Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 453

Age pension is increasing: what you need to know

Australia’s age pension rose in March reflecting rising inflation and the growing cost of living pressures. This represents a pay rise of just over 2% and is the biggest increase in the payment in almost a decade.

Single pensioners will be $20.10 better off per fortnight, and couples up to $30.20 per fortnight (where both members of the couple are eligible).

Indexation also means that some people who were previously ineligible for a pension may become eligible as the cut-off amounts of assets and income are also increased.

But older Australians receiving aged care need to know that an increase in the pension also means an increase in their Basic Daily Fee. This means they’ll only see $4 of the $20 pension increase.

In this article, we’ll walk through the changes step by step and what they mean for you.


The maximum rate of age pension payment for singles increased by $20.10 per fortnight from $967.50 to $987.60. The maximum rate for couples increased by $15.10 each from $729.30 per fortnight for each eligible member to $744.40.

A couple where both members are eligible to receive the maximum payment can receive $1,488.80 per fortnight or $38,708.80 per year combined.

Source: Services Australia

The assets and income level before pensions are disqualified under the means tests have also increased.


For homeowners who are single, the asset test cut-off increased from $593,000 to $599,750. For couples it increased from $891,500 to $901,500.

For couples who are separated by illness, as is the case when one or both move into aged care, the cut-off increased from $1,050,000 to $1,063,500.

*It’s important to remember that the value of your home is not included in these assets.


For singles, the amount of income you can earn before the age pension ceases has increased from $2,115 per fortnight to $2,155.20. For couples, the cut-off has increased from $3,237.20 per fortnight to $3,297.60.

*It’s important to remember that income earned under the work bonus (up to $7,800 per year) is not included. Income from investments is based on deemed income, rather than the actual income earned.

In announcing the changes Minister Anne Ruston said, “This is putting money in the pockets of all Australians who rely on our social security system and, in particular, older Australians.

But older Australians receiving aged care, whether that’s a Home Care Package or residential aged care, need to know that an increase in the pension also means an increase in their Basic Daily Fee.

The Basic Daily Fee you pay towards your cost of aged care is set based on a percentage of the Age Pension. In a Home Care Package, the maximum Basic Daily Fee is set at 17.5% of the basic Age Pension (and applies to people on a Level 4 Package) it was $11.02 per day and has increased to $11.26 per day from 20 March.

In a Home Care Package, the Basic Daily Fee is based on the level of your package:

  • Level 1 was $9.88 per day increasing to $10.08
  • Level 2 was $10.44 per day increasing to $10.66
  • Level 3 was $10.74 per day increasing to $10.97
  • Level 4 was $11.02 per day increasing to $11.26

So, if the fortnightly pension increases by $20.10, up to $3.36 will be needed to meet the increased cost of a home care package.

In residential aged care, the Basic Daily Fee is set at 85% of the basic Age Pension, it was $53.56 per day, increasing to $54.69.

This means that the Basic Daily Fee increase is $15.82 a fortnight, so of the extra $20.10 in Age pension, people living in aged care will only have $4.28 per fortnight to cover increases in their cost of living.

While the Basic Daily Fee does cover some of the cost of living in aged care such as meals, utilities and insurances, many aged care residents need to pay extra or additional service fees to cover alcohol, food, entertainment, and personal services. Personal expenses such as clothing, medications, health care, other insurances, transport, and communication costs remain the responsibility of the resident.

A $4 per fortnight increase in the Age Pension for people living in aged care is definitely a pay cut, not a pay rise.


Rachel Lane is the Principal of Aged Care Gurus where she oversees a national network of adviser dedicated to providing quality advice on retirement living and aged care. She is also the co-author of a number of books with Noel Whittaker including the best-seller 'Aged Care, Who Cares?' and their most recent book 'Downsizing Made Simple'. To find an adviser or buy a book visit



We need hard conversations about frailty planning

Do you really need to sell your home to fund aged care?

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners


Most viewed in recent weeks

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Comparing generations and the nine dimensions of our well-being

Using the nine dimensions of well-being used by the OECD, and dividing Australians into Baby Boomers, Generation Xers or Millennials, it is surprisingly easy to identify the winners and losers for most dimensions.

Anton in 2006 v 2022, it's deja vu (all over again)

What was bothering markets in 2006? Try the end of cheap money, bond yields rising, high energy prices and record high commodity prices feeding inflation. Who says these are 'unprecedented' times? It's 2006 v 2022.

Latest Updates


Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Survey: share your retirement experiences

All Baby Boomers are now over 55 and many are either in retirement or thinking about a transition from work. But what is retirement like? Is it the golden years or a drag? Do you have tips for making the most of it?


Time for value as ‘promise generators’ fail to deliver

A $28 billion global manager still sees far more potential in value than growth stocks, believes energy stocks are undervalued including an Australian company, and describes the need for resilience in investing.


Paul Keating's long-term plans for super and imputation

Paul Keating not only designed compulsory superannuation but in the 30 years since its introduction, he has maintained the rage. Here are highlights of three articles on SG's origins and two more recent interviews.

Fixed interest

On interest rates and credit, do you feel the need for speed?

Central bank support for credit and equity markets is reversing, which has led to wider spreads and higher rates. But what does that mean and is it time to jump at higher rates or do they have some way to go?

Investment strategies

Death notices for the 60/40 portfolio are premature

Pundits have once again declared the death of the 60% stock/40% bond portfolio amid sharp declines in both stock and bond prices. Based on history, balanced portfolios are apt to prove the naysayers wrong, again.

Exchange traded products

ETFs and the eight biggest worries in index investing

Both passive investing and ETFs have withstood criticism as their popularity has grown. They have been blamed for causing bubbles, distorting the market, and concentrating share ownership. Are any of these criticisms valid?



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.