1. Some people simply double up if they lose and keep doing until the red or black they are betting on "inevitably" comes up. $1, $2, $4, $8 etc. When you win you recover all your accumulated losses and have the initial sum bet as a profit. Reset and repeat. Why doesn't this work in the real world? Casinos have table limits which prevents never ending doubling. Of course the bigger the initial bet, the larger each subsequent bet. Casinos also ban people who win too often! But it shows that if you can place enough bets on something with a predictable outcome (ie always a 100% payout when you do eventually win in the above example) then you can reduce the risk of losing.

Andrew Mitchell
June 03, 2024

Interesting Steve - been a looong time since I've played roulette. Law of large numbers sees betting against the house a tough proposition at scale!

Jordan M
May 31, 2024

Thanks Andrew. Do you take the odds of a takeover into account when analysing a stock? Seems a lot of M&A is happening, but how you assess the probabilities is the question...

Andrew Mitchell
June 03, 2024

Outside of a few special situations generally not. The types of businesses we tend to invest in (growth at a reasonable price) don't tend to get bid for that much. We'd rather focus where our skill set is in identifying companies where growth trajectory is mispriced.

Rafael F
May 30, 2024

Resulting is rife, and it's not only in the share market and in sports. Some very rich people played 1000 to 1 odds and won, while some not so rich played much better odds and lost. But that's not what people assume. The key is to play when the odds are stacked in your favour, not run out of money when you lose, and keep repeating the process until you eventually win and win big.

Andrew Mitchell
May 31, 2024

Good points Rafael! Always be careful calling someone a genius when they win and the odds are stacked against them or an idiot when they lose but the odds were in their favour.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

The catalyst for a LICs rebound

What super funds and their fund managers now think

Five strategies to match your investing to your behaviour

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

What to expect from the Australian property market in 2025

The housing market was subdued in 2024, and pessimism abounds as we start the new year. 2025 is likely to be a tale of two halves, with interest rate cuts fuelling a resurgence in buyer demand in the second half of the year.

The perfect portfolio for the next decade

This examines the performance of key asset classes and sub-sectors in 2024 and over longer timeframes, and the lessons that can be drawn for constructing an investment portfolio for the next decade.

Retirement is a risky business for most people

While encouraging people to draw down on their accumulated wealth in retirement might be good public policy, several million retirees disagree because they are purposefully conserving that capital. It’s time for a different approach.

Howard Marks warns of market froth

The renowned investor has penned his first investor letter for 2025 and it’s a ripper. He runs through what bubbles are, which ones he’s experienced, and whether today’s markets qualify as the third major bubble of this century.

The challenges with building a dividend portfolio

Getting regular, growing income from stocks is tougher with the dividend yield on the ASX nearing 25-year lows. Here are some conventional and not-so-conventional ideas for investors wanting to build a dividend portfolio.

How much do you need to retire?

Australians are used to hearing dire warnings that they don't have enough saved for a comfortable retirement. Yet most people need to save a lot less than you might think — as long as they meet an important condition.

Latest Updates

Property

Affordability issues cap further house price rises

If the RBA starts cutting rates, many believe house prices will rebound strongly. Yet, the numbers on affordability suggest prices can’t rise much further without making housing impossibly expensive for most Australians.

Superannuation

How to shift into pension mode

How do you start accessing your super funds when you stop working, or maybe even before you stop working? This covers the basics, including how to switch your super accumulation account to an account-based pension.

Taxation

Reform overdue for family home CGT exemption

The capital gains tax main residence exemption is no longer 'fit for purpose', due to its inequities, inefficiency, and complexity. Here are several suggestions for adapting or curtailing the concession.

Investment strategies

The two key risks facing investors

In 2024, markets were buoyed by decent economic growth and US rate cuts, even as valuations became stretched. This year, more resilient portfolios may be needed to tackle risks from higher bond yields and market concentration.

Superannuation

Why systemic risks from ‘Big Super’ may be overplayed

What are the implications of ‘Big Super’ for our economy, financial markets and population? New research looks at the beneficial, detrimental and debatable aspects, spanning current impacts and potential future developments.

Property

What AI’s ‘Sputnik moment’ means for data centres

What we know about DeepSeek so far could be a mixed bag for data centre owners like Goodman Group. However, it's worth remembering that AI adoption isn't the only thing that matters to the industry's outlook.

Gold

Will 2025 be another banner year for gold?

Last year, gold surged 38% higher in Australian dollars, fuelled by investment demand and global risks. This year's outlook suggests potential for continued gold strength amid geopolitical uncertainties and currency vulnerabilities.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.