Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 409

$17.7 billion aged care plan welcome but many will miss out

On Tuesday, 11 May while all eyes were on the Federal Budget, the Government released its response to the Final Report of the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety.

The report details the response to the 148 recommendations of the commissioners in the form of a three-phase, five-year, five-pillar plan. The government has accepted (or accepted in principle) 126 of the recommendations, with the remaining recommendations subject to further consideration and six not accepted at all.

Importantly the plan also details how the investment of the $17.7 billion announced in the budget will be spent.

Among the six recommendations rejected is an aged care levy to fund the system and changes to the means testing arrangements that would have seen pensioners have their accommodation and cost of living met by the government. The recommendation to phase out lump sum Refundable Accommodation Deposits (RADs) is subject to further consideration and will form part of the reformed Residential Aged Care Accommodation framework which will also look at changes to accommodation design standards.

The big tickets in aged care

The big ticket items in the five-year plan include $6.5 billion for an additional 80,000 home care packages over the coming two years, almost $800 million to support 1.6 million informal carers through respite and payments, $3.9 billion to increase the care residents of aged care homes receive to 200 minutes per day including 40 minutes with a registered nurse.

In a move that will likely shake up the industry, $102 million will be spent on placing residential aged care places in the hands of senior Australians instead of residential aged care homes. There is also $200 million for a star rating system to better inform senior Australians and their families.

The need to attract and train aged care workers has seen the Government commit $652 million into the aged care workforce and tougher governance of the industry has seen the government provide $698 million.

Sadly, Recommendation 25 from the Final Report, which was set to revolutionise aged care through a single assessment and funding programme incorporating all home care and residential aged care services, providing funding based on the individual’s needs with flexibility and choice across providers was accepted in principle only.

In their response, the Government said that a new home care programme “will be designed to better target services to eligible senior Australians” and that “Senior Australians will also have more control and flexibility to select a residential aged care provider of their choice”.

Not available to all

This indicates there will be improvements to how the system operates, the level of choice and transparency and the amount of services that will be available for senior Australians. But unlike Medicare or the NDIS, aged care will still be a rationed system.

It’s hard not to be excited about a $17.7 billion plan for aged care but my excitement is tempered by the knowledge that the system that will provide greater choice, transparency and care for many will still see some senior Australians miss out. In his opening remarks Treasurer Josh Frydenberg referred to “Team Australia”, it would be great if “Team Australia” adopted the motto to “leave no senior Australian behind”.


Rachel Lane is the Principal of Aged Care Gurus where she oversees a national network of adviser dedicated to providing quality advice on retirement living and aged care. She is also the co-author of a number of books with Noel Whittaker including the best-seller “Aged Care, Who Cares?” and their most recent book “Downsizing Made Simple”. To find an adviser or buy a book visit


Name withheld
May 27, 2021

I am 68 years old. I am in remission from pancreatic cancer and Hodgkin lymphoma. I have an investment property. I get $550 per week from that property. I am not eligible for disability pension or pension card. My medical bills are high. My wife is force to keep on working because there is not enough money to pay the household bills and maintain a reasonable lifestyle. She gets $75k gross per annum. She applied for carer's allowance. It was rejected. She is 62 years of age. I have to care for myself. It is tough at times. Please advise.

Graham Hand
May 28, 2021

Hi, if you would like Rachel to refer you to an aged care specialist adviser, please drop us a line and we will forward your request to her. Firstlinks is not licensed for personal advice.

Peter Bayley
May 27, 2021

A close reading of the government's announcements and response to the Royal Commission will reveal some 'smoke & mirrors'. A substantial slice of the $17B will go into bureaucracy (three new bureaucratic structures) and compliance. With 60% of residential aged care operators presently losing money the additional money will help but the extent of additional micromanagement complaince is mind boggling. Talented managers are leaving the industry as they are fed up with bureaucratic rules and rigid and aggressive accreditation assessments. Aged care is now regulated more than hospitals.

May 29, 2021

Agree, I work in the industry. The micromanagement and compliance is costing at least 30% of any funding put in to Home care packages. eg. Fund holding 15% ; care planning 15% ; mark up on service provision 50%


Leave a Comment:



Noel's share winners and loser plus budget reality check

What the RC, Budget and Keating mean for aged care

Why Budget infrastructure spending matters


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates


$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.


Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.