Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 610

Are pension rules impacting fertility?

Australia’s fertility rate has dropped to a historic low level of 1.5 births per woman, well below the replacement rate of 2.1 required to maintain a stable population. One factor affecting fertility decisions may be the availability of childcare, as it helps reduce financial and logistical barriers to child-rearing. Grandmothers are a vital source of informal childcare support for many families. However, policies that increase the labour market participation of older women, such as raising the Age Pension eligibility age from 60 to 67, may reduce grandmothers’ availability to provide childcare.

This note investigates an underexplored trade-off in policy design: how measures encouraging work among the older population can unintentionally impact their offspring’s fertility rates. Specifically, it investigates how changes to Age Pension eligibility age may have reduced grandmothers’ availability for childcare, subsequently influencing their daughters’ fertility decisions. Given Australia’s low fertility rates and aging population, this note highlights the trade-offs in designing policies that encourage labour force participation among older people without negatively affecting fertility.

Our results show:

  • The increase in the pension eligibility age delayed grandmothers’ retirement, increasing their employment rate from 25% to 36%, and hours of work by 3.9 hours per week.
  • Having a grandmother who qualifies for the pension based on her age increases the likelihood that her daughter will have a child, from 69% to 73.5%, and increases the average number of children per woman from 1.47 to 1.56. This effect on the average number of children per woman is comparable to the impact observed with the introduction of paid parental leave policies.
  • Among daughters in lower-wealth households and those with lower educational attainment, grandmother’s pension eligibility had a larger effect on fertility, suggesting that access to grandparental childcare may play a greater role in fertility decisions for these groups.
  • The increase in pension eligibility age reduces grandmothers’ ability to provide childcare by keeping them in the labour market longer. Grandmothers who are age-qualified for the pension are more likely to provide childcare, whereas those who work longer hours are less available for caregiving.

Fertility decisions are shaped by a range of factors, often reflecting a trade-off between career prospects and family planning. Support systems/arrangements, such as free or grandparental childcare, play a crucial role in easing the financial burden of child-rearing. The recent Productivity Commission report on early childhood education and care underscores the importance of grandparental childcare, highlighting its spillover effects: caring for grandchildren can act as a barrier to working for grandparents and lead them to reduce their working hours to provide this support. However, less attention has been paid to the reverse dynamic: policies aimed at increasing labour market participation among older individuals may reduce the availability of grandparental childcare, potentially impacting fertility choices among their offspring.

Census data reveal that grandparental care is predominantly provided by women, with the share of women caring for other children — likely their grandchildren — peaking around their age pension (AP) eligibility age. This pattern underscores the trade-offs they face between caregiving and labour market participation.

Figure 1: Effect of age pension eligibility on women’s labour market outcomes by age pension eligibility

What is the effect of pension reform on the labour supply of older women?

The Australian AP reform has gradually raised the minimum age for AP eligibility for women from 60 to 67, increasing by six months every two years since July 1, 1995, to decrease the fiscal cost of the aging population. Using data from the Household, Income, and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, Figure 1 illustrates that women eligible for the pension based on their age1 have lower employment rates and work fewer hours per week compared to those who are not eligible. However, this raw comparison does not account for the differences between cohorts, which are influenced by the gradual implementation of the reform. For example, consider two women born in June 1952 and June 1954, respectively. The woman born in 1952 would qualify for the pension at age 65, while the woman born in 1954 would qualify at age 66. As a result, when these women are 65 years old, one becomes eligible for the pension based on age, while the other would still be ineligible. These differences in outcomes by pension eligibility reflect not only the staggered rollout of the policy, but also the varying social and economic contexts experienced by different birth cohorts. As a result, women from different cohorts may have been influenced by varying economic, social, and labour market conditions, potentially confounding the observed relationship between pension eligibility and employment outcomes. Therefore, it is important to control for these differences.

To address this, we control for observed and unobserved, time-invariant factors affecting labour market outcomes, such as cohort-specific differences.2 After accounting for individual differences, our analysis shows that the employment rate among grandmothers eligible for the pension is 25%, compared to 36% for those who are ineligible. Additionally, eligible grandmothers worked 3.9 fewer hours per week. These results suggest that the Australian pension reform was effective in keeping older women in the labour market, achieving its intended policy goal.

What is the effect of mother’s age pension eligibility on the fertility of daughters?

Women whose mothers are eligible for the AP based on their age are more likely to have children and have more children on average, compared to women whose mothers are of similar age but ineligible (Figure 2). However, this association may also reflect cohort differences, as women whose mothers qualified for AP earlier belong to older cohorts that may have different norms, socioeconomic conditions, and characteristics.

Figure 2: Effect of mother’s age pension eligibility on fertility of daughters by age pension eligibility

After taking into account individual, age- and year-specific factors, we find that having a mother eligible for AP increases the probability of having a child from 69% to 73.5% and increases the average number of children from 1.47 to 1.56. These effects are more pronounced for women in lower-income households and those without a university degree, suggesting that grandparent support is likely more important for women facing greater financial or social constraints.

The observed impact of grandmother’s AP eligibility on the average number of births is around 4.5%, comparable to the effect of introducing paid parental leave policies, which increased the average number of births by 5% through improved childcare support and reduced financial burdens.

How does grandmothers’ pension eligibility affect their childcare provision?

The most plausible mechanism linking grandmothers’ AP eligibility to their daughters’ fertility is the availability of informal childcare. Pension reform delayed grandmothers’ retirement, which could have reduced their ability to provide childcare to their grandchildren. Our results confirm this, showing that grandmothers eligible for pension based on their age are more likely to provide childcare, with the proportion increasing from 59.4% to 63.4%. Additionally, the frequency of care increases with their pension eligibility.

We examine grandmothers’ hours of work to understand whether this increase in childcare provision is driven by the reform’s effect on grandmothers’ labour market participation. Our analysis shows that once we account for the hours worked by grandmothers, the effects of pension eligibility on the provision and frequency of childcare become smaller and less pronounced. Moreover, grandmothers who work longer hours are less likely to provide care for their grandchildren and tend to do so less frequently. Overall, our findings suggest that pension eligibility increases grandmothers’ availability for childcare by reducing their labour market participation.

These findings suggest that pension reforms that increase the eligibility age can have unintended intergenerational consequences on fertility. While such policies aim to improve fiscal sustainability and labour market outcomes, they may inadvertently reduce the availability of grandparental childcare, influencing daughters’ fertility decisions. This highlights the importance of designing policies that balance the needs of an aging population with support for young families. 

 

1 Throughout this note, pension eligibility refers only to age-based eligibility, excluding income, assets, or residency criteria.
2 We also include year-fixed effects and potentially time-varying characteristics such as education, region, etc. 

 

Dr. Pelin Akyol is an Economist and Research Manager at e61 Institute. Professor Kadir Atalay is a Postgraduate Research Coordinator (Economics) at the University of Sydney. The the full report, including references, appendices and disclaimers can be accessed here.

 

9 Comments
ChiangMaiBurningSeason
May 14, 2025

It is worth reading the work of Nate Hagens and learning about The Great Simplification. Hagens explains that our modern world is built on cheap, abundant fossil energy, and as that energy declines, so will the complexity and speed of our societies. We are facing limits not just on energy, but on ecosystems, resources, and social stability.

Trying to raise the Total Fertility Rate (TFR) ignores this reality. More people means more demand for food, energy, housing, and transport—at a time when we need to reduce our ecological footprint, not expand it. Instead of promoting more consumption and growth, we should focus on simplifying our lives, living within planetary boundaries, and ensuring a good quality of life with fewer people and fewer material demands.

A lower TFR can be part of the solution—not a problem to be fixed.

Peter
May 09, 2025

Correlation is not causation - as two other comments have pointed out.

Disgruntled
May 09, 2025

Total fertility rate has been in decline since the mid 70's.

This coincides with greater workforce participation from women.

I was born in the later years of the 60's, went to primary school in the mid to late 70's and high school in the early to mid 80's.

Most mothers were stay at home mums or worked part time. Very few of my friends mothers worked full time when I was in primary school.

Mothers working full time when I was in high school picked up amongst my friends mothers. We were older, could be left alone more.

2 income families were becoming more and more common.

Early 90's we had Howard and Costello CGT changes, families with more buying power being able to outbid/outspend single income families.

Investing for yield in property got taken over by investing for Capital Gain, early 2000's property prices began their stellar run.

Debt levels surged, working longer became a necessity to repay the increased borrowings that a 2 income family could take on.

Governments supplemented reduced birth rates by increasing immigration, adding to rental and property prices with the demand/supply metric that ensued.



Old super hand
May 09, 2025

I agree with OldbutSane. There is a lot going on over the periods concerned, with higher labour force participation for older women (and men) driven by a range of factors. Fertility rates are also impacted by a range of factors, with Age Pension eligibility age for a grandmother not likely to have much impact at all. Fertility rates have been falling in many countries, and you could just as easily link this to, say, global warming rather than changes in Age Pension or equivalent qualifying age.

OldbutSane
May 08, 2025

Just because age pension eligibility has increased and fertility has decreased does mean theat one is the consequence of the other. I'm sure one could just as easily correlated the decline in fertility to increased female participation in the workforce.

This theory would have had at least a bit of credence if the author had compared the situation in Australia with other developed countries where the fertility rate has fallen dramatically eg South Korea, Japan, Europe. To do it for one country in isolation proves nothing and to not correct for other factors like increased female participation in the workforce makes the whole analysis suspect.

John G
May 08, 2025

It seems on face value that the "retirement" age for women should be reduced to 60 or even 55. They should also be allowed to continue working part time without having the AP means tested so that they may be in a position to contribute extra to superannuation to overcome disadvantage from non-working years earlier in life.

CC
May 11, 2025

so you are suggesting that women should retire 5 - 10 years earlier than men even though they have a higher life expectancy ? come on.....

Lyn
May 13, 2025

It worked for decades when women who did work retired at 60 & cared for grandchildren so Mum coud work. Think there was article here that revealed amount of unpaid childcare Grandparents do and how that figure has dropped.The lack of free child care by grandparent was excacerbated by moving female retirement first to 65, and more so to 67, same as men. It is only in 1991 that Child Care benefit became available for use for ' for- profit providers' encouraging more investment in the field so more parents (generally Mum) could work fulltime. Prior to that as I can attest, it was very expensive with no subsidy so often only highly paid women could afford it. For me it was half my after-tax income, no available grandmother anyway.
Article is about birth rate but has to go hand in hand with Child Care cost. Looked it up, range $70-200/day & child care subsidy in some cases up to 90%/child so if $120/day it costs Govt $540/wk in subsidy. All taxpayers are funding a commercial enterprise for profit. How does that sit with you? Reducing retirement age for 1 grandparent to say, 62 ( male or female) on a full pension and as years go on re Super there will be lesser full pensions to pay, it's simliar to full pension $. Research is divided but having 1 in F/time care and another not, my opinion is one not in Child Care is more successful and confident so I believe being in care of family is better, would re-do my first decision in a blink if had time again or had had a grandparent available. The idea that 1 grandparent retires earlier is not as mad as you perhaps think. On a national basis it may lead to better outcomes for many kids and society generally.

James
May 15, 2025

@Lyn.

Full of gaping holes! What guarantee is there that an early retiring grandparent will look after grandchildren, thus lessening the tax payer burden? They may not live close or even in the same state. How would that be monitored or enforced? What cost to the tax payer to ensure compliance? This sort of concept is poison is society, introducing small groups of privileged people who get special treatment. It is divisive. Should indigenous people get access to the pension earlier because they have lower life expectancy?

Childcare is a dog's breakfast. Government subsidies have done little but push prices up and made childcare centre owners richer. There is no requirement that a parent must actually go to work either. Tax payer money is no doubt in some cases funding morning gym, yoga and cafe time! Labor is about to make it worse, basically removing means testing.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Why Australia’s roaring population growth won’t last

Population and ageing nonsense … again

Embracing the bright side of population decline

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Pros and cons of Labor's home batteries scheme

Labor has announced a $2.3 billion Cheaper Home Batteries Program, aimed at slashing the cost of home batteries. The goal is to turbocharge battery uptake, though practical difficulties may prevent that happening.

Howard Marks: the investing game has changed

The famed investor says the rapid switch from globalisation to trade wars is the biggest upheaval in the investing environment since World War Two. And a new world requires a different investment approach.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 606 with weekend update

The boss of Australia’s fourth largest super fund by assets, UniSuper’s John Pearce, says Trump has declared an economic war and he’ll be reducing his US stock exposure over time. Should you follow suit?

  • 10 April 2025

4 ways to take advantage of the market turmoil

Every crisis throws up opportunities. Here are ideas to capitalise on this one, including ‘overbalancing’ your portfolio in stocks, buying heavily discounted LICs, and cherry picking bombed out sectors like oil and gas.

An enlightened dividend path

While many chase high yields, true investment power lies in companies that steadily grow dividends. This strategy, rooted in patience and discipline, quietly compounds wealth and anchors investors through market turbulence.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Investment strategies

Does dividend investing make sense?

Dividend investing offers steady income and behavioral benefits, but its effectiveness depends on goals, market conditions, and fundamentals - especially in retirement, where it may limit full use of savings.

Economics

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

Strategy

Ageing in spurts

Fascinating initial studies suggest that while we age continuously in years, our bodies age, not at a uniform rate, but in spurts at around ages 44 and 60.

Interviews

Platinum's new international funds boss shifts gears

Portfolio Manager Ted Alexander outlines the changes that he's made to Platinum's International Fund portfolio since taking charge in March, while staying true to its contrarian, value-focused roots.

Investment strategies

Four ways to capitalise on a forgotten investing megatrend

The Trump administration has not killed the multi-decade investment opportunity in decarbonisation. These four industries in particular face a step-change in demand and could reward long-term investors.

Strategy

How the election polls got it so wrong

The recent federal election outcome has puzzled many, with Labor's significant win despite a modest primary vote share. Preference flows played a crucial role, highlighting the complexity of forecasting electoral results.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.