Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 108

Feeling lucky? Another stock market spike in China

So far this year we have seen good returns from all asset classes (except cash), in Australia and globally. Shares are fully priced or over-priced but they are still doing better than their long term averages. Likewise with listed and unlisted real estate. Bonds are horribly over-priced but they too have generated above average real returns.

In a world where everything is doing well for investors something is bound to go wrong. It is impossible to over-weight (or under-weight) everything in portfolios so it calls for tough decisions. How long can the great 2012-15 QE rally last?

Here is a close look at the incredible spike in the prices of Chinese stocks in the last year, linked back to the perennial culprits – banks and the credit cycle.

The Shanghai index has shot up 120% in the past 12 months after five years of falls. Less well known is that this is a rather mild spike compared to past episodes.

There have been two great stock market spikes in post-1949 China. Both were fuelled by credit binges and both promptly crashed when credit dried up. In 1991-1993 the index gained 900% in 24 months but then lost 90% of the gains in the next 12 months. In 2006-2007 the index gained 450% in 24 months, but also promptly lost 90% of the gains in the next 12 months.

There was an orgy of bad lending in the 1985-1993 credit binge by the big Chinese state-owned banks. To end the party the government had to impose a total freeze on lending in late 1993. That crunched asset prices, employment, the economy and the banking system, and it took the next 12 years to clean up the mountain of bad debts in the banks.

As soon as it did, the next great credit/property/stock market bubble took off in 2006-2007, fuelled by cheap credit and geared-up local and global investors chasing the ‘China growth’ story. The boom ended in a crash in 2008 when credit froze as the global banking system seized up.

In the ensuing global financial crisis, the Chinese government embarked on a massive spending and credit spree to support the economy. The bubble re-appeared firstly in housing and then moved on to shares last year when housing prices started to fall. Driving the current boom are cashed-up first-time local punters, many using margin debt, and the spike is now being chased by foreigners eager to get in on the action.

The current stock market rally is quite modest by comparison to past bubbles and pricing levels are still not stretched – for example price/earnings ratios and dividend yields are not outlandish. The market may run up a lot further from here but banks are hiding another mountain of bad debts built up in the post-GFC lending binge, and so this boom will probably end the same way as previous episodes.

 

Ashley Owen is Joint CEO of Philo Capital Advisers and a director and adviser to the Third Link Growth Fund. This article is educational only. It is not personal financial advice and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

 

  •   8 May 2015
  • 2
  •      
  •   
2 Comments
Jerome Lander
May 08, 2015

There are a lot of Chinese stock promotors who will be making a fortune from this "government-blessed" equity rally and indeed "feeling luck"! The market is still treated like a casino by Chinese locals and short term speculation is running hot currently in the expectation of strong short term gains. It is a not a good market for long term index investors (what is these days!).

Australia's own Bronte Capital (global long/short manager) is well known for exposing examples of fraudulent Chinese stocks previously. It is absolutely imperative to understand who and what you are investing in there.

Chris
May 14, 2015

Absolutely Jerome, I could not agree more !

I have very close Chinese friends and some of them treat the stockmarket as a casino, speculating in companies they know nothing about, and if it goes up, they think it is because "they are lucky (as though they played a game well)" (they just don't know how ironic that statement is - it was blind luck)

There was also an interview in the April 2015 edition of AFR Smart Investor re: a firm that had uncovered some shocking Chinese fraud.

The joke is that the SEC could have done something against NYSE listed Chinese stocks when they found that some of them had been less than truthful, but didn't. Getting real information out of China is extremely difficult because most of the companies are SOEs and therefore, anything that the Party believes is a "State Secret" will not be released (including real financial data).

How on earth you are supposed to make an accurate investment decision in that environment is beyond me. As a long-term investor, the best that I can hope for is an ETF that covers Chinese stocks and as a part of an overall strategy (I use iShares IAA and IEM), because I sure wouldn't individually pick them nor put all my Asian exposure onto China.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Are Chinese investors still on training wheels?

Why China’s property market matters

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

The investment that sidesteps the new tax traps

Tax rules have changed, but many investors are still using yesterday’s strategies. Insurance bonds may offer advantages for those seeking greater control, tax efficiency and certainty about their wealth.

Testamentary trusts have secured the CGT exemption

Treasury’s latest CGT reform draft delivers a win for testamentary trusts and deceased estates, exempting estate-derived gains from the 30% floor. However, questions on death and divorce rollovers remain unresolved.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Latest Updates

Planning

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Investment strategies

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Economy

Population growth masks Australia’s productivity problem

For years, investors have benefited from a seemingly reliable growth story. But recent national accounts raise uncomfortable questions about what has really been driving Australia’s economy and whether that can continue unchecked.

Investment strategies

Why tomorrow’s winners may not be today’s index leaders

The stocks that built retirement balances over the past decade now dominate many portfolios. The new challenge is whether these companies can continue meeting the increasingly high expectations embedded in today's share prices.

Investing

What earnings surprises reveal about future returns

Sometimes the most important information in an earnings result isn't the number itself. It's the possibility that the market's assumptions have been fundamentally wrong and future earnings may look very different.

SMSF strategies

Individual SMSF Trusteeship directly liable for ATO fines

A rarely discussed detail buried in SMSF structures could dramatically change who wears the cost when something goes wrong. With penalties rising, a decision many dismissed as administrative may deserve a second look.

Investment strategies

The currency bet you didn’t know you made

Buying global shares means making two bets: on the companies and on the Australian dollar. Most investors consciously choose only the first. Last financial year, the second bet cost 8.5% in returns for many investors.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.