Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 264

10 steps to protect your SMSF from loss of mental capacity

If you have an SMSF, you need to plan ahead to ensure that it can keep going if you lose mental capacity due to dementia or other reasons such as suffering a stroke. Otherwise, the fund’s assets and operations could be frozen. This may result in losses from being unable to buy or sell investments at the right time, control of the fund falling into the wrong hands (including total strangers), and even the loss of complying fund status with catastrophic tax consequences.

Before the unthinkable happens, here are 10 ways to protect your SMSF from your incapacity:

1. Talk to your financial adviser about what you want with your fund if you lose mental capacity. This should include:

  • Who should be in control
  • What should happen to the investment strategy and ongoing management of the fund
  • Whether the fund should be wound up and your member benefits rolled into an APRA fund
  • What should happen to your death benefits, and so forth.

Your adviser should counsel you and co-ordinate further assistance from an accountant or a lawyer where necessary.

2. Put into place a corporate trustee rather than individual trustees. This is easier as there will be no need to change the ownership of the fund assets (which can be a costly and time-consuming exercise) as they will be in the name of the corporate trustee, and all that needs to happen is that you will be replaced as a director.

Enduring Power of Attorney

3. Put into place an Enduring Power of Attorney to appoint someone who you trust to handle your financial affairs and to be appointed in your place as a director of the corporate trustee (or a trustee of the fund if you are not using a company as trustee) if the need arises.

4. Check the SMSF’s trust deed to ensure it allows an Enduring Attorney to be appointed in your place as a trustee of the fund or as a director of the corporate trustee. If it doesn’t, then have it updated accordingly.

5. Provide written instructions to your Enduring Attorney and the other trustees or directors of the corporate trustee. Let them know that you want your Enduring Attorney to be appointed in your place. Advise their roles and responsibilities and specific instructions regarding issues such as dealing with particular fund investments.

6. Appoint one or more substitute or ‘back up’ Enduring Attorneys, especially if you appoint your spouse as first choice, as they may be the same age as you and therefore at risk of developing dementia at the same time as you do. In this case, the substitute attorneys should be younger than you (such as one or more of your trusted children).

Investment and governance strategy

7. The investment strategy should set out what should happen both before and after a member loses capacity, and ensure that the strategy binds all the fund trustees.

8. If you are a director and shareholder in a corporate trustee of the fund, check the constitution of the company to make sure that your Enduring Attorney can exercise the voting power on your shares so that they can be appointed as director in your place.

9. Put into place a Non-lapsing Binding Death Benefit Nomination (and if necessary update the trust deed for your SMSF to allow you to do this). Otherwise, if you lose capacity and your nomination lapses, you will not be able to renew it and the trustee of the fund will have the discretion to pay your death benefit, perhaps to someone you did not intend as a receiver.

10. Make sure your will is properly updated, because once you lose capacity, you can no longer make or change your will. This can be critical in the context of your SMSF, as the only way you can give your super to persons who are not eligible to receive benefits directly from your SMSF is via your will. For instance, unless you were in an interdependency relationship with them or they were your financial dependants, you cannot nominate grandchildren to receive a death benefit directly from your fund. Instead, you have to direct the death benefit to your deceased estate and then make a gift of the death benefit to your grandchildren under your will.

 

Brian Hor is Special Counsel, Superannuation & Estate Planning at SUPERCentral. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

The ATO provides guidelines on winding up an SMSF, and it's more complicated than most people expect.

 

  •   26 July 2018
  • 3
  •      
  •   
3 Comments
David Owen
July 29, 2018

You forgot to add an 11th option and that is to close the SMSF BEFORE you lose mental capacity. I am sure there are many people still in their SMSF because their adviser, be it their accountant or financial adviser, keeps telling them that it is the best option.

I doubt that assertion is correct for any people. We have had our SMSF for 38 years and are in the process of closing it before we are in a situation where it will become harder and harder to make decisions. David O.

Brian Hor
July 30, 2018

Thanks very much David for your comment. One reason why I did not mention the winding up option is that many people need to maintain their SMSF for estate planning reasons, especially the fact that you can make a very tailored non-lapsing binding death benefit nomination for your death benefits under an appropriate SMSF trust deed, which is currently impossible in a retail fund. E.g. if you want to pay a lifetime super pension to a surviving second spouse, and make sure that on their death (or earlier re-marriage) that the super goes back to your children of a previous relationship. This may be something that a person wants to achieve, and ensure it still happens in the event that they have lost mental capacity.

David Owen
July 31, 2018

Thanks for your clarification and I do appreciate the potential benefit. However, the argument for retaining the SMSF requires many conditions to be met. Here are a few:

You would have to ensure that a cascading non-lapsing binding death benefit nomination was in place.
You would have to ensure the trust deed allowed for the cascading nomination.
You would need to have the correct authorities in place; e.g. it is my understanding the a personal Enduring Power of Authority does not authorise the grantee to take on the grantor's role as being director of a company (the corporate trustee). You would need a corporate PoA.
The true deed would have to allow for an attorney to act on behalf of the member.
You would need to ensure that those to whom you granted the power understood the significant of the BDBN. It would be so easy for them to inadvertently close the SMSF in the future and roll over the benefit(s) to off the shelf super amounts so as to simplify their lives. I have seen this happen where a benefit was rolled over from one off the shelf fund to another thereby eliminating the effect of the non-lapsing BDBN that was in place.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Every SMSF trustee should have an Enduring Power of Attorney

Can Berkshire thrive without Buffett?

SMSF estate planning: Eight things to consider

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

Division 296: the initial moves to make before the windows close

What if the best superannuation strategy isn't about earning more, but acting before your options disappear? Several overlooked planning windows are narrowing, with consequences that can last for decades.

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Superannuation’s structural failings

Politicians are fighting over access to super, but they may be arguing about the wrong thing. The system’s three fundamental flaws have been hiding in plain sight for decades, costing Australians far more than they realise.

Planning

The great wealth transfer myth

Why do some families preserve wealth for generations while others struggle to? As the great wealth transfer unfolds, the determining factor is often not the structure of the estate, but the preparation of those who will inherit it.

Investment strategies

What comes after bank hybrids?

For years, bank hybrids have been a cornerstone of portfolio income. With tens of billions of dollars now disappearing from the market, investors face a critical question: what comes next, and are the obvious replacements enough?

Investment insights from the US

What happens when knowledge becomes a commodity? The latest themes emerging from the US tech sector suggest AI could reshape company moats, disrupt incumbents and create winners and losers in unexpected places.

Investing

Can Berkshire thrive without Buffett?

Warren Buffett's departure marks the end of an era. But the more important question for investors is whether Berkshire's culture, discipline and capital allocation framework can survive without the man who built them.

Retirement

The Bengen 4% Rule: Lost in translation

For years, retirees have been told to focus on withdrawal rates. But the real question is far simpler: how many dollars can you safely spend? The answer may be very different from what conventional retirement wisdom suggests.

Interest rates

Super low interest rates came with side effects

For more than a decade, investors lived through an era of near-zero interest rates. With bond yields now surging, it's worth asking whether cheap money solved economic problems, or introduced a much larger set of risks.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.