Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 203

Diversification captures the winning outliers

At a conceptual level, diversification is about spreading risk and not putting all our eggs in one basket. Quantitatively, as I’ve previously explained, one of the main benefits of diversification is lowering the volatility for a given level of expected return. Another way of looking at it is that diversification allows an improvement in returns for a given level of risk, either through levering up to our desired risk tolerance or by capturing positive outliers in the return distribution of stocks in the market.

A few stocks can drive the overall index

Both here and abroad, a concentration of stock returns has often driven overall market performance, in that a relatively small number of large-cap ‘winners’ can carry an entire index. One key implication is there is potentially a large opportunity cost of not holding the index or a broad market portfolio, particularly in a bull market, either through attempts at stock picking or trying to diversify using only a few stocks. By constructing a narrow portfolio using a limited number of securities, significant returns might be left on the table.

Much has been written about the underperformance of most active managers against their respective benchmarks, and one possible reason is the degree of outperformance by a relatively small number of stocks. These positive outliers may not have been held or have been held underweight by underperforming active managers, dragging down overall fund returns relative to the index.

To investigate the degree that a small number of stocks drive index performance, let’s decompose the returns in the S&P/ASX200 Total Return Index over the past few years and find out which stocks were the key drivers of index performance during broad market rallies.

S&P/ASX200 Total Return Attribution

Source: Bloomberg. Total returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance is not an indication of future performance.

The table shows that in most return periods in recent years, a few large cap stocks have driven the S&P/ASX 200’s returns. For example, just 4 stocks – CBA, WBC, CSL and TLS – accounted for 51% of the index’s 55.29% total return (4.5% annualised) over the past 10 years, with the average return of just those stocks 256% over the period (13.5% annualised).

Active managers need to pick these winners

There are a number of ways of interpreting the results. One is that large index-beating return possibilities have existed by picking the right stocks in recent years. However, the risk of underperformance and likelihood of failing to include the right stocks are also large because the number of index drivers have been so few.

It would be remiss not to point out that the reverse could well happen during a bear market, where a handful of large-caps could drive the overall index lower. For example, BHP was a particularly large driver of 2011’s market correction and weighed heavily on S&P/ASX200 returns in 2014 and 2015. But assuming we’re taking a long-term view, the market tends to trend upwards over time.

Caution is also needed regarding the nature of market cap weighting, as past ‘winners’ will account for an increasingly larger index share over time, which we’ve seen for the major banks. This may increase the likelihood that yesterday’s heroes could become tomorrow’s broad market villains in a correction, due to the nature of their outsized weightings. Using an alternative weighting strategy to market cap (such as Research Affiliates’ fundamental weighting methodology) can potentially reduce this risk.

If you have a particularly strong view and have confidence in the stock picking abilities of yourself or a fund manager, you should back yourself. However, it’s worth keeping in mind that failure to pick the few stocks that drive an index’s returns could generate significant underperformance.

 

Chamath De Silva is an Assistant Portfolio Manager at BetaShares Capital. BetaShares is a sponsor of Cuffelinks and issues broad market ETFs such as AUST, QOZ, GEAR or WRLD. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

RELATED ARTICLES

Changing times as share investors settle in for the long haul

Worried about low rates, SMSFs drop banks and diversify

Headwinds and tailwinds, a decade in review

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Maybe it’s time to consider taxing the family home

Australia could unlock smarter investment and greater equity by reforming housing tax concessions. Rethinking exemptions on the family home could benefit most Australians, especially renters and owners of modest homes.

Supercharging the ‘4% rule’ to ensure a richer retirement

The creator of the 4% rule for retirement withdrawals, Bill Bengen, has written a new book outlining fresh strategies to outlive your money, including holding fewer stocks in early retirement before increasing allocations.

Simple maths says the AI investment boom ends badly

This AI cycle feels less like a revolution and more like a rerun. Just like fibre in 2000, shale in 2014, and cannabis in 2019, the technology or product is real but the capital cycle will be brutal. Investors beware.

Why we should follow Canada and cut migration

An explosion in low-skilled migration to Australia has depressed wages, killed productivity, and cut rental vacancy rates to near decades-lows. It’s time both sides of politics addressed the issue.

Are franking credits worth pursuing?

Are franking credits factored into share prices? The data suggests they're probably not, and there are certain types of stocks that offer higher franking credits as well as the prospect for higher returns.

Are LICs licked?

LICs are continuing to struggle with large discounts and frustrated investors are wondering whether it’s worth holding onto them. This explains why the next 6-12 months will be make or break for many LICs.

Latest Updates

A nation of landlords and fund managers

Super and housing dwarf every other asset class in Australia, and they’ve both become too big to fail. Can they continue to grow at current rates, and if so, what are the implications for the economy, work and markets?

Economy

The hidden property empire of Australia’s politicians

With rising home prices and falling affordability, political leaders preach reform. But asset disclosures show many are heavily invested in property - raising doubts about whose interests housing policy really protects.

Retirement

Retiring debt-free may not be the best strategy

Retiring with debt may have advantages. Maintaining a mortgage on the family home can provide a line of credit in retirement for flexibility, extra income, and a DIY reverse mortgage strategy.

Shares

Why the ASX is losing Its best companies

The ASX is shrinking not by accident, but by design. A governance model that rewards detachment over ownership is driving capital into private hands and weakening public markets.

Investment strategies

3 reasons the party in big tech stocks may be over

The AI boom has sparked investor euphoria, but under the surface, US big tech is showing cracks - slowing growth, surging capex, and fading dominance signal it's time to question conventional tech optimism.

Investment strategies

Resilience is the new alpha

Trade is now a strategic weapon, reshaping the investment landscape. In this environment, resilient companies - those capable of absorbing shocks and defending margins - are best positioned to outperform.

Shares

The DNA of long-term compounding machines

The next generation of wealth creation is likely to emerge from founder influenced firms that combine scalable models with long-term alignment. Four signs can alert investors to these companies before the crowds.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.