Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 184

Some active managers succeed while the majority struggle

The active versus passive debate rolls ever onwards, and Cuffelinks has published many articles from both sides of the debate. For example, Chris Cuffe has explained how he picks active managers that have outperformed the index over the years, while we have reported in the past on the S&P Indices Versus Active Funds (SPIVA) Australia Scorecard.

According to S&P’s latest report to June 2016, the majority of active Australian equity and bond funds continue to consistently underperform their benchmarks.

However, while it’s not pretty overall for most active managers, there are sectors where active does well, and it’s possible to identify active opportunities in sectors where passive managers are more successful overall. Even if the majority of active funds do not justify their fees, it does not mean that it's not worth finding those managers who do add value consistently.

The report evaluated the performance of 608 Australian equity funds (large, mid, and small cap, and A-REITs), 294 international equity funds, and 66 Australian actively managed bond funds over one, three, and five-year investment periods.

SPIVA’s annual scorecard is now in its 14th year and serves as “the de facto scorekeeper of the active versus passive debate”, the report states.

“There is no consistent trend in the yearly active versus passive index figures, but we have consistently observed that the majority of Australian active funds in most categories fail to beat the comparable benchmark indexes over three- and five-year horizons,” the report adds.

Flat year, flat funds

In a year in which the S&P/ASX200 was almost as flat as a pancake, registering only a 0.56% gain, Australian large-cap equity funds posted an average return of 0.09%, with close to 60% of them underperforming the S&P/ASX 200. Over the five-year period, 69% of funds in this category underperformed the benchmark.

Large-cap funds were not alone. The majority of ASX equity funds underperformed benchmarks over all three time frames. International Equity, Australian Bond, and A-REIT funds were the worst performers over the three time frames.

A-REITs big relative underperformers

A-REIT funds recorded an average return of 22%, lagging the S&P/ASX 200 A-REIT benchmark by 2.5% over the 12-month period. The majority of funds lagged the benchmark, with 87.5%, 93.1%, and 92.4% underperforming over the one, three, and five-year horizons respectively.

Adrian Harrington, head of funds management at Folkestone Limited, said success as an active A-REIT fund over the long run depends on the management and their investment approach. The smaller conviction-based funds don’t worry about benchmark weights and are not bound, like bigger A-REIT funds, to invest in the ASX200. The top six managers in the A-REIT sector outperform the index, usually because they manage smaller, high-conviction funds that can invest in individual A-REITs based solely on merit.

The larger funds, he said, had been victims of their own success:

“They have so much money that they’re bound by rules which prohibit them from stepping far outside the high market-cap property stocks. Westfield and Scentre comprise 36% of the index, while the top eight stocks comprise 80%, so it’s very highly concentrated. Those funds have to hold a certain percentage of Stockland or Mirvac stock in their portfolios, regardless of whether they like them as investments or not. The index has nearly a 60% exposure to retail shopping centres, which is ok in boom times but in reality represents a higher investment risk during periods of more normalised returns.”

Mid and Small-Caps outperform over longer term

The majority of ASX Mid and Small-Cap funds lagged their indexes over the shorter one and three-year periods, but a healthy 62% outperformed the benchmark over the five-year period by an average of 3.6%, and some by a far more significant margin.

Glennon Capital Managing Director Michael Glennon said he was not surprised by the longer-term result. “Small cap managers understand markets and businesses and they have a feel for momentum. To invest solely in small caps you need to understand what the market has an appetite for and what is behind a company’s growth story.”

Glennon said small-cap funds are not constrained by weightings and can pretty much invest in whatever they like. “The companies we invest in can potentially double their market caps in a relatively short space of time, whereas a $25 billion fund is not likely to grow to $50 billion in just a few years.”

International equities, bonds poor relative performers

The S&P Developed Ex-Australia LargeMidCap recorded a return of 0.9% over the 12-month period. However, international equity funds posted an average loss of 2.1%, and 80.7% of those funds underperformed the benchmark. Over 90% of international share funds underperformed the benchmark over the three and five-year periods.

The average return of international equity funds consistently lagged the S&P Developed Ex-Australia LargeMidCap by more than 2.6% in the three and five-year periods.

The S&P/ASX Australian Fixed Interest Index gained 7% in the 12 months to June, while Australian bond funds recorded a smaller average gain of 5.6%. Some 89.5% of funds underperformed the benchmark, while 92.2% and 88.7% of funds lagged the benchmark over the three and five-year periods respectively.

Funds merging and liquidated

Five per cent of Australian funds from all measured categories merged or were liquidated over the year ending in June. International equity funds disappeared at the fastest rate (6.9%).

ASX funds had an overall survivorship rate of 78.4% over the five-year period. Bond funds had the highest rate of survival (83%), while international equity funds had the lowest, with more than a quarter either merging or being wound up.

 

Alan Hartstein is Deputy Editor of Cuffelinks.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

The opportunity cost of low fee structures

Good active managers are hard to identify

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Three steps to planning your spending in retirement

What happens when a superannuation expert sets up his own retirement portfolio using decades of knowledge? He finds he can afford much more investment risk in his portfolio than conventional thinking suggests.

Finding sustainable dividend stocks on the ASX

There is a small universe of companies on the ASX which are reliable dividend payers over five years, are fairly valued and are classified as ‘negligible’ or ‘low’ on both ESG risk and carbon risk.

Retirement income promise relies on spending capital

The Government has taken the next step towards encouraging retirees to live off their capital, and from 1 July 2022 will require super funds - even SMSFs - to address retirement income and protect longevity risk.

Among key trends in Australian banks, one factor stands out

The Big Four banks look similar but they are at fundamentally different stages as they move to simpler business models. Amid challenges from operating systems, loan growth and neobank threats, one factor stands tall.

Why mega-tech growth are the best ‘value’ stocks in the market

They are six of the greatest businesses ever and should form part of the global portfolios of all investors. The market sees risk in inflation and valuations but the companies are positioned for outstanding growth.

How inflation impacts different types of investments

A comprehensive study of the impact of inflation on returns from different assets over the past 120 years. The high returns in recent years are due to low inflation and falling rates but this ‘sweet spot’ is ending.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Retirement income promise relies on spending capital

The Government has taken the next step towards encouraging retirees to live off their capital, and from 1 July 2022 will require super funds - even SMSFs - to address retirement income and protect longevity risk.

Superannuation

How retirees might find a retirement solution in future

Superannuation funds need to establish a framework that offers retirees a retirement income solution that lasts a lifetime. It will challenge trustees to find a way to engage that their members understand and trust.

Investment strategies

Dividend investors, your turn is coming

Dividend payments from listed companies, depended on by many in retirement, have lagged the rebound in share prices over the past year. Better times are ahead but sources of dividends will differ from previous years.

Investment strategies

Four tips to catch the next 10-bagger in early-stage growth

Small cap investors face less mature companies with zero profit that need significant capital for growth. Without years of financial data to rely on, investors must employ creative ways to value companies.

Investment strategies

Investing in Japan: ready for an Olympic revival?

All eyes are on Japan and the opportunity to win for competing athletes. After disappointing investors for many years, Japan is also in focus for its value, diversification and the safe haven status of its currency.

Fixed interest

Five lessons for bond investors from the Virgin collapse

The collapse of Virgin Australia not only hit shareholders, but their bond investors received between 9 and 13 cents in the $1. A widely-diversified portfolio can tolerate losses better than a concentrated one.

Investment strategies

The 60:40 portfolio ... if no longer appropriate, then what is?

The traditional 60/40 portfolio might deliver only 1.5% above inflation in future without diversification benefits. Knowing an asset’s attributes rather than arbitrary definitions is better for investors.

Retirement

Two factors that can transform retirement investing

Retirees want better returns but they have limited appetite to dial up their risk exposure in order to achieve it. Financial advice and protection strategies in portfolios can enhance investment outcomes.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.