Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 124

Busting the bond myth

The decline in interest rates to historic lows in recent years has led to anxiety among Australian investors about what will happen to their fixed interest holdings when overnight interest rates begin to rise.

This apprehension is based on the conventional view that longer-dated bonds underperform in this type of rising interest rate environment.

However, historical analysis of past periods of increasing interest rates in the US and Australia show there is no guarantee that bonds do badly relative to short-dated securities at such times.

In fact, in most of the five distinct periods covered by this study, longer-dated bonds outperformed their shorter-dated equivalents.

The second deduction from this analysis is the reinforcement of the virtues of global diversification in fixed interest. In each period, a globally diversified portfolio of bonds outperformed an Australian-only portfolio.

Thirdly, the experiment confirms that even during periods of rising short-term interest rates, bonds can continue to play a diversification role in a balanced portfolio, reducing overall volatility and expanding investors’ opportunity set.


Interest rates and monetary conditions in developed economies have been maintained at extraordinarily easy levels since the global financial crisis as central banks sought to generate self-sustaining recoveries.

A dominant theme recently relates to how and when central banks will start to reduce this level of accommodation and what the impact on risky assets will be. Market sentiment has waxed and waned. Most attention has been on the US Federal Reserve, which has flagged an increase in its funds target rate over the coming months. The rate has been close to zero now for nearly seven years since the peak of the GFC.

The Fed began the process of normalising monetary policy in late 2013, gradually winding back its purchases of bonds. This ‘quantitative easing’ programme added more than $US3.5 trillion to the Fed’s balance sheet over five years.

But central banks elsewhere have shown no hurry to follow. The Bank of England has kept its benchmark at 0.50% for six years. At its August 2015 meeting, just one of the nine members of its monetary policy committee voted for an increase.

The European Central Bank, having resisted quantitative easing for years, began its own programme this year. It is buying 60 billion euros of assets a month in a bid to lift inflation back towards its target of just under 2% by late 2016.

The Reserve Bank of Australia has cut the official cash rate 10 times since November 2011 to 2.0%. With commodity prices falling and inflation pressures contained, the bank has recently indicated that it is in no hurry to raise rates.

Bonds 101

The market values of bonds rise and fall on changing expectations for inflation and interest rates, shifting perceptions about the creditworthiness of individual issuers, and fluctuations in the general appetite for risk.

The yield on a bond and the price of that bond are inversely related. If the price falls, it means investors are demanding an additional return to compensate for the risk of holding the bond.

So if interest rates ‘can only go up’ from current levels, why hold bonds? There are a few points to make in response.

First, it is extremely hard to accurately forecast interest rates with any consistency. Standard & Poor’s regular scorecard shows most managers fail to outpace bond benchmarks over periods of five years or more (Standard & Poor’s Indices Versus Active Funds Scorecard).

Second, outside of the US, there is no guarantee that rates will rise anytime soon. Even in the US, some observers doubt whether the Fed will carry through.

Third, bonds perform differently to shares. Regardless of what is happening with the rate cycle, there is a diversification benefit in holding bonds in your portfolio and making for a smoother ride.

Fourth, each investor’s allocation to the risks associated with bonds, both from a maturity and credit quality standpoint, is an individual decision dependent on each individual’s risk appetite, circumstances and goals.

Finally, if you look at history, it has not always been the case that longer-term bonds have underperformed shorter-term bonds when short-term interest rates are rising.

A case study

To test that last statement, we carried out a case study of periods of rising rates from the last three decades in both the US and Australia.

To meet the definition of a rising interest rate environment, the increases had to be spread out over 12 months or more and cumulative increases had to be at least 1.5%. Table 2 shows the periods under study.

In the US case, using Barclays’ indices, we found that in two of these four periods long-term bonds did better than shorter-to-intermediate-term bonds. In the other two periods longer term bonds underperformed. See Figure 1.

For the Australian case study we used Citigroup World Government Bond indices. Figure 2 compares the performance of Australian Government bonds over the 1-3-year maturity (in blue) and longer maturities (in green).

We can see that the longer-term bonds actually outperformed the shorter-dated bonds during all periods except for the infamous 1994–95 market correction.

Similar results were seen when we compared the performance of a global bond portfolio, hedged to the $A, compared with a domestic-only portfolio.

While this may seem counter-intuitive, remember that longer-term bond holders are often reassured when a central bank is perceived as moving pre-emptively against this threat of higher inflation.

The study also shows bonds continued to provide positive returns, contradicting the often expressed view that rising interest rates are always associated with bond losses. The exception in this study is the late 70s when the longest-term US bonds suffered during a period of very sharp increases in rates.


Investors are worried about what will happen to their fixed income portfolios when central banks begin normalising interest rates, yet recent decades show longer-term bonds do not always underperform when short-term rates are rising.

In any case, there is no need to forecast. There is sufficient information in today’s prices to base a strategy on. Furthermore, we believe risk can be tempered by diversifying across different types of bonds, different maturities and different countries.


Dr Steve Garth is a Portfolio Manager in Sydney with Dimensional, a wholesale asset manager with more than $500 billion under management globally. This article is for educational purposes and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.



Is 'shaken and stirred' coming? The risky business of bonds

Are you in fixed interest for the duration?

Income-seekers: these 'myths' could come back to haunt you


Most viewed in recent weeks

Lessons when a fund manager of the year is down 25%

Every successful fund manager suffers periods of underperformance, and investors who jump from fund to fund chasing results are likely to do badly. Selecting a manager is a long-term decision but what else?

2022 election survey results: disillusion and disappointment

In almost 1,000 responses, our readers differ in voting intentions versus polling of the general population, but they have little doubt who will win and there is widespread disappointment with our politics.

Now you can earn 5% on bonds but stay with quality

Conservative investors who want the greater capital security of bonds can now lock in 5% but they should stay at the higher end of credit quality. Rises in rates and defaults mean it's not as easy as it looks.

30 ETFs in one ecosystem but is there a favourite?

In the last decade, ETFs have become a mainstay of many portfolios, with broad market access to most asset types, as well as a wide array of sectors and themes. Is there a favourite of a CEO who oversees 30 funds?

Betting markets as election predictors

Believe it or not, betting agencies are in the business of making money, not predicting outcomes. Is there anything we can learn from the current odds on the election results?

Meg on SMSFs – More on future-proofing your fund

Single-member SMSFs face challenges where the eventual beneficiaries (or support team in the event of incapacity) will be the member’s adult children. Even worse, what happens if one or more of the children live overseas?

Latest Updates


'It’s your money' schemes transfer super from young to old

Policy proposals allow young people to access their super for a home bought from older people who put the money back into super. It helps some first buyers into a home earlier but it may push up prices.

Investment strategies

Rising recession risk and what it means for your portfolio

In this environment, safe-haven assets like Government bonds act as a diversifier given the uncorrelated nature to equities during periods of risk-off, while offering a yield above term deposit rates.

Investment strategies

‘Multidiscipline’: the secret of Bezos' and Buffett’s wild success

A key attribute of great investors is the ability to abstract away the specifics of a particular domain, leaving only the important underlying principles upon which great investments can be made.


Keep mandatory super pension drawdowns halved

The Transfer Balance Cap limits the tax concessions available in super pension funds, removing the need for large, compulsory drawdowns. Plus there are no requirements to draw money out of an accumulation fund.


Confession season is upon us: What’s next for equity markets

Companies tend to pre-position weak results ahead of 30 June, leading to earnings downgrades. The next two months will be critical for investors as a shift from ‘great expectations’ to ‘clear explanations’ gets underway.


Australia, the Lucky Country again?

We may have been extremely unlucky with the unforgiving weather plaguing the East Coast of Australia this year. However, on the economic front we are by many measures in a strong position relative to the rest of the world.

Exchange traded products

LIC discounts widening with the market sell-off

Discounts on LICs and LITs vary with market conditions, and many prominent managers have seen the value of their assets fall as well as discount widen. There may be opportunities for gains if discounts narrow.



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.