Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 264

10 steps to protect your SMSF from loss of mental capacity

If you have an SMSF, you need to plan ahead to ensure that it can keep going if you lose mental capacity due to dementia or other reasons such as suffering a stroke. Otherwise, the fund’s assets and operations could be frozen. This may result in losses from being unable to buy or sell investments at the right time, control of the fund falling into the wrong hands (including total strangers), and even the loss of complying fund status with catastrophic tax consequences.

Before the unthinkable happens, here are 10 ways to protect your SMSF from your incapacity:

1. Talk to your financial adviser about what you want with your fund if you lose mental capacity. This should include:

  • Who should be in control
  • What should happen to the investment strategy and ongoing management of the fund
  • Whether the fund should be wound up and your member benefits rolled into an APRA fund
  • What should happen to your death benefits, and so forth.

Your adviser should counsel you and co-ordinate further assistance from an accountant or a lawyer where necessary.

2. Put into place a corporate trustee rather than individual trustees. This is easier as there will be no need to change the ownership of the fund assets (which can be a costly and time-consuming exercise) as they will be in the name of the corporate trustee, and all that needs to happen is that you will be replaced as a director.

Enduring Power of Attorney

3. Put into place an Enduring Power of Attorney to appoint someone who you trust to handle your financial affairs and to be appointed in your place as a director of the corporate trustee (or a trustee of the fund if you are not using a company as trustee) if the need arises.

4. Check the SMSF’s trust deed to ensure it allows an Enduring Attorney to be appointed in your place as a trustee of the fund or as a director of the corporate trustee. If it doesn’t, then have it updated accordingly.

5. Provide written instructions to your Enduring Attorney and the other trustees or directors of the corporate trustee. Let them know that you want your Enduring Attorney to be appointed in your place. Advise their roles and responsibilities and specific instructions regarding issues such as dealing with particular fund investments.

6. Appoint one or more substitute or ‘back up’ Enduring Attorneys, especially if you appoint your spouse as first choice, as they may be the same age as you and therefore at risk of developing dementia at the same time as you do. In this case, the substitute attorneys should be younger than you (such as one or more of your trusted children).

Investment and governance strategy

7. The investment strategy should set out what should happen both before and after a member loses capacity, and ensure that the strategy binds all the fund trustees.

8. If you are a director and shareholder in a corporate trustee of the fund, check the constitution of the company to make sure that your Enduring Attorney can exercise the voting power on your shares so that they can be appointed as director in your place.

9. Put into place a Non-lapsing Binding Death Benefit Nomination (and if necessary update the trust deed for your SMSF to allow you to do this). Otherwise, if you lose capacity and your nomination lapses, you will not be able to renew it and the trustee of the fund will have the discretion to pay your death benefit, perhaps to someone you did not intend as a receiver.

10. Make sure your will is properly updated, because once you lose capacity, you can no longer make or change your will. This can be critical in the context of your SMSF, as the only way you can give your super to persons who are not eligible to receive benefits directly from your SMSF is via your will. For instance, unless you were in an interdependency relationship with them or they were your financial dependants, you cannot nominate grandchildren to receive a death benefit directly from your fund. Instead, you have to direct the death benefit to your deceased estate and then make a gift of the death benefit to your grandchildren under your will.

 

Brian Hor is Special Counsel, Superannuation & Estate Planning at SUPERCentral. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

The ATO provides guidelines on winding up an SMSF, and it's more complicated than most people expect.

 

  •   26 July 2018
  • 3
  •      
  •   
3 Comments
David Owen
July 29, 2018

You forgot to add an 11th option and that is to close the SMSF BEFORE you lose mental capacity. I am sure there are many people still in their SMSF because their adviser, be it their accountant or financial adviser, keeps telling them that it is the best option.

I doubt that assertion is correct for any people. We have had our SMSF for 38 years and are in the process of closing it before we are in a situation where it will become harder and harder to make decisions. David O.

Brian Hor
July 30, 2018

Thanks very much David for your comment. One reason why I did not mention the winding up option is that many people need to maintain their SMSF for estate planning reasons, especially the fact that you can make a very tailored non-lapsing binding death benefit nomination for your death benefits under an appropriate SMSF trust deed, which is currently impossible in a retail fund. E.g. if you want to pay a lifetime super pension to a surviving second spouse, and make sure that on their death (or earlier re-marriage) that the super goes back to your children of a previous relationship. This may be something that a person wants to achieve, and ensure it still happens in the event that they have lost mental capacity.

David Owen
July 31, 2018

Thanks for your clarification and I do appreciate the potential benefit. However, the argument for retaining the SMSF requires many conditions to be met. Here are a few:

You would have to ensure that a cascading non-lapsing binding death benefit nomination was in place.
You would have to ensure the trust deed allowed for the cascading nomination.
You would need to have the correct authorities in place; e.g. it is my understanding the a personal Enduring Power of Authority does not authorise the grantee to take on the grantor's role as being director of a company (the corporate trustee). You would need a corporate PoA.
The true deed would have to allow for an attorney to act on behalf of the member.
You would need to ensure that those to whom you granted the power understood the significant of the BDBN. It would be so easy for them to inadvertently close the SMSF in the future and roll over the benefit(s) to off the shelf super amounts so as to simplify their lives. I have seen this happen where a benefit was rolled over from one off the shelf fund to another thereby eliminating the effect of the non-lapsing BDBN that was in place.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Every SMSF trustee should have an Enduring Power of Attorney

SMSF estate planning: Eight things to consider

10 things I learned about dementia and care homes from close range

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

What if Australia’s golden age of dividends is ending? Rather than overhaul your portfolio, it may be worth considering where new capital can work harder. I discuss four income strategies and the trade-offs behind each.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The ageing ‘crisis’ has not and will not happen

Rising age dependency is frequently treated as a warning sign for economies. But when actual workforce participation is examined, a strikingly different picture emerges about ageing, productivity and economic sustainability.

Retirement

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Shares

Four charts that expose market concentration risk

Investors have recently been rewarded for backing market leaders, but history suggests this eventually comes at a cost. Now may be the time to review whether your portfolio is carrying unintended risks beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The case for gearing beyond property

Most Australians gear into property but ignore shares. That may be a mistake. Used carefully, geared equity strategies can enhance long-term returns, reduce cash tied up in growth assets and support retirement income goals.

Economy

Australia's $1 trillion debt pile

The headlines exclaiming that Australian government debt has hit A$1 trillion and US government debt has hit $40 trillion has turned heads, but how serious are they really? Will Australia's mix of debt create challenges?

Economy

Has 100 years of growth made us any happier?

For decades, GDP has been the benchmark for economic success, but has it made us materially happier? If happiness does not rise in lockstep with prosperity, are we overlooking what constitutes a successful society?

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.