Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 130

Don’t have retirement village regrets

The stories of people moving into a retirement community and suffering buyer regret years later when they realise what they get back have been well told. The ABC’s 7.30 programme highlighted the issue again recently with a story about children who had seemingly done the right thing and read the agreement yet were shocked at the actual cost when their mother’s unit was sold six years later and the retirement village operator received circa $76,000.

Such stories also contribute to the other type of buyer regret – people who wish they had made the move sooner.

Understand the arrangements before you move

No matter which type of regret, it is too late to do anything about it now. You can’t wind back the clock and move into the village sooner and if you are at the point of leaving the village it is too late to negotiate a different financial arrangement. What they needed was to identify the village or villages that would meet their lifestyle needs and have the legal and financial aspects explained to them well before they moved in.

Of course, that’s easier said than done as many of the legal and financial arrangements are complicated.

Let’s start at the start.

Retirement communities can be broadly grouped into Retirement Villages and Over 55 Communities (sometimes called Manufactured Home Parks). Retirement Villages operate under the relevant state or territory legislation, often The Retirement Villages Act, which sets age requirements and deals with some but not all financial arrangements. A small number operate under residential tenancy laws. Over 55’s, on the other hand, operate under caravan park or residential tenancies arrangements or a combination of the two.

The legal contract for a Retirement Village unit can take a number of forms, from strata title to the more common leasehold and licence arrangements. In some cases, company share and unit trust arrangements give the right to occupy a unit in exchange for the purchase of shares in a company or units in a trust. In an Over 55’s community, the contract is over the land rather than the unit - the purchaser owns the unit and has a leasehold or lease over the land. Of course, there is a big difference between having a 12 month lease and having a 99 year leasehold arrangement. It also creates the interesting situation of being a homeowner and a tenant at exactly the same time.

Costs associated with different structures

Whether the person lives in a Retirement Village or an Over 55’s community, the form of legal ownership will dictate their rights and responsibilities in relation to their unit and the costs associated with it while they live in the community and after they leave - so it’s important to understand.

The costs can be broken down into the ingoing, the ongoing and the outgoing.

The ingoing is the amount the person pays for their right to occupy their unit together with other costs such as contract preparation fees or stamp duty.

The ongoing costs will include the expenses associated with the facilities and management of the community. In a Retirement Village, these are often called general service charges or recurrent charges and in Over 55 communities they are known as site fees as well as the resident’s own personal expenses. In many retirement communities the operator delivers (or engages with external providers to deliver) extra services, such as domestic help, meals and in some cases, care. These services are normally offered on a user pays basis and are in addition to the other costs. Residents are normally responsible for their own utilities as well. Making a budget that incorporates all the costs including pension entitlements, rent assistance and other income is a good idea.

The cost of leaving a retirement community normally causes the greatest confusion. There are many different exit fee models, most based on either the purchase price or the sale price and are for a percentage multiplied by the number of years the resident stays in the village. A common model historically has been 3% per year for 10 years based on the sale price. In more recent times, exit fee models have tended to be higher, and anywhere between 35% and 45% is not uncommon.

What many people fail to appreciate is that there is more to the exit fee calculation than just the percentage-based cost, often referred to as the Deferred Management Fee or DMF. There can be sales commissions to the village or to an agent and refurbishment costs to bring the unit up to the current standard within the village. Understanding all of the fees and charges and putting them into dollar terms is important, although it often involves the imperfect science of predicting how long the resident will live in the village and what their unit will be worth when they sell.

The Retirement Living Handbook

To help people navigate the maze and avoid some of the traps, Noel Whittaker and I have teamed up again to write The Retirement Living Handbook. It covers the important aspects of moving to a retirement community from finding the right retirement community to the different forms of legal contract and financial arrangements through to the impacts on pension entitlement and eligibility for rent assistance. There’s more than a dozen case studies from Australian retirement communities so you can see how the theory plays out in practice.

We will be hosting a book launch in Sydney on Monday 19 October 2015 and would like to extend a personal invitation to Cuffelinks readers to attend. The event will be held at 2pm at Club Central, 2 Crofts Ave in Hurstville. Noel and I will be sharing our top tips and you can have your copy of the book signed. To rsvp call 1300 855 770.

 

Rachel Lane is the Principal of Aged Care Gurus and oversees a national network of financial advisers specialising in aged care. This article is for general educational purposes and does not address anyone’s specific needs.

 

  •   16 October 2015
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Retirement communities come in different shapes and sizes

What you need to know about retirement village contracts

What the RC, Budget and Keating mean for aged care

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

The housing slide could become a crash

House prices are sliding across Australia, yet the most dangerous ingredient for a housing crash is still missing. If job losses surge amid growing economic risks, today's correction could become a historic property downturn.

Latest Updates

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

Latest from Morningstar

Does an American retirement rule work for Australians?

The 4% rule has survived decades of scrutiny, but Australia's retirement system changes the equation in ways most overlook. Before accepting or rejecting this rule of thumb, it pays to understand what really drives retirement outcomes.

Shares

Glencore lands on the ASX. Should BHP and Rio shareholders switch?

A coal-heavy miner with governance concerns isn't the obvious choice for investors. Yet, Glencore's ASX listing may offer something BHP and Rio can't. The challenge is working out whether the opportunity outweighs the risks.

Why does the system treat capital gains and losses differently?

Investors are often told not to let tax policy drive their investment decisions. Yet, under the new CGT rules, portfolio construction, volatility and even how assets are owned may have an outsized impact on their final outcome.

Economy

Three common sense reforms that Australia needs

What do frozen bank accounts, mortgage traps and pension penalties have in common? They're all symptoms of a system that makes life much harder. Yet the obvious solutions seem to have escaped the attention of Canberra.

Shares

The hidden cost of government debt for investors

Some of the important effects of rising public debt never make the headlines. Research shows the immediate effects may already be unfolding, influencing corporate behaviour in ways that many investors would never suspect.

Investment strategies

When do fundamentals matter?

Is fundamental investing losing its grip on markets? Investors continue to search for valuation-based explanations for every price move, but the dominant force behind short-term returns may be something else altogether.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.