Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 386

'Quality' ETFs under the microscope

Co-Author | Kongkon Gogoi

Factor investing is an investment approach that involves focusing on certain drivers of returns across asset classes. Globally, it has made inroads into retail and institutional investors’ portfolios alike, as a tool to enhance risk-adjusted performance in a relatively low-cost manner. The trend is alive and well in Australia.

Interest in the quality factor has been a recurring theme among the more popular factor ETFs, helped along by some attractive returns.

What is quality?

The quality factor is characterised by stable earnings, robust financial positions measured by leverage, and higher profit margins. However, strategies can interpret and apply the quality factor in different ways. The index provider upon which the ETF is based can define quality in its own way depending on the source of company data and the emphasis placed on each data point. And ultimately portfolio construction methods can vary.

A lack of consensus on a comprehensive quality factor-focused index means that two strategies targeting the same quality factor can derive materially different portfolio attributes. For example, when comparing the VanEck Vectors MSCI Wld ex Aus Qlty ETF (ASX:QUAL) with the BetaShares Global Quality Leaders ETF (ASX:QLTY), the former has a significant size tilt toward giant-cap companies (61.5% vs 40.0% in the latter). For Australian investors, quality ETFs offer greater sectoral diversification - they typically have higher allocations to technology and healthcare names, and lower allocation to financials and materials.

Market cap | QUAL v QLTY

Source: Morningstar

Quality factor ETFs in Australia

For investors wanting to incorporate quality factors via an ETF as part of their equity portfolio, there are two types of investment avenues:

  1. Pure-play quality factor strategies
  2. Multifactor ETFs

The latter incorporates quality as one of the underlying factors in their portfolio construction. The two approaches can deliver noticeably different portfolio traits.

Morningstar’s Factor Profile can be a useful guide for investors in assessing factor-based equity strategies, displaying a strategy’s standing across seven investment attributes compared with its category peers and index, and thus helping to understand how different strategies can augment and complement their existing portfolios. Within the Morningstar Factor Profile framework, the Quality attribute is defined as a measure of profitability and leverage. We can see factor profiles of SPDR MSCI World Quality Mix (ASX:QMIX) (multifactor) and VanEck Vectors MSCI Wld ex Aus Qlty ETF (ASX:QUAL) (pure quality factor) in the Morningstar Factor Profile below.

Factor profiles of a multifactor ETF vs quality ETF

Source: Morningstar Premium

Defining quality

The Quality factor cohort is a small but heterogeneous group, and consequently the return profiles can be markedly different. The idiosyncratic return profiles are attributed to small yet critical divergences in certain portfolio traits that manifest based on the approach taken to define quality in constructing the portfolio.

To illustrate this point, VanEck Vectors MSCI Wld ex Aus Qlty ETF (ASX:QUAL) and BetaShares Global Quality Leaders ETF (ASX:QLTY) both offer investors the quality factor exposure to global equities, but their distinct approaches can lead to nuanced contrast in the other factor exposures. For their current portfolios this is particularly the case across the size, yield, and growth factors. Other differences can be seen when compared with MSCI World ex Australia Index and the Morningstar category average.

Furthermore, impacting the long-term performance is the sector exposures disparity. VanEck Vectors MSCI Wld ex Aus Qlty ETF (ASX:QUAL) allocation to consumer staples is almost twice of the Morningstar category average whereas healthcare is twice of the category average in BetaShares Global Quality Leaders ETF (ASX:QLTY).

Sector exposure | QUAL v QLTY

Source: Morningstar, AUD, as of Oct 31, 2020

Flows and outperformance

Based on net cash flow, investor interest in all factor ETFs in Australia has been subtle. However, assets in quality ETFs have grown markedly over the past three years, likely in part driven by strong performance. VanEck Vectors MSCI Wld ex Aus Qlty ETF (ASX:QUAL) dwarfs the similar factor funds and has the longest track record in which investors can take confidence.

In the domestic space, a pure-play Australian equity quality product is not yet available, so investors may look to a quality factor ETF via the multifactor approach offered by iShares Edge MSCI Australia Multifactor ETF (ASX:AUMF). Other highly niche products available are region-specific, such as China exposure with VanEck Vectors China New Economy ETF (ASX:CNEW) (Multifactor) and India exposure with Betashares India Quality ETF (ASX:IIND) (Quality).

Quality ETF market growth by fund, 5 Yr, fund size (comprehensive, monthly, AUD)

Source: Morningstar

Quality has been a clear winner in recent years, delivering impressive peer-relative performance across all three periods used for assessment. Specifically, the group's downside capture ratio during the first-quarter 2020 sell-off and upside capture ratio during the third-quarter 2020 recovery has been impressive.

Quality-based strategies have more than demonstrated their efficacy in withstanding the turbulent market conditions if recent times are anything to go by. However, investors should remember that all factors will have phases when they work and when they don’t, and a balance across a range of factors will ensure healthy portfolio diversification.

Quality ETFs snapshot

Source: Morningstar

 

Zunjar Sanzgiri and Kongkon Gogoi are Senior Manager Research Analysts for Morningstar. Additional reporting from Emma Rapaport, Editorial Manager, Morningstar Australia.


Try Morningstar Premium for free


 

RELATED ARTICLES

Retail investors can invest like institutions

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

24 hot stocks and funds for 2021

Many investors use the new year to review their portfolios, and in this free ebook, two dozen fund managers and product providers give their best ideas for 2021 - some stocks, some funds, some sectors.

Great new ways the Government helps retirees

Last year's retiree checklist of services available was one of our most popular articles. There are some additions for 2021, and while it can take effort to set them up, they can pay off over the long term.

The hazards of asset allocation in a late-stage major bubble

The Grantham article everyone is quoting, in full. "The long, long bull market since 2009 has finally matured into a fully-fledged epic bubble ... this could very well be the most important event of your investing lives."

Four simple strategies deliver long-term investing comfort

A long-time advocate of the merits of generating income by investing in industrial companies rather than bonds or deposits checks his 'mothership' chart for the latest results, and continues to feel vindicated.

Cut it out ... millionaires are not wealthy

The widespread use of 'millionaire' must stop. Inflation means that the basket of goods and services that cost $1 million in 1960 now requires $15 million. Today, millionaires are not wealthy.

Retirement changes everything: a post-retirement investing framework

Categorising post-retirement needs – living, lifestyle, legacy and contingency – creates a framework for retirees. Advisers can translate these needs into investment goals and portfolios.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Unfortunately, all fund manager presentations are good

Part of the fund manager's job is to raise money from investors, and with years of practice, a few good stock stories and an educated guess on the future, it's not hard to present well. That's a problem for investors.

Latest from Morningstar

Win some, lose some: Buffett's 2020 scorecard

Warren Buffett's investment portfolio gains attention because of his legendary status, but parts of his empire in insurance, railways, metalworking and aircraft suppliers have been damaged by the pandemic.

Shares

Prefer or defer? Sector and investment themes for 2021

It's time for equity prices to more closely tie to a company’s underlying near-term earnings trajectory and financial strength. Despite the market trading at record levels, some stocks have been left behind.

Retirement

Is cancelling the SG increase a retiree version of ‘Buy now, pay later’?

No doubt, any reduction or deferral in the SG increase would be received favourably by many. However, early access and lower contributions undermine the foundation of our super system.

Three ways to match housing affordability with good returns

This increased focus on affordable housing is welcome but the challenge is that investors typically require ‘market’ rate financial returns. By definition, social housing tenants cannot pay market rent.

Investment strategies

Investors face their own Breaking Bad moment

Savers are making small decision after small decision that leads them away from investing and closer to outright speculating. Time will tell if this ends in a bloody climax or we all live happily ever after.

Shares

Australian banks prove resilient but risks remain

Australian major banks reported a decline in financial performance in 2020 but as the impact of the pandemic evolves, the banks maintained a strong focus on customers. Is the renewed market optimism justified?

  • KPMG
  • 1 January 2020

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use.
Any general advice or class service prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, has been prepared by without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.