Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 453

Age pension is increasing: what you need to know

Australia’s age pension rose in March reflecting rising inflation and the growing cost of living pressures. This represents a pay rise of just over 2% and is the biggest increase in the payment in almost a decade.

Single pensioners will be $20.10 better off per fortnight, and couples up to $30.20 per fortnight (where both members of the couple are eligible).

Indexation also means that some people who were previously ineligible for a pension may become eligible as the cut-off amounts of assets and income are also increased.

But older Australians receiving aged care need to know that an increase in the pension also means an increase in their Basic Daily Fee. This means they’ll only see $4 of the $20 pension increase.

In this article, we’ll walk through the changes step by step and what they mean for you.

Payments

The maximum rate of age pension payment for singles increased by $20.10 per fortnight from $967.50 to $987.60. The maximum rate for couples increased by $15.10 each from $729.30 per fortnight for each eligible member to $744.40.

A couple where both members are eligible to receive the maximum payment can receive $1,488.80 per fortnight or $38,708.80 per year combined.

Source: Services Australia

The assets and income level before pensions are disqualified under the means tests have also increased.

Assets

For homeowners who are single, the asset test cut-off increased from $593,000 to $599,750. For couples it increased from $891,500 to $901,500.

For couples who are separated by illness, as is the case when one or both move into aged care, the cut-off increased from $1,050,000 to $1,063,500.

*It’s important to remember that the value of your home is not included in these assets.

Income

For singles, the amount of income you can earn before the age pension ceases has increased from $2,115 per fortnight to $2,155.20. For couples, the cut-off has increased from $3,237.20 per fortnight to $3,297.60.

*It’s important to remember that income earned under the work bonus (up to $7,800 per year) is not included. Income from investments is based on deemed income, rather than the actual income earned.

In announcing the changes Minister Anne Ruston said, “This is putting money in the pockets of all Australians who rely on our social security system and, in particular, older Australians.

But older Australians receiving aged care, whether that’s a Home Care Package or residential aged care, need to know that an increase in the pension also means an increase in their Basic Daily Fee.

The Basic Daily Fee you pay towards your cost of aged care is set based on a percentage of the Age Pension. In a Home Care Package, the maximum Basic Daily Fee is set at 17.5% of the basic Age Pension (and applies to people on a Level 4 Package) it was $11.02 per day and has increased to $11.26 per day from 20 March.

In a Home Care Package, the Basic Daily Fee is based on the level of your package:

  • Level 1 was $9.88 per day increasing to $10.08
  • Level 2 was $10.44 per day increasing to $10.66
  • Level 3 was $10.74 per day increasing to $10.97
  • Level 4 was $11.02 per day increasing to $11.26

So, if the fortnightly pension increases by $20.10, up to $3.36 will be needed to meet the increased cost of a home care package.

In residential aged care, the Basic Daily Fee is set at 85% of the basic Age Pension, it was $53.56 per day, increasing to $54.69.

This means that the Basic Daily Fee increase is $15.82 a fortnight, so of the extra $20.10 in Age pension, people living in aged care will only have $4.28 per fortnight to cover increases in their cost of living.

While the Basic Daily Fee does cover some of the cost of living in aged care such as meals, utilities and insurances, many aged care residents need to pay extra or additional service fees to cover alcohol, food, entertainment, and personal services. Personal expenses such as clothing, medications, health care, other insurances, transport, and communication costs remain the responsibility of the resident.

A $4 per fortnight increase in the Age Pension for people living in aged care is definitely a pay cut, not a pay rise.

 

Rachel Lane is the Principal of Aged Care Gurus where she oversees a national network of adviser dedicated to providing quality advice on retirement living and aged care. She is also the co-author of a number of books with Noel Whittaker including the best-seller 'Aged Care, Who Cares?' and their most recent book 'Downsizing Made Simple'. To find an adviser or buy a book visit www.agedcaregurus.com.au.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

12 tips for ‘aged care season’

Biggest change in the Aged Care Interest Rate since the GFC

Recent age pension changes impact non pensioners too

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.