Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 167

Chasing yields is paying dividends

The Australian equity market has performed well over the past few months, though it is once again facing valuations challenges. Irrespective of how the market deals with this challenge, one fact is indisputable: income returns from the market remain attractive relative to interest rates.

Market rebounds amid valuation concerns

The S&P/ASX 200 has staged a feisty comeback (see chart below) and is now over the 5500 barrier. However, this rise has come amid continued weakness in forward earnings. The market’s price-to-forward earnings ratio has again increased to the peak of just over 16 times we saw in early-2015 when the market last ran out of steam. In fact, market prices remain lower now than in early 2015, despite similar PE valuations, due to a decline in forward earnings expectations over this period.

S&P/ASX 200 Index vs Price-to-forward earnings ratio

S&P/ASX 200 Index vs Price-to-forward earnings ratio

By other measures, however, the market is less overvalued, and potentially cheap. For example, the market’s gross dividend yield (GDY) as of late July 2016 was 6%, which is still significantly above the approximately 2% rate available on 10-year government bond yields and 2.4% on 1-year bank term deposits.

The margin between the GDY and these interest rates is currently around 3.75-4%, which is considerably higher than the (relatively stable) average margin of around 0.75% p.a. between 2003 and 2013. At today’s interest rate levels, retention of this previous average margin would justify a gross dividend yield of only 3.25%, or almost half the current rate.

Does this mean that the market is cheap and should simply surge to reduce the dividend yield? Not necessarily. One complication is the fact that earnings have been relatively weak in recent years, and maintaining a stable dividend yield in the face of rising equity prices has required a rising payout ratio.

Stretched payout ratios

Indeed, the implied payout ratio – or the ratio of the GDY to the forward-earnings yield (inverse of the forward PE ratio) – has risen to about 100% in recent months, compared with a long-run average of around 75-80%. Relative to earnings, the current level of dividends appears unsustainable. Earnings will rise and/or dividends will fall to restore a more normal payout ratio.

S&P/ASX 200 Dividend & Earnings and Implied Payout Ratio

Given that dividend yields remain so high relative to interest rates, they are likely to remain attractive even if they do fall to some extent. Let’s assume two scenarios, for example, that earnings hold around current levels for some time, but dividends are eventually cut by 20%, restoring the payout ratio to 80%.

That would imply a decline in the GDY to 4.9%, which is still a substantial 2.4% p.a margin over current 10-year bond yields and 1-year term deposits, while keeping the price-to-forward earnings ratio at its present relatively elevated level of 16.3.

But if interest rates were to hold at current levels, however, there’s even some chance that equity market valuations could be ‘rerated’. This is explored in the table below.

Again, let’s assume that the sustainable margin between the GDY and interest rates referred to above declines to around 1.5% p.a. (which is still twice that averaged between 2003 and 2013), then the gross dividend yield could decline to 4% p.a. Assuming an 80% payout ratio, that in turn would imply a sustainable price-to-forward earnings ratio of 20x!

If we allow for a moderate 1.5% rise in interest rates (to 3.5% p.a.), then keeping all else constant the GDY could still fall to 5%, implying a sustainable price-to-forward earnings ratio of 16x – or not far from current levels.

Dividend yield scenarios

Official interest rates could fall even further in coming months, suggesting the high-yield equity theme is likely to continue. There’s even a chance the equity market could be rerated higher if interest rates remain below historic average levels.


David Bassanese is Chief Economist at BetaShares, whose range of Exchange Traded Funds include high-yield Australian equity investments with ASX codes QFN (aims to track the S&P/ASX200 Financial–x-A-REIT index), HVST (aims to provide investors with a strong income stream from dividends and franking) and YMAX (aims to provide exposure to the S&P/ASX20 index while cushioning returns in weak markets). BetaShares is a sponsor of Cuffelinks. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.


Leave a Comment:



3 principles for finding dividend sustainability

High dividend yields support equity returns

Not all global equities are created equally


Most viewed in recent weeks

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Latest Updates


$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.


Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.