Home / 172

Annuities have come a long way

The practice where I work as an adviser has, for various reasons, predominantly attracted older senior clients over the years. While we do have a growing number of wealth accumulators, there has been a strong focus on retiree, seniors and ageing-related issues.

One would think then that we have been signing our clients up to annuities left, right and centre for a long time. However, until this year, this hasn’t really been the case. The recovering share market of recent years, strong franked dividend yields from ‘defensive’ market sectors and low interest rates have made annuities relatively uninteresting as a long-term investment option for most of our client base.

Until recently, that is. This year we’ve noticed a major shift in investment attitudes, and suddenly those in their advanced years are looking at annuities with increasing interest, even with current interest rates at record lows.

We’ve seen more global uncertainty in 2016 than at any time since the GFC. Brexit, falling fuel and oil prices, wars, political uncertainty, a slowing Chinese economy, and record low bond yields are contributing to a wary economic outlook and elderly investors are nervous about their share market exposure. Couple that with some innovative annuity enhancements over recent years and changes to the age pension assets test kicking in on 1 January 2017 and suddenly annuities are on the radar.

What is an annuity?

An annuity is simply a guaranteed income stream purchased from a life company with a lump sum. The payments are promised up front by quotation, so the investor knows what they’re signing up for from the outset. The ‘guarantee’ does not refer to a government guarantee that applies to bank accounts and term deposits. However, the life companies are closely regulated and their reserving requirements make their guarantees solid.

The annuity can be paid until the holder dies (a ‘lifetime’ annuity), or for a fixed number of years (a ‘term’ annuity). It can be linked to inflation, or not, and can have a residual amount paid back at the end of the term. The annuitant chooses the features that determine the income level.

By way of illustration, let’s look at an investment amount of $100,000, and how the features selected change the income that it pays. The results in the table below are based on quotations received from a leading annuity provider on 5 September 2016 for a 70-year-old male with monthly annuity payments. Note for these quotes, I have not included upfront or ongoing Adviser Service fees – these can also be built in to the quotations.



What sets annuities apart from term deposits is their tax and social security treatment. Term annuities that only pay out the interest component (100% RCV) are basically the same as term deposits, but nil RCV and lifetime annuities have distinct advantages.

In the 7 year, nil RCV, nil indexation example above, the tax and social security rules recognise that a large portion of the $15,807 payment is in fact return of capital. That return of capital is calculated simply as:


With $14,286 of the $15,807 annuity payment considered return of capital, only $1,521 is assessed as taxable income and income-tested income.

Life expectancy (taken from the Australian Life Tables 2010-2012) is the denominator when the calculation is on a lifetime annuity. So for the lifetime examples above, the return of capital amount is:


This is more than the actual income the annuity pays, so no income is assessed for tax or Centrelink purposes.

Under the Assets Test, the return of capital is deducted off the purchase price each year to determine how much counts.

Who wants annuities?

Jack and Mary are in their late 70s and in good health. They’ve sold their home and bought into a retirement village, leaving $360,000 of capital to invest. They have an existing share portfolio and are comfortably living off the dividends and their part age pension. However, the pension is set to halve as a result of Centrelink counting the capital released from the home as an asset, then halve again from 1 January 2017 with the new Assets test.

They are adamant that they do not want any further share market exposure, and term deposits are not appealing with their low rates. We showed them an annuity product that guarantees income for the life of the annuitant and has a ‘withdrawal guarantee’ that allows a guaranteed amount to be withdrawn after 15 years, if required.

Lifetime annuities of old lost their appeal as there was little or no guarantee that any capital would be repaid from it after purchase. But recent products have largely solved this problem and allows for a withdrawal amount along the way up to 15 years.

Annuities can also have generous tax, income and asset test treatments compared with term deposits, so over time Jack and Mary’s age pension may improve at a faster rate than if they had invested in term deposits, fixed interest or shares.

Suitable for older clients who dislike market volatility

Then there’s Keith and Leanne, each about 80 years old and utterly risk averse. They are attached to their age pension and, like Jack and Mary, have downsized and unlocked capital from their home that is going to eat into their pension now and from 1 January. They were looking for something with no market volatility that would also allow their pension benefits to increase over time.

They chose two 7-year annuities with nil RCV. Splitting the investment by half to give them an annuity each, they now have a known cash flow and optimised age pension. If one passes away before the 7-year term expires, the annuity continues to the survivor. If they both pass away, the estate will continue to receive the payments until the term is complete, or it can opt to get a lump sum payout.

Then we have Neville, who is single with $2 million in rolling term deposits. Shares (or managed funds) were never an option for him. While not a pensioner, Neville was equally determined to qualify for whatever government benefits he could, and his attachment was to the Commonwealth Seniors Health Care card. The interest on the term deposits was going to disqualify him from holding that card.

Neville had made provision for $500,000 worth of cash bequests and wanted to retain at least that much for his estate. In his words, he wanted an investment that provided the same or similar level of capital security as term deposits with a competitive return and tax efficiency.

Again, the lifetime annuity that provides for a withdrawal guarantee came into play, his taxable income was reduced so that he retains his CSHC card.

Annuities generally don’t make for lively dinner conversation. Those that remember the old products are surprised that, given global economic volatility and product innovation, they are more appealing now.


Alex Denham is a Senior Adviser with Dartnall Advisers in Berrima. Prior to becoming an adviser, she spent 20 years in senior technical roles with several financial services companies. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.


Overcoming loss aversion in retirement income

Retirement income products - what's ideal?

Longevity risk solutions for retirees


Alex Denham

September 14, 2016

The rule change that came in on 1 January 2015 affects account-based income streams only. Non-account based annuities such as lifetime annuities and fixed term annuities with a term of greater than 5 years (unless life expectancy is less than 5 years) continue to be assessed using the deductible amount formula. Short-term annuties (less than 5 years) are deemed.

Rafal Chomik

September 12, 2016

As far as means-test treatment, I thought that since 2015, deeming rates apply when determining the amount counted in the income test, and these are unaffected by actual amount of annuity income or capital returned.

Bruce Gregor

September 08, 2016

Very useful article. The longer the term of the annuity (particularly lifetime) the more you need to be convinced the providing company will remain solvent throughout your lifetime. To my knowledge there are no government guarantees in Australia like the $250,000 bank term deposit guarantee. A drop in yields like we have now is a big risk for annuity companies.

Warren Bird

September 14, 2016

Yes, I'm always a little concerned when I read someone saying that, because insurance companies have to hold reserves and are regulated by APRA, that makes them safe. It doesn't. If, for example, the investment policy of the reserves is risky, then they might not provide much protection when it's most needed. HIH had a lot of reserves, but they were invested in very poor quality assets and that contributed to their demise.

Some insurers are rated AA as a credit risk, but some are rated lower than that. Without naming names, one of the popular annuity providers is rated BBB+. That's investment grade, but it's a credit rating level that I would always prefer to have no more than 5% of my portfolio invested in any one credit.
The point is that having annuities with several providers, with smaller amounts invested through those with lower credit ratings, is part of the risk management strategy. The odds of losing capital are really small, but what you are managing is the consequences that flow from something going wrong. (Tail risk.)

Sorry if that sounds like a lot of work, but you can't look at annuities as an easy way out of having to manage investment risk. Even if they are marketed that way.

An alternative way to get a similar outcome is to buy a few well managed corporate bond funds, with perhaps a bit of equity income thrown in as well. Reinvest the distributions, but set up a regular withdrawal at a similar % rate as the going annuity rate. You don't have the same guarantee of return, but you get the cash flow, you get diversification and you get the flexibility to withdraw some capital should you later find that you need it. You create your own annuity in a way.

Seek advice first, as always, but please ask your adviser to fully explain to you the investment risks of any strategy. Annuities will suit some people, but not others and there are other ways of getting the same result.


September 08, 2016

Interesting to see how life annuities are being used but it is unclear if/how the return of capital amount is recalculated each year.


Leave a Comment:


Most viewed in recent weeks

Most investors are wrong on dividend yield as income

The current yield on a share or trust is simply the latest dividend divided by the current share price, an abstract number at a point in time. What really matters is the income delivered in the long run.

My 10 biggest investment management lessons

A Chris Cuffe classic article that never ages. Every experienced investor develops a set of beliefs about how markets operate.

Seven major trends affecting Australians in retirement

Retirement planning will become increasingly complex in the face of trends in home ownership, wealth dispersion, life expectancy, health and aged care costs, work patterns and pension dependency.

Lessons from the Future Fund for retail investors

The Annual Report from Australia's sovereign wealth fund reveals new ways it is investing in fixed income and alternatives. The Fund considers its portfolio as one overall risk position with downside protection in one asset class allowing more risk in another.

Four companies riding the healthcare boom

There are strong demographic trends in ageing and consumer spending and investing in the right healthcare companies can ride this wave as well as produce better health outcomes for people. 

Five reasons SMSFs are making asset allocation changes

Substantial changes are underway in SMSFs which until recently held a narrow range of assets dominated by cash, term deposits and Australian equities. Trustees have never faced so many choices.




Special eBooks

Specially-selected collections of the best articles 

Read more

Earn CPD Hours

Accredited CPD hours reading Firstlinks

Read more

Pandora Archive

Firstlinks articles are collected in Pandora, Australia's national archive.

Read more