Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 483

Darryl and Sal Kerrigan are now private equity investors

In 1997, the low-budget cult hit film, ‘The Castle’, which depicted the quintessential Aussie family and the fight for their home, was released to critical acclaim. The famous line, “A man’s home is his castle”, captured then, as now, the Australian dream of owning a home, traditionally one’s largest and most important asset. Little did the Kerrigans, introduced to us a mere five years after compulsory superannuation, realise that we’d accumulate trillions of dollars in superannuation wealth, increasingly concentrated in mega funds that have now become some of the largest allocators of capital in the world.

In the last decade, these mega funds have increasingly been allocating low and middle-income Australia’s hard-earned dollars in sophisticated and opaque unlisted assets. Gone are the days of just owning a holiday rental in Bonnie Doon. The Kerrigans are now private equity investors.

The problem is these assets don't trade on an open market and are valued infrequently. Big super, or the mega funds, sell this as a feature, smoothing the ups and downs of the investment cycle. However, as these funds offer thousands of co-mingled members daily liquidity to contribute or withdraw funds, there is a funding mismatch. And are these valuations fictitious or real?

How private equity returns are calculated

Private Equity 101 would suggest we ask a private equity manager what their historical rate of return - typically measured as Internal Rate of Return (IRR) - is across all their deals. Breaking up this track record across funds or ‘vintages’ also helps to consider a manager’s performance across the investment cycle. Whilst gross IRR reports total return, net IRR shows the return net of all fees, essential for assessing how much of the pie the manager is eating before they feed you. Realised IRR shows the return to investors from investments that have been exited. If Net IRR is notably higher than Realised IRR, then unrealised investments in the strategy may be getting carried at very high values.

The Total Value to Paid In ratio (TVPI) measures the sum of distributions and carrying value on investments made as a multiple of all funds paid into that vehicle. For example, a TVPI of 2.0x would indicate that at today’s carrying value, an investor has doubled the money they have contributed – paper wealth. The Distributions to Paid In ratio (DPI) strips out carrying value and merely shows how much has been paid back to date – money in the bank. The goal is to convert carrying value embedded in TVPI into DPI as a vintage matures and underlying assets are successfully exited. If a manager has old vintages where TVPI is still much larger than DPI, questions need to be asked.

Currently the amount of TVPI over DPI is at record levels at an industry level. As carrying values have become inflated over the last decade, some experts estimate that it will take as much as $600 billion of impairments in Venture Capital alone to get TVPI back down to historical norms. Private Equity is an even bigger beast.

Since 1994, 1,276 private equity funds over $1 billion have been raised around the world. Only 22 have managed to return more than 2.3x, a return considered consummate to compensate for the risk and illiquidity of these investments. The law of large numbers dictates the larger a private equity fund is, the harder to realise returns. Larger ‘winners’ are required to pay back the invested capital, something data shows is hard to do at scale. Yet the big super funds, due to their size, often preference these larger deals.

Private market valuations haven't caught up to public markets

It’s hard to know if these dynamics are at play within the super funds, yet as the liquidity tide goes out and public market valuations have been crushed, requisite valuation moves are yet to occur in private markets. Much of the capital globally has been allocated in recent vintages at a time when carrying values and TVPI are far above historical norms. If they invest like private equity investors, Big Super should be required to report like private equity investors. What is the level of unrealised returns they are reporting to members relative to the historical norms they have traditionally been able to realise?

As the illiquidity of these funds' increases, so too does their liquidity risk. Worryingly, APRA has said some funds lack formal liquidity and stress-testing processes whilst others fail to incorporate results into the investment decision making process. All these funds offer daily liquidity and pricing to members who are free to withdraw pensions, contribute funds or switch investment options at the click of a button. Yet many of the underlying assets are valued quarterly at best and are completely illiquid.

Reform is needed

Standardised liquidity and stress testing should be introduced, and the findings made public, along with the methodology and assumptions used, just as it is for banks. This way, Australians can assess the funding risks inherent in their super.

Innovations are on the way to provide more liquidity for unlisted assets. Platforms where investors can allocate to private assets, but also realise them sooner by listing them in a secondary market, are now available. Listed Investment Trusts (LITs) and Listed Investment Companies (LICs) are vehicles listed on public exchanges that can hold unlisted assets and provide daily liquidity at prevailing market pricing. Given disclosure requirements in public markets, reporting is essential and far superior to that provided by the mega funds.

Previously exploited by public market equity managers as asset gathering exercises, the image of LITs and LICs has been tarnished by conflicted commissions, poor performance and thin liquidity. Rejuvenation efforts are underway to build and scale these listed vehicles into credible offerings of unlisted assets for the masses.

Further out on the horizon, massive investment in financial technology and innovation is taking place. The best software engineers from the best schools are joining the crypto and blockchain arms race to create the most effective ‘Dex’s’ (Decentralised Exchanges) that contain ‘AMMs’ (Automated Market Makers), which pool liquidity from users and price assets using algorithms. The aim is to create deep liquidity for all assets at low transaction fees 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, where nearly any asset or ownership right can be tokenised with key terms coded into a smart contract.

Whilst many attempts will fail, the history of finance and money has taught us that innovation always outpaces regulators and governments. It's innovation that is required to reduce these frictions. Such change will take decades, but the irony is some of the biggest problems associated with unlisted assets may come from the private markets themselves.

In the interim, Big Super will argue that increased disclosures and scrutiny will divulge commercially sensitive information that is contrary to their members’ interests. The reality is the information can be presented in a way that respects these concerns. Whilst a reasonable allocation to unlisted assets can improve portfolio outcomes, transparency is key, so risks can be properly scrutinised.

 

Kieran Rooney is a Senior Consultant at Evergreen Consultants. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 

4 Comments
Fred
November 12, 2022

A very uninformed article, trying hard to attack the wonderful secure investment performance of industry funds. Sorry but your average financial planner has zero chance of delivering returns to compete with industry funds.
With investments across the world, in airports, ports, rail, pipelines, property, global businesses, industry funds have solid reasons for their performance.
Your suburban SMSF has no chance of competing.
Nice try, but a futile attempt!

Wayne peters
November 12, 2022

Fred, 90% of fund managers underperform the index. And super funds will be different, eh? Many of the tech companies funded by PE and venture will end up as zeros but super funds will be slow to recognise this.

Fred
November 12, 2022

You didn’t read my response!! I said nothing about those, they don’t make the difference. The investments out of reach of the suburban financial planner and SMSF client makes the difference, not fund managers!

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Is your industry super fund too illiquid for its safety?

Big Super’s asset allocation and future headwinds

Your super fund will pay you to leave - UPDATED

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are LICs licked?

LICs are continuing to struggle with large discounts and frustrated investors are wondering whether it’s worth holding onto them. This explains why the next 6-12 months will be make or break for many LICs.

Retirement income expectations hit new highs

Younger Australians think they’ll need $100k a year in retirement - nearly double what current retirees spend. Expectations are rising fast, but are they realistic or just another case of lifestyle inflation?

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 627 with weekend update

This week, I got the news that my mother has dementia. It came shortly after my father received the same diagnosis. This is a meditation on getting old and my regrets in not getting my parents’ affairs in order sooner.

  • 4 September 2025

5 charts every retiree must see…

Retirement can be daunting for Australians facing financial uncertainty. Understand your goals, longevity challenges, inflation impacts, market risks, and components of retirement income with these crucial charts.

Why super returns may be heading lower

Five mega trends point to risks of a more inflation prone and lower growth environment. This, along with rich market valuations, should constrain medium term superannuation returns to around 5% per annum.

The hidden property empire of Australia’s politicians

With rising home prices and falling affordability, political leaders preach reform. But asset disclosures show many are heavily invested in property - raising doubts about whose interests housing policy really protects.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Why I dislike dividend stocks

If you need income then buying dividend stocks makes perfect sense. But if you don’t then it makes little sense because it’s likely to limit building real wealth. Here’s what you should do instead.

Superannuation

Meg on SMSFs: Indexation of Division 296 tax isn't enough

Labor is reviewing the $3 million super tax's most contentious aspects: lack of indexation and the tax on unrealised gains. Those fighting for change shouldn’t just settle for indexation of the threshold.

Shares

Will ASX dividends rise over the next 12 months?

Market forecasts for ASX dividend yields are at a 30-year low amid fears about the economy and the capacity for banks and resource companies to pay higher dividends. This pessimism seems overdone.

Shares

Expensive market valuations may make sense

World share markets seem toppy at first glance, though digging deeper reveals important nuances. While the top 2% of stocks are pricey, they're also growing faster, and the remaining 98% are inexpensive versus history.

Fixed interest

The end of the strong US dollar cycle

The US dollar’s overvaluation, weaker fundamentals, and crowded positioning point to further downside. Diversifying into non-US equities and emerging market debt may offer opportunities for global investors.

Investment strategies

Today’s case for floating rate notes

Market volatility and uncertainty in 2025 prompt the need for a diversified portfolio. Floating Rate Notes offer stability, income, and protection against interest rate risks, making them a valuable investment option.

Strategy

Breaking down recent footy finals by the numbers

In a first, 2025 saw AFL and NRL minor premiers both go out in straight sets. AFL data suggests the pre-finals bye is weakening the stranglehold of top-4 sides more than ever before.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.