Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 596

An alternative asset class for income-seeking retirees

Imagine conducting extensive pre-purchase due diligence on a local business that generated $1,500,000 in net profit last year. Now, imagine you acquire it for $10 million, concluding the purchase price is neither a bargain nor unreasonably high. Finally, you hire managers and staff to oversee its day-to-day operations, allowing you to collect distributions without actively running the enterprise.

Fast-forward one year: the company has delivered an outstanding performance, generating 33% growth in net profit to $2,000,000 – a yield of 20%. You take home the $2,000,000 as a dividend and anticipate further growth, thanks to a nearby competitor’s failure. You also test the market for a possible business sale and receive three offers. Despite the business’s improving profitability and growth, these are all below your original $10 million purchase price.

Naturally, you decline.

Another year passes, and the growth rate of the company’s profits accelerates to 50%, and profits rise to $3,000,000. The yield on your original purchase price is 30%, and a few prospective buyers have knocked on the door, offering to buy your business for less than the $10 million you originally paid.

How do you feel about the business’s market value being less than you paid? 

I imagine, as you read this, you are thinking the buyers are either idiots or ‘bottom feeders’ and that their proposed valuations are irrelevant. And you would be right to reach those conclusions. It should be abundantly clear that the external valuations are irrelevant when the business is healthy, growing, and delivering a substantial, increasing cash flow every year.

Why do our conclusions change with listed companies?

So why do our conclusions change when the business in question is listed on the stock market? Why is it that even if the business is growing its profits, we fret over every small daily move in the share price? Why do we fear a crash in the share price of these businesses?

The reason is complex. We might consider the collective wisdom of markets as superior to our own – the market may know something we don’t. However, we may also have retirement-related obligations to sell some of the securities each year, and if the share prices collapse, we will be forced to sell more securities than we would otherwise have to in meeting our pension payment obligations.

The aim of investing in equities

In equities, our aim should be to acquire a portfolio of outstanding businesses that continually increase their free cash flow and reliably pay - and grow - their dividends. Alternatively, we will do equally well, and perhaps even better, over the long term, buying businesses that have the capability of increasing their dividend payments, even if they retain their profits to reinvest at very high rates of return.

When you own such enterprises, day-to-day market fluctuations should be far less concerning. And while you can rely on the businesses’ dividend streams, rather than fretting over fluctuating share prices, the fluctuations can have adverse impacts.

Mitigating sequencing risk

Sequencing risk - the danger that poor returns early in retirement can rapidly deplete a portfolio when combined with withdrawals - can only partly be mitigated by owning high-quality stocks with predictable, growing dividends.

If the dividend income from a share portfolio is insufficient to meet retirement income stream obligations, you will be forced to sell shares. And if the portfolio has been impacted by a stock market correction caused by geopolitical or macroeconomic shifts (outside of your control) the result is fewer remaining shares to do the heavy lifting of recouping the losses.

From the age of 65 to 74, superannuation income stream beneficiaries must currently withdraw 5% of their retirement account balance (as at the 2023/24 financial year).

Minimum percentage factor for certain pensions and annuities (indicative only) for each age group

Age

Under 65

65-74

75-79

80-84

85-89

90-94

95 or more

2023-24 onwards

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

9.0%

11.0%

14.0%

Note: These withdrawal factors are indicative only. To determine the precise minimum annual payment (especially for market linked income streams), refer to the pro-rating, rounding and other rules in the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Regulations 1994. Source: www.ato.gov.au

If the yield on an equity portfolio is 3%, the difference – 2% – needs to be achieved by selling some of the shares. There is nothing to worry about if the stock market has risen by circa 10% as the S&P/ASX200 has done over the last 12 months. But if the market falls 20%, more shares need to be sold at lower prices to achieve the required payment.

This is why, occasionally, the Government reduces the minimum withdrawal amount required for account-based pensions and annuities to mitigate the adverse impact of lower prices, as it did between 2020 and 2023.

Is there an alternative to equities?

But what if there was an asset class that offered yields of 7-10% each year, paid cash income every month, had a long track record of never posting a negative month and exhibited very low volatility in its unit price?

By way of example, suppose your portfolio was hypothetically invested in a spread of private credit funds that eschewed lending to property developers altogether, yielded 7 or 8%, paid a mix of monthly and quarterly income and has historically offered substantially less volatility than public equity markets.

For retirees aged 65 to 74, they could withdraw their 5% super income stream and reinvest the remaining 2 or 3% into the private credit funds, diversify into equities or pass the funds to kids and grandkids for much needed school fees, for example.

From the age of 75 to 79, retirees are required to withdraw 6%, from 80 to 84, 7%, and from 85 to 89, 9% (refer to table above). Hypothetically, if invested in a diversified portfolio of private credit funds paying 8%, retirees would not need to draw down on their capital until they reached the age of 85 – a full 20 years after retirement.

Of course, there are risks with any asset class, and that’s where financial advisers are worth their weight in gold. They can help assess whether private credit aligns with your financial goals, risk tolerance, and income needs. The point, however, is that there are now alternatives to equities that may offer more desirable cash flow characteristics for retirees.

The bigger picture

While 2023 and 2024 provided the backdrop of rising equity markets – something we predicted and wrote about extensively - 2025 and 2026 may offer investors an opportunity to reflect on the virtues of diversifying into private credit. Especially if investing $10 million into an unlisted local business growing its net profit by 50% per year is not an option!

 

Roger Montgomery is the Chairman of Montgomery Investment Management and an author at www.RogerMontgomery.com. This article is for general information only and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

 

7 Comments
SGN
February 01, 2025

I quote from the above article
"Of course, there are risks with any asset class, and that’s where financial advisers are worth their weight in gold. "
Really Weight in Gold ?

Brian
February 03, 2025

The median adviser weighs 82.5 kg.
(sorry, cannot reveal my 'sauce'!)
So 'worth' about A$ 12 million.
Some might say a bargain.

Dan
January 31, 2025

The author talking his book, again.

Who is borrowing from the private credit providers? What risk are the lenders taking on? Dudley provides an example.

One has to ask why the big banks don't want to lend to those who are borrowing. Why are they seeking private (and more expensive ) credit. The answer is because it's risky business.

Mercifully the author notes inherent risk, albeit earlier inferring low risk ("long track record of never posting a negative month and exhibited very low volatility"). If it were low risk, it wouldn't offer returns of 7-10%.

Beware.

Steve
February 01, 2025

The logic of never losing money was the root cause of the GFC. As housing (as a total entity) never lost money in the US, all you had to do was generate more loans. Missing was the key historical role of a high deposit (used to be 20% min) to act as a buffer and the extremely shonky loans to people with little or no credit rating so the broker could pocket their commission. We saw how that ended.

Phil Pogson
January 30, 2025

This is pretty much what authors and investors Steven Bavaria and Steve Selengut have been teaching for several years.

Dudley
January 30, 2025

Risk. Example:
https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/aph-loses-control-over-1-billion-forest-hill-office-project-20240813-p5k220.html
'mortgagee Metrics Credit Partners'

Tony Reardon
January 30, 2025

We have been running our SMSF since 2007 and both my wife and I are in our seventies so conscious of withdrawal obligations. We are also conscious of inflation and longevity issues and have adopted a current asset allocation with all these factors in mind.

The assets are split approximately 42.3% equities, 47% cash/fixed interest and 10.7% property/infrastructure and, in 2023/24, the fund generated 5% in interest and dividends together with a profit of 12.3% which is very pleasing. Long term average returns from this asset mix are a respectable 7.8%.

In 2026/27 we will have to distribute 6% so more than anticipated income but maturing fixed income investments will be more than adequate without any need for capital sales at possibly poor times.

We do little trading and do not chase the latest and greatest ideas as we are not looking to shoot the lights out but to maintain an income and capital base for our foreseeable future and so far things are working fairly well.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Retirement myths doing more harm than good

Protecting retirement income from inflation shocks

The potential and perils of increasing franking credits

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Raising the GST to 15%

Treasurer Jim Chalmers aims to tackle tax reform but faces challenges. Previous reviews struggled due to political sensitivities, highlighting the need for comprehensive and politically feasible change.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

9 winning investment strategies

There are many ways to invest in stocks, but some strategies are more effective than others. Here are nine tried and tested investment approaches - choosing one of these can improve your chances of reaching your financial goals.

Latest Updates

Taxation

100 Aussies: seven charts on who earns, pays, and owns

The Labor government is talking up tax reform to lift Australia’s ailing economic growth. Before any changes are made, it’s important to know who pays tax, who owns assets, and how much people have in their super for retirement.

7 key charts on the state of the Australian property market

The Australian property market stirs fierce debate - often bullish optimism versus crash predictions. But beyond the noise, seven charts reveal what's really driving prices and the outlook for residential real estate.

A simple alternative to the $3 million super tax

Division 296 aims to introduce improved fairness into the superannuation system, yet is overly complex. This scours the world for better ideas and suggests a simpler alternative which can achieve the same goals.

CBA and the index conundrum for super funds

After the hyperbolic rise in CBA shares, super funds are floating the idea of carving out the weightings of ASX bank securities and indexing them within their portfolios. This looks at why that might be a big error.

Strategy

10 policies to drive Australian productivity higher

Here's a comprehensive list of proposed reforms to fix Australia's stagnating economy, including introducing a flat income tax rate, reducing migration, and making childcare tax-deductible.

Interviews

Where to find big winners in Asia

As more money looks for a home outside the US, Asia may soon get some love. Fidelity's Anthony Srom outlines the best places in Asia to invest, including in Chinese consumer names, Indian financials, and Thailand.

Investment strategies

We have trouble understanding the time value of money

We overvalue the present and underestimate the future - it’s a cognitive glitch called hyperbolic discounting. It affects savings, spending, and loans, and it's more common - and costly - than we think. 

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.