Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 608

$5.4 trillion wealth transfer poses deep questions on legacy

Australia is in the midst of a $5.4 trillion intergenerational wealth transfer, the largest in its history. Fuelled by decades of rising property prices and investment gains, this unprecedented shift is prompting many Australians to rethink the question of legacy: What do I truly want to leave behind?

As James Gruber explored in his 12 March editorial, this transfer has the potential to entrench inequality, concentrate privilege, and distort economic incentives – what he termed a “generational tragedy.” But the impact isn't only economic. When wealth arrives without context or purpose, it can disorient the next generation, dulling ambition, blurring identity, and eroding a sense of value. Warren Buffett’s widely quoted maxim captures a growing sentiment: “I want to give my kids just enough so that they feel they can do anything, but not so much that they feel they can do nothing.”

In response, Australians are turning to philanthropy. Not only to share wealth but to pass on values, engage their families meaningfully, and ensure their legacy enriches more than just their descendants. Structured giving vehicles offer a rare combination of emotional resonance and strategic advantage, enabling donors to model generosity across generations while accessing tax benefits, both during life and through their estate.

The new face of inheritance

Unlike previous generations, modern heirs are more likely to receive wealth at a time when they are less likely to need it. The average recipient is in their 50s, typically at or near peak earning years, and is often already established in regards to their career and property ownership. While the median inheritance across the population remains modest, the figures grow significantly in affluent households.

At the same time, financial dynamics within families have shifted. Adult children are increasingly supported earlier in life through home deposits, school fees for grandchildren, or gifts during their lifetime from the ‘Bank of Mum and Dad’. By the time a formal inheritance arrives, many recipients are already financially independent.

Figure 1: Gift recipients are younger than inheritance recipients

Source: The Productivity Commission’s Wealth Transfers and their Economic Effects report, December 2021.

If the kids are alright, what kind of legacy matters now?

A practical response: Giving structures

For families who want to pass on more than just money, philanthropy is a meaningful alternative. Structured giving through sub-funds (also known as giving funds) in Public Ancillary Funds or Private Ancillary Funds is gaining popularity as a way to model generosity, reduce tax, and involve future generations in purposeful giving.

Donations into these structures are fully tax-deductible in the year they are made or can be spread over up to five years. This has made them a popular tool for managing large tax events during life – such as business exits, asset sales, or bonuses – allowing donors to receive a larger tax deduction when they need it most, while retaining flexibility to thoughtfully distribute the funds to charities over time.

Chris Cuffe, Portfolio Manager and trustee Director of the Australian Philanthropic Services Foundation, notes that structured giving is increasingly common among pre-retirees looking to front-load their giving during their income earning years.

“Just as many people pre-fund their retirement through superannuation, structured giving allows you to pre-fund your giving, claim the tax deduction while you're earning, then support the causes you care about over time during your retirement alongside your children and grandchildren.”

Once established, the capital is irrevocably committed to the community. A minimum of 4% (for public ancillary funds) or 5% (for private ancillary funds) must be distributed to charity each year, while the remaining balance is invested for long-term growth. Investment returns are tax-free, enabling the fund’s giving capacity to grow and compound over time.

Structured giving can also play a strategic role in estate planning. Where an ancillary fund is already in existence at the time of death, assets bequeathed to it are eligible for capital gains tax rollover relief. This allows families to direct assets with significant unrealised gains into philanthropy, which maximises the impact of the gift while enabling a more tax-effective distribution of the estate.

More than money: A tool for connection

One of the most powerful aspects of structured giving is its ability to unify families around shared values. This alignment between purpose and planning is what makes philanthropy such a compelling legacy tool.

Parents are increasingly involving the next generations in conversations about charitable priorities, community needs, and family values.

For Simon and Susan Power, establishing a giving fund in the APS Foundation following a liquidity event opened a meaningful conversation with their children about wealth, responsibility, and impact. “It’s helped our kids understand the privilege we have and the responsibility that comes with it,” Simon says. “Giving has become part of our family’s story.”

From the outset, the fund was designed to be collaborative. “The key reason we set it up was to involve the kids in giving,” he explains. “They decide together who we support each year.” In the first year, their children chose a grassroots charity helping kids play local sport – something close to their hearts. “We went to a presentation where supported kids spoke. It was incredibly powerful,” Susan recalls.

Rather than a transactional handover of assets, philanthropy provides a platform for families to reflect on what they stand for. It is increasingly common to see a founder establish a giving fund during their lifetime, involve their children in decision-making, and use the fund as a long-term vessel for charitable capital – one that can continue well beyond their own lifetime.

“It’s become something we do together as a family,” Simon adds. “We talk about what matters to us, and decide where to give. It’s one of the most meaningful conversations we have.”

For some, this is about reimagining what they see as an outdated model of inheritance. For others, it’s about anchoring their wealth in purpose and passing on a legacy of generosity.

A quiet shift is underway

Australians are generous – more than 80% give in some form – but what is changing is the structure, scale, and sophistication of that giving. There are now more than 3,000 ancillary funds in Australia, managing billions in capital committed to the community. "Contributions to these vehicles in the last financial year (FY24) are anticipated to have reached a record high, building on the exponential growth in contributions over the past decade.

Structured philanthropy is moving from the margins to the mainstream of wealth and estate planning. It’s being embraced not only by ultra-high-net-worth individuals, but also by retirees with appreciated assets and professionals seeking to create lasting impact. While once considered the domain of the very wealthy, structured giving is now far more accessible, with meaningful benefits beginning to accrue from donations of around $40,000.

A legacy that lasts

The traditional model of inheritance is changing. For a growing number of Australians, legacy is no longer defined solely by the transfer of wealth but by the opportunity to pass on values, purpose, and a vision for the future. As we navigate the largest intergenerational wealth transfer in history, philanthropy is emerging not just as a way to give back, but as a way to look forward.

 

Rachael Rofe is Head of the APS Foundation, a Public Ancillary Fund offered by Australian Philanthropic Services.

 

7 Comments
Rob
April 25, 2025

Watch the costs. A Private Ancilliary Fund [PAF] can be relatively expensive to set up - circa $4500 in my case but in so many ways is like a retirement SMSF - has an investment strategy, 5% minimum distribution each year, reporting and accounting is not onerous unless you make it complicated. Once up and running, is dramatically cheaper than a Public Fund simply because there are no percentage based fees - again, same principle as a SMSF

If you have some large tax bills in the future, great idea. While you do not "avoid" the tax, your tax liability can go "into" the PAF and you decide how that "tax money" is spent on good causes, which has to be a much better idea than the dunderheads in Canberra spending your tax dollars!!

David
April 26, 2025

I agree Rob. I did have to weigh up the fee - especially if the balance grows but I also decided I wanted to support the infrastructure of APS and the public fund so up to a point it makes sense. It would be helpful if they (and the large superfunds for that matter) developed a sliding scale of fees and remove the incentive to set up private funds if you add to the balance.

Rachael
April 29, 2025

Great points. One thing I would add, though: unless you're managing the investments yourself, don’t forget to factor in the percentage-based fees charged by investment managers — that affects the cost comparison of a private ancillary fund vs giving fund in a public ancillary fund. That can make a bigger difference than people sometimes expect.

In my experience, PAFs generally start achieving meaningful economies of scale once the balance approaches ~$2M. Below that, a public ancillary fund often works out to be better value once you take reasonable expenses into account. And then there is the convenience consideration.

When looking at public ancillary fund providers, it's just worth checking that any investment returns are quoted net of all fees, that costs are transparent and all-inclusive, and that you’ve got flexibility to transfer (or port) your balance later if you ever want to move.

You're definitely spot on — structured giving is a brilliant way to put your wealth to meaningful use for the causes you care about (and not leave it to the dunderheads in Canberra!).

David
April 24, 2025

Great article Rachael and thank you Chris for your work at the beginning and ongoing interaction with the investment portfolio - the returns have sustained and grown our ability to support worthy beneficiaries.

As a client of APS for over 10 years I'd also like to recommend them if you are in the position to begin this journey. Initially we had a private fund and found the administration difficult so transferred to the public fund as a sub fund and the online giving process and communication is very easy.

Discussions with family can be fun too - our first sit down with our kids gave us quite a laugh when we explained we wanted to give away a substantial (for us) sum of money. Their responses -

Kid 1. Can we still go on holidays occasionally?
Kid 2. Can we still get takeaway sometimes?
Kid 3. Use your powers for good Mum and Dad!

They were young then and now they suggest potential beneficiaries each year as their awareness grows.

We didn't do it for legacy reasons although I do understand how important that concept can be. We think we are just stewards of these resources for a while and as the article says - you can choose to steward those resources more broadly than your immediate circle if that appeals to you.

Chris Cuffe
April 24, 2025

I’ve been thinking about legacy for a long time — not just in terms of dollars, but in terms of what really lasts.

When I founded Australian Philanthropic Services, it was because I saw a gap — Australians wanted to give, but the structures to do it well weren’t easy to access. Today, I manage the investment portfolio for the APS Foundation, and I can tell you: the most meaningful legacies we see aren’t just financial.

Philanthropy gives families a way to come together, talk about what matters, and pass on more than just wealth. It’s not always an easy conversation — but it’s one of the most important ones.

Great piece, Rachael

Rob
April 27, 2025

Chris, as you well know the Finance Industry has a built in "disconnect" - the "size" of the fund be it Superannuation or Philanthropy has almost nothing to do with the admin costs of running that fund. I confess to being "poacher turned gamekeeper" but when percentage based fees are levied for essentially " fixed $ admin costs", the model is wrong and it needs to be challenged

Chris Cuffe
April 29, 2025

Thanks for your comment. You raise a really important point.

Australian Philanthropic Services is a charity that I founded out of frustration with the complexity and cost traditionally involved in setting up and administering ancillary funds. Thanks to the support of a group of committed philanthropists, we were able to build a break-even model that has helped drive establishment and administration costs across the sector down significantly - from tens of thousands of dollars to around $4,000 for a PAF, and zero for a giving fund.



As a charity, our percentage-based fee model isn't about enriching anyone. APS Foundation operates on a break-even basis. Every dollar of our fee goes directly toward covering the real, ongoing costs of running our service and delivering a high standard of service, governance, investment oversight, compliance, and reporting for donors.

Our fee is very modest compared to the level of support, structure, and stewardship we provide - and certainly much lower than many comparable offerings. That said, as we grow and achieve greater economies of scale, we’re hopeful that we’ll one day be able to reduce fees further.

We completely agree that transparency and fairness should sit at the heart of philanthropy - and that’s exactly what we set out to do as a not-for-profit provider.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Will young Australians be better off than their parents?

Why the $5.4 trillion wealth transfer is a generational tragedy

Preserving wealth through generations is hard

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Raising the GST to 15%

Treasurer Jim Chalmers aims to tackle tax reform but faces challenges. Previous reviews struggled due to political sensitivities, highlighting the need for comprehensive and politically feasible change.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Trump's US dollar assault is fuelling CBA's rise

Australian-based investors have been perplexed by the steep rise in CBA's share price But it's becoming clear that US funds are buying into our largest bank as a hedge against potential QE and further falls in the US dollar.

Investment strategies

With markets near record highs, here's what you should do with your portfolio

Markets have weathered geopolitical turmoil, hitting near record highs. Investors face tough decisions on valuations, asset concentration, and strategic portfolio rebalancing for risk control and future returns.

Property

Soaring house prices may be locking people into marriages

Soaring house prices are deepening Australia's cost of living crisis - and possibly distorting marriage decisions. New research links unexpected price changes to whether couples separate or silently struggle together.

Investment strategies

Google is facing 'the innovator's dilemma'

Artificial intelligence is forcing Google to rethink search - and its future. As usage shifts and rivals close in, will it adapt in time, or become a cautionary tale of disrupted disruptors?

Investment strategies

Study supports what many suspected about passive investing

The surge in passive investing doesn’t just mirror the market—it shapes it, often amplifying the rise of the largest firms and creating new risks and opportunities. For investors, understanding these effects is essential.

Property

Should we dump stamp duties for land taxes?

Economists have long flagged the idea of swapping property taxes for land taxes for fairness and equity reasons. This looks at why what seems fairer may not deliver the outcomes that we expect.

Investing

Being human means being a bad investor

Many of the behaviours that have made humans such a successful species also make it difficult for us to be good, long-term investors. The key to better decision making is to understand what makes us human and adapt.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.