Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 274

Active or passive ETFs: how do you decide?

Working for an Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) manager, investors might presume that I’ll always favour a simple passive index-tracking ETF. Whilst I may think that indexing is the way to go most of the time because of the instant diversification, lower costs, and the historical inability of the majority of active managers to outperform their benchmarks, active strategies have their role in portfolios.

However, as an investor, how do you decide which approach to use?

The evolution of ETFs

Exchange traded products have gone through an evolution over the years like products in other industries:

  1. At first there were passive index-tracking ETFs which seek to mirror the performance of a specific investment index, and which often utilise a simple market-cap weighted methodology or aim to track a specific commodity or currency, or group of commodities and currencies.

  1. Then came smart beta or rules-based exchange traded products, typically using a systematic investment approach. Some of these approaches can still be index tracking. However, such indices typically go beyond market-cap weighted methodologies and may consider factors like size, value and volatility as an alternative weighting methodology. Other products may not track an index but still use a prescriptive set of rules as part of their investment objectives (for example, yield-oriented buy-write strategies or funds that aim to provide short exposure to share markets).

  1. More recently, active ETFs have portfolio managers making decisions on the underlying portfolio composition and do not try to mirror the performance of any underlying index. Instead, typically the manager’s main goal is to outperform a benchmark index by actively trading or changing sector allocations.

What should an investor take into consideration when deciding whether to select active or passive investment strategies? Here are three considerations:

1. How efficient is the underlying market?

There are segments of the market that are inefficient, giving an opportunity to exploit mis-pricing and potentially deliver outperformance, or ‘alpha’. Active management or smart beta, rules-based strategies may do better. Two examples are hybrids and small cap markets.

In hybrids, an active manager can potentially add value over an index-tracking approach by accessing deeper liquidity and improved trading costs, with specialist knowledge to assess the complex and varied issuance terms of securities, and the ability to sell securities when they become overvalued.

In small caps, we believe that most of the outperformance in the sector can be achieved over market cycles, by identifying and avoiding companies with undesirable investment characteristics. This can be achieved with some sensible screens, delivered in a cost-effective way via an exchange traded product.

2. Where are we in the market cycle?

When a momentum-driven market is generally moving higher, there may be no need to look at active or smart beta strategies. “A rising tide lifts all boats” is the saying, and just having exposure to the right sector may be all that is needed.

However, as a market peaks and corrects, market pull backs and risks may be mitigated by using a strategy that is active or rules-based, which will hopefully have exposure to higher quality securities that will be less affected by the fall.

High volatility or trendless markets present another opportunity for active and smart beta strategies to take advantage of specific securities or sectors. Or alternative strategies that are defensive, or not as correlated to rest of the market, can also shine.

Yield strategies have always been popular with Australian investors. A few years ago, most yield stocks performed well. The market environment is different today. Banks may struggle to grow their earnings and therefore their share prices in the years ahead. There is some prospect that interest rates could rise again, which would impact interest rate sensitive investments, and many market observers feel the top 20 stocks on the ASX will have a more difficult time.

For funds with a specific income objective, active management can add value above a passive strategy by navigating the markets in changed market conditions. Specific strategies aim to deliver an attractive, tax-effective and low volatility income stream that can increase with inflation, targeted at retirees and low-tax paying investors.

3. Is the added cost for active or rules-based strategies worth the money?

Shopping for any product is about value. A top quality shirt may cost more but with longer wear, it might cost less in the long run. The same goes for investing. Will there be enough outperformance in the long term to justify the added cost? Management fees eat into returns and, although an active manager may outperform their benchmark, after considering their fees may underperform.

The cheapest Aussie equities exposure in the world is currently the BetaShares Australia 200 ETF (ASX:A200), with a management fee of 0.07% per annum. However, this is a market cap-weighted index and potential outperformance may come from a smart beta approach such as Fundamental Indexing. It is also available via an ETF and has outperformed the market cap-weighted index over the long term by about 2% per annum*, but with higher fees.

In summary, active, rules-based and passive strategies can be used in conjunction with one another and should be considered as part of a diversified portfolio.

 

*Source: Bloomberg. FTSE RAFI Australia 200 Index v S&P/ASX 200 Index, 1992 to June 2018. Does not take into account ETF fees and expenses. You can’t invest directly in an index. Past performance is not indicative of future returns.

 

Justin Arzadon is a senior member of the Distribution team at BetaShares, a sponsor of Cuffelinks. This material has been prepared as general information only, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. You should seek your own financial advice before making any investment decision.

For more articles and papers from BetaShares, please click here.


 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Global ETFs: insights into a multi-trillion-dollar industry

Australian ETFs: end of year reviews 2018

Fight cybercrime by investing in cybersecurity

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Welcome to Firstlinks Election Edition 458

At around 10.30pm on Saturday night, Scott Morrison called Anthony Albanese to concede defeat in the 2022 election. As voting continued the next day, it became likely that Labor would reach the magic number of 76 seats to form a majority government.   

  • 19 May 2022

Keep mandatory super pension drawdowns halved

The Transfer Balance Cap limits the tax concessions available in super pension funds, removing the need for large, compulsory drawdowns. Plus there are no requirements to draw money out of an accumulation fund.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

30 years on, five charts show SMSF progress

On 1 July 1992, the Superannuation Guarantee created mandatory 3% contributions into super for employees. SMSFs were an after-thought but they are now the second-largest segment. How have they changed?

Investment strategies

Anton in 2006 v 2022, it's deja vu (all over again)

What was bothering markets in 2006? Try the end of cheap money, bond yields rising, high energy prices and record high commodity prices feeding inflation. Who says these are 'unprecedented' times? It's 2006 v 2022.

Taxation

Tips and traps: a final check for your tax return this year

The end of the 2022 financial year is fast approaching and there are choices available to ensure you pay the right amount of tax. Watch for some pandemic-related changes worth understanding.

Financial planning

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Infrastructure

Listed infrastructure: finding a port in a storm of rising prices

Given the current environment it’s easy to wonder if there are any safe ports in the investment storm. Investments in infrastructure assets show their worth in such times.

Financial planning

Power of attorney: six things you need to know

Whether you are appointing an attorney or have been appointed as an attorney, the full extent of this legal framework should be understood as more people will need to act in this capacity in future.

Interest rates

Rising interest rates and the impact on banks

One of the major questions confronting investors is the portfolio weighting towards Australian banks in an environment of rising rates. Do the recent price falls represent value or are too many bad debts coming?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.