Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 225

How state charges can kill investment returns

One of the reasons investment property is popular is that many people do not realise the full extent of the costs. They often fall in love with a place without checking all the expenses, and estate agents quote gross returns and go unchallenged. While investors may be familiar with (often understated) strata and council fees, the state government charges such as stamp duty, land tax and car space levies can come as a shock.

Even the Defence Housing Authority, a statutory authority and a major Government Business Enterprise (GBE), responsible for providing housing to defence members by selling property and leasing it back, quotes gross yields, as in the example below. Net yield before borrowing cost may be only 1%, as we’ll show later.

We have previously discussed the many costs in property (for example, here and here), and we will not repeat those points, except to note that NSW stamp duty on a $1,080,000 house would be a chunky $45,000.

This article focusses more on two other state charges which are often overlooked by investors.

Parking space levy

The property pages in our newspapers love a good car park story. It might be only 14 square meters of concrete, but it can cost over $200,000. They rarely mention the car space attracts council levies and strata fees, although there will never be a garbage collection. At least there are no water rates. A check of real estate pages reveals these gems:

$222,000 Undercover security carspace in Potts Point

“Very tightly held, this carspace is situated in 'The Chimes', a secure building accessed via McDonald Street, just off Macleay Street on the northern end of vibrant Potts Point. This space is of special interest to local businesses, local new development investors and owner occupiers wanting a car spot in Potts Point.”

$190,000 Rare separate title car space in security building

“Situated in 'St Killian' a secure building which is conveniently located between Victoria Street and Macleay Street. This is an ideal opportunity to add a car space to your apartment or business.”

These high prices are usually paid by people who want to park near their home. But in many parts (see map here) of the City of Sydney, North Sydney, Milsons Point (Category 1) and Bondi Junction, Chatswood, Parramatta and St Leonards (Category 2), investors face a parking space levy. It creates a two-tier market as owner occupiers are exempt from the levy if they live adjacent to the space. It’s the same in some other states.

Before you think a slab of concrete sounds like a solid investment, let’s look at a specific example away from the glitz of Potts Point.

In 2004, the development of an old wool store at 360 Harris Street, Pyrmont included 425 parking spaces, with prices starting at $56,000 per space. The marketing said it was “the best investment you’ll ever make”, “amazingly affordable” and “unbelievably scarce”. Two of our main newspapers helped with the marketing. A Sydney Morning Herald article (‘On the lookout’, Domain, 1 July 2004) reported hundreds of calls and that over 200 sold before public launch:

“At prices of $56,000 to $70,000 per space with long leases in place, this unique opportunity should be rushed by investors.”

The Australian Financial Review article (‘Good places to park money for useful returns’, 17 June 2004) generously quoted the agent saying:

“When something has a $56,000 starting price, it is not hard to imagine it doubling over time.”

At the time, for any investor who cared to check, the parking space levy was $840 a year. A crystal ball might have shown billions of dollars spent a decade later in the adjacent Darling Harbour and the coming boom in property prices. Secure Parking offered long-term leases. What could go wrong?

The investment yielding … nothing but a capital loss

The state government needed money, disguised as “to discourage car use in leviable districts while attracting customers to public transport”. From 1 July 2009, the levy doubled to $2,000, and it has since risen to $2,390.

In 2017, Secure Parking will pay gross rent for a car space at 360 Harris Street of about $4,000 a year (it was $3,600 in 2004). The investor pays $2,390 in parking space levy (reduced somewhat by the occupancy rate of the parking station), $680 in council rates and over $1,000 a year in strata fees. That leaves … not enough to pay the accountant to prepare the tax return.

And the value now of the car spaces that cost at least $56,000 in 2004? If you like the idea of buying a piece of Sydney real estate, right next to the new International Convention Centre and the CBD, it can be yours for only $35,000. Here’s the advertisement in Domain (at least three to choose from, and I have no vested interest in any of them). Just like 13 years ago, it’s amazingly affordable.

This development was clearly targeted at investors, and the increase in parking space levy was a material factor in destroying the value of these car spaces.

Land tax

Thousands of people own investment property, but how many realise that the next time they buy another, the land tax could remove almost half the estimated net return?

In New South Wales (and there are equivalents in other states), the land tax is currently charged at:

The tax is paid on the combined value of all the taxable land owned above the threshold. Let’s assume an investor already owns one property with a land value of $549,000, and buys the Kellyville house with a land value of $600,000. The annual land tax for the new property would be $9,000 a year.

Liability for land tax includes:

  • Vacant land even if it is generating no income, and holiday homes
  • Commercial and industrial property, including (wait for it …) car spaces
  • Payable by the owner whether an individual, company, trust or trustee of a super fund.

The principal place of residence in excluded when the property is owned by a ‘natural person’. This exemption is not affected by the size or value of the land, which is why some cash poor pensioners can sit on a $10 million harbour mansion, draw a full pension and not pay land tax.

Let’s do some quick calculations on the Kellyville investment:

Cost of house: $1,130,000 including stamp duty $45,000 plus legals and inspections, say $5,000

Gross rent: $675 a week for 52 weeks (DHA guarantees no vacancy) $35,100

Annual costs (ignoring mortgage): Water $1,144, Council $1,285, DHA service fee $5,800, Repairs say $5,000 a year. Total costs $13,229 (the DHA fee includes some 'make good' action at the end of the lease).

Net return before land tax: $35,100-$13,229= $21,871 on $1,130,000 = 1.9%.

In this example, the land tax of $9,000 then takes over 40% of the net return. Final net: 1.1%.

The investor is probably borrowing and enjoying the tax benefits of making a loss, but that’s another story.

Go in with eyes wide open

Any time you buy property, open a spreadsheet and add all the initial expenses to the purchase price. When calculating income, assume one month a year of vacancy. Subtract every cost including agent fees, and allow for increases. In a new apartment, strata fees always rise as soon as the new strata committee sees the maintenance bills. Add the state levies.

Investment loans have become more expensive lately. Make sure you have other sources of income than rent because for most investment properties in Sydney and Melbourne, the net income will not cover the mortgage. You’d better hope the capital gain kicks in … and the government does not think up another tax.

 

Graham Hand is Managing Editor of Cuffelinks.

RELATED ARTICLES

Tax reform favours apartments and owner-occupiers

Labor policies and the impact on housing

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates

Strategy

$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.

Strategy

Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.