Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 416

Among key trends in Australian banks, one factor stands out

Australia’s major banks make up a large chunk of the ASX and are a key component of most investors’ portfolios. Following the Big Four reporting half-yearly or quarterly results, it is an opportune time to reflect on the sector and some of the key trends.

Main takeaways from the Big Four banks’ results

Bad debts were less of a factor than we expected on the back of a positive economic outlook thanks to the amount of money that’s been thrown at the economy by the central bank and the Federal Government. The large chunk of loans that went into deferral have now rolled off deferral and borrowers are back into the habit of paying down their debt. About 10% of mortgage holders were not paying anything, not paying down the debt or paying their mortgage for about four to six months.

From an asset quality perspective, the market was expecting a good outcome and it came through better than expected. On the operational part, the market seems to be shifting back to analysing the top line on revenues and credit growth, which is not growing as quickly as analysts thought. On a net basis we are still seeing anaemic credit growth from households and while business lending has shown some signs of improvement, we still need to see how that flows through over the next three to six months.

Those are the broad trends. Some banks are spending smartly because they know how to and some banks are hoping that they are on the right track to reach a sustainable level in the next three to five years.

Resilience of the banking sector

The COVID pandemic and associated business disruption was a massive stress test of the Australian banking system. Thankfully, the Australian banks were already in decent shape going into COVID-19. Regulators in both Australia and New Zealand were proactive from the start and have been conservative, relative to global peers, in the way they calculate capital.

Commentators may argue that the major banks benefitted versus the non-major banks because of low risk weights for mortgage books, but there was undoubtedly a considerable amount of capital in the system before COVID. It helped that this occurred after the Royal Commission where the issue of ‘unquestionably strong’ levels of capital was front and centre.

APRA had set the tone and the phenomenal Federal Government and RBA response was also extremely helpful to the banks, which reciprocated with deferral programs, so it’s been a team effort. Assuming we stay on top of COVID (and the latest Sydney outbreak is a threat), we may be better off than we expected 12 to 18 months ago.

By our estimates, each of the major banks is sitting on between $7 and $10 billion worth of capital that can be distributed back to shareholders. So far, the banks in general have behaved rationally and have managed margins and returns. We expect capital return and capital distribution to be the key narrative over the next six to nine months.

The impact of neobanks and insurtechs

Pre-COVID, one of the big themes for the banks was digital disruption in the form of tech-savvy competitors moving into the financial services sector or overseas neobanks appealing to tech-savvy consumers in Australia.

I’m more sceptical of the neobanks and insurtechs than some of the other participants in the market. They need to get scale quickly. They need to reduce the cost of acquisition of a customer and they need a steady-state capacity level, which can drive operating leverage.

It is great that disruptors are offering a seamless customer experience but it’s very generic and it is a commoditised offering on savings. Having said that, we’ve seen some interesting offerings like Bendigo and Adelaide Bank’s digital bank, UP, and the user experience from Athena. We’ve seen 86,400 Ltd (now part of NAB) which also had a strong offering but they could not reach scale. Xinja was another big hope that went out hard with their rate offering to entice new customers, but they were unable to sustain their push into the market.

The theory of neobanks is good and they keep the incumbents honest and there are some incumbents who just will not spend money on technology. Westpac is spending on the front end but needs its back end in order. ANZ was lagging in technology and their app experience but now they’re spending money. Bank of Queensland will hopefully have a contemporary banking app soon. I think it’s fair to say that the incumbents tend to get lazy.

I agree with CBA’s CEO Matt Comyn’s comments at the recent Senate hearings that a number of technology providers are deliberately trying to build capability without an ability to scale or with a viable business model, but they may accelerate innovation if it were scaled. A lot of disruptor business models are predicated on getting taken out by the big players.

My investment logic for holding Big Four bank shares

Analysing large companies can be a joy and a pain but it is rarely boring.  Narratives are increasingly important for the markets and with large companies it is critical to get ahead of some of potential shifts in narratives. There was a point when the Big Four were really cheap in the midst of COVID. It doesn’t mean that they were riskless, but on a risk reward basis, with all the support offered by governments, the probability of banks struggling was low.

While the four majors have different strengths and operating divisions, all of them except Westpac are now a lot simpler than they used to be. Westpac still has specialist businesses that it needs to get rid of. CBA has sold its insurance businesses. ANZ doesn’t have a wealth or a life business anymore. NAB’s a pure bank now, it doesn’t have a UK bank and it doesn’t have MLC or a life business.

They’re much cleaner, core banking businesses but they are still large and complex. And it’s not just loans, they’re dealing with people and their lives and their assets and their businesses. More than ever, franchise value is tied to how the market and how consumers perceive these brands.

Register here to receive the Firstlinks weekly newsletter for free

Current take on the Big Four

NAB and CBA exhibit strong core themes that I want to see in a bank to capitalise on an improving environment. They exhibit the best franchise momentum for revenues and for volumes. NAB has managed its costs quite well while CBA, historically, has not cared as much about costs because it always grew its top line faster than costs. But this also offers CBA the biggest opportunity if it gets serious about taking costs out.

Both banks are sitting on extremely healthy levels of capital, so if they see the opportunity to drive hard for growth, they don’t have to worry about a lack of capital. So franchise momentum is critical at this juncture.

ANZ has seen its mortgage loan momentum slow, but it's also a much simpler bank under Shayne Elliott than it was six or seven years ago. I believe that ANZ has shown the most consistent discipline on costs compared to its local peers. The key is top-line momentum and that is a watching brief to see if ANZ can stabilise and turn that around.

Westpac is the one that scares me, and I don’t use those words lightly. There’s a really important chart in Westpac’s most recent result presentation. It shows Net Promoter Score momentum for Westpac and the St George brands versus the major peers in the market. It is extremely poor and, for me, that’s a key issue at this point of time.

Source: Westpac 2021 Interim Financial Results Presentation

Westpac’s cost strategy means it needs to get leaner quickly, because its competitors are not standing still. It must take costs out at a core level by about 16% over the next three-and-a-half years, while at the same time stabilising the overall business. A multi-year 16% cost reduction doesn’t come without cutting people.

So, how does Westpac manage the internal dynamics? Few companies can expect to cut people or rationalise costs while maintaining a motivated workforce to drive top-line growth. Westpac has shown some encouraging signs that their mortgage book is stabilising, but there are issues with the business bank. It is a complex business with many moving parts.

I think about the banks as a cohort in terms of the portfolio. Do I want to own banks at this point in the cycle? Yes. The banks I want to own depend on their franchise momentum, at least for the near term.


Tariq Chotani is an Equities Analyst at Perpetual Investment Management, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article contains general information only and is not intended to provide you with financial advice or consider your objectives, financial situation or needs.

For more articles and papers from Perpetual, please click here.



What happened to our gold-plated bank capital position?

Bank reporting season scorecard for FY19

Bank reporting season scorecard for FY18


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates


The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.


RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.


4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.


Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.


Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.


Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.