Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 108

Feeling lucky? Another stock market spike in China

So far this year we have seen good returns from all asset classes (except cash), in Australia and globally. Shares are fully priced or over-priced but they are still doing better than their long term averages. Likewise with listed and unlisted real estate. Bonds are horribly over-priced but they too have generated above average real returns.

In a world where everything is doing well for investors something is bound to go wrong. It is impossible to over-weight (or under-weight) everything in portfolios so it calls for tough decisions. How long can the great 2012-15 QE rally last?

Here is a close look at the incredible spike in the prices of Chinese stocks in the last year, linked back to the perennial culprits – banks and the credit cycle.

The Shanghai index has shot up 120% in the past 12 months after five years of falls. Less well known is that this is a rather mild spike compared to past episodes.

There have been two great stock market spikes in post-1949 China. Both were fuelled by credit binges and both promptly crashed when credit dried up. In 1991-1993 the index gained 900% in 24 months but then lost 90% of the gains in the next 12 months. In 2006-2007 the index gained 450% in 24 months, but also promptly lost 90% of the gains in the next 12 months.

There was an orgy of bad lending in the 1985-1993 credit binge by the big Chinese state-owned banks. To end the party the government had to impose a total freeze on lending in late 1993. That crunched asset prices, employment, the economy and the banking system, and it took the next 12 years to clean up the mountain of bad debts in the banks.

As soon as it did, the next great credit/property/stock market bubble took off in 2006-2007, fuelled by cheap credit and geared-up local and global investors chasing the ‘China growth’ story. The boom ended in a crash in 2008 when credit froze as the global banking system seized up.

In the ensuing global financial crisis, the Chinese government embarked on a massive spending and credit spree to support the economy. The bubble re-appeared firstly in housing and then moved on to shares last year when housing prices started to fall. Driving the current boom are cashed-up first-time local punters, many using margin debt, and the spike is now being chased by foreigners eager to get in on the action.

The current stock market rally is quite modest by comparison to past bubbles and pricing levels are still not stretched – for example price/earnings ratios and dividend yields are not outlandish. The market may run up a lot further from here but banks are hiding another mountain of bad debts built up in the post-GFC lending binge, and so this boom will probably end the same way as previous episodes.

 

Ashley Owen is Joint CEO of Philo Capital Advisers and a director and adviser to the Third Link Growth Fund. This article is educational only. It is not personal financial advice and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

 

  •   8 May 2015
  • 2
  •      
  •   
2 Comments
Jerome Lander
May 08, 2015

There are a lot of Chinese stock promotors who will be making a fortune from this "government-blessed" equity rally and indeed "feeling luck"! The market is still treated like a casino by Chinese locals and short term speculation is running hot currently in the expectation of strong short term gains. It is a not a good market for long term index investors (what is these days!).

Australia's own Bronte Capital (global long/short manager) is well known for exposing examples of fraudulent Chinese stocks previously. It is absolutely imperative to understand who and what you are investing in there.

Chris
May 14, 2015

Absolutely Jerome, I could not agree more !

I have very close Chinese friends and some of them treat the stockmarket as a casino, speculating in companies they know nothing about, and if it goes up, they think it is because "they are lucky (as though they played a game well)" (they just don't know how ironic that statement is - it was blind luck)

There was also an interview in the April 2015 edition of AFR Smart Investor re: a firm that had uncovered some shocking Chinese fraud.

The joke is that the SEC could have done something against NYSE listed Chinese stocks when they found that some of them had been less than truthful, but didn't. Getting real information out of China is extremely difficult because most of the companies are SOEs and therefore, anything that the Party believes is a "State Secret" will not be released (including real financial data).

How on earth you are supposed to make an accurate investment decision in that environment is beyond me. As a long-term investor, the best that I can hope for is an ETF that covers Chinese stocks and as a part of an overall strategy (I use iShares IAA and IEM), because I sure wouldn't individually pick them nor put all my Asian exposure onto China.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Are Chinese investors still on training wheels?

Why China’s property market matters

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

How to minimise tax with a will

Inheritance tax implications in Australia may surprise some, as poor estate planning without proper wills or trusts can lead to costly tax bills and delays for beneficiaries.

Testamentary trusts post-budget: Estate planning, tax reform and the ‘death tax’ debate

Proposed Budget changes to taxation are casting new uncertainty over testamentary trusts, prompting closer scrutiny of estate planning structures and the real implications of reforms still taking shape.

Meg on SMSFs: The CGT changes don’t impact super but what about Div 296 tax decisions?

New CGT rules could tip the scales in the super vs non-super debate. For those facing the Division 296 tax, the case for withdrawing has gotten more complex. A "comparison rate" tool may help assess decisions.

High quality businesses are on sale

Beneath the dominance of the ASX's largest stocks, much of the market has been left behind. High-quality companies are now trading at levels rarely seen, offering opportunities for investors willing to look deeper.

The strange effect of the 30% minimum capital gains tax

The 30% minimum tax on capital gains sits at the heart of the budget's proposed reforms. Yet the mechanics reveal anomalies that introduce unexpected distortions that raise questions about its design.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 667 with weekend update

The downfall of the giant and three lessons for investors.

  • 18 June 2026

Latest Updates

Latest from Morningstar

Ranking three common retirement strategies

The defining challenge of retirement isn't just about building wealth, it's about converting your lifetime savings into sustainable income. A holistic understanding of different strategies can improve long-term outcomes.

Economy

Was life really better in the good old days?

Are we worse off than previous generations? Lately, there seems to be a heightened level of angst that economic conditions are getting harder and that the two-party political system (and maybe democracy too) is failing voters.

Retirement

Australia has saved $4.5 trillion for retirement. Here's what matters more

Most Australians approaching retirement can tell you the exact dollar value of their super account. But success depends on more than a sizeable balance. Here's four key questions to ask yourself at the start of the financial year. 

Who gains in an AI-supercharged economy?

AI is already reshaping the economy, but companies building transformative technologies rarely capture the greatest long-term value. Instead, those benefits accrue to the users. We may well see this pattern reproduced. 

Taxation

Div 296's million-dollar reset worth $25,000

The 'cost base reset' for the new super tax is being sold as protection for pre-July gains. A worked example shows $1M of protection is worth about $25,000, and the real deadline has not passed.

Latest from Morningstar

The forecasting fix that Wall Street missed

Asking whether markets are overpriced may be the wrong question. New research suggests that traditional valuation metrics used to forecast returns may have been misread. Here are five takeaways for investors.

Investment strategies

Should a fund manager invest their own money differently?

Investors often like the idea that fund managers should invest client money exactly as they invest their own. But reality is more complicated. Unique circumstances make a different approach rational and, at times, beneficial.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.