Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 336

How to sell business real property into an SMSF

From 1 July 2018, a new law provides that in certain circumstances, the outstanding amount of a Limited Recourse Borrowing Arrangement (LRBA) will count towards the relevant member’s Total Superannuation Balance (TSB).

How will these new provisions affect the plans of SMSF members who could otherwise have benefitted from putting their business real property into their super fund?

Impact on future contributions

Let’s consider an example of Bruce and his plan to sell/transfer his property to his SMSF:

  • Bruce and his wife Linda have an SMSF of which they are the only members and trustees.
  • Bruce is 65 and Linda is 60 and in full time employment.
  • Bruce solely owns a commercial property in NSW worth $2 million and wants to sell this property to the SMSF.
  • Bruce and Linda have recently reviewed and revised the investment strategy of their SMSF.
  • Bruce and Linda have approximately $1 million and $500,000 respectively of liquid assets in their SMSF available to spend on this property purchase.
  • To fund the shortfall for the purchase price the SMSF will borrow using an LRBA.

Assuming the property is a ‘business real property’ in NSW, the SMSF’s purchase from Bruce may be eligible for stamp duty concession, meaning a potential saving of up to $94,800 on stamp duty. One of the requirements for this concession is that the purchase is financed by only Bruce’s interest in the SMSF and an LRBA (i.e. Linda’s interest of $500,000 cannot be used towards the purchase).

If the SMSF uses Bruce’s interest of $1 million, and borrows under an LRBA a further $1 million to finance the purchase, any outstanding LRBA loan amount as at the next 30 June (i.e. 30 June 2020) will count towards Bruce’s total superannuation balance as he has reached the age of 65.

It would also have applied if Bruce had not reached 65 but had borrowed from a related party.

Once added to Bruce’s TSB, it will affect his eligibility in the following financial year (i.e. FY2020/21) for carry forward concessional contributions, non-concessional contributions cap and bring forward of the non-concessional contribution caps, spouse tax offset, and segregated asset method to calculate exempt current pension income.

Not the death of the strategy

Is the strategy of selling your business real estate into your SMSF effectively dead? Not quite.

Let’s now consider a different scenario where the SMSF’s purchase is structured into two separate transactions of:

  • purchase by SMSF of the first 50% of the property to be segregated in the SMSF for sole benefit of Bruce (first purchase); and
  • purchase by the SMSF of the other 50% of the property to be segregated in the SMSF for sole benefit of Linda (second purchase).

The first purchase will:

  • only use Bruce’s balance (approx. $1 million)
  • be segregated in the fund for sole benefit of Bruce
  • be eligible for stamp duty concession (subject to other conditions being satisfied for the concession of course)
  • be transferred to the Fund Trustee(s)
  • be without any use of LRBA, thereby not affecting Bruce’s TSB.

The second purchase will:

  • only use Linda’s balance (approx. $500,000) and an LRBA loan
  • be segregated in the fund for sole benefit of Linda
  • not be eligible for stamp duty concession (full stamp duty on this 50% will be payable)
  • be transferred to a bare trustee/holding trustee for the SMSF (LRBA)
  • will not affect Bruce’s TSB as this 50% secured under the LRBA doesn’t support his superannuation interest (it is segregated for the sole benefit of Linda)
  • will not affect Linda’s TSB as she hasn’t satisfied the condition of release (i.e. has not obtained the age of 65 and is still employed)

The above example is used for the purpose of demonstrating potential implications of the new laws relating to LRBAs counting towards members’ TSB.

If you are considering a similar transaction, actual implementation would be complex and require legal, financial and tax advice as well as negotiation with the lender.

 

Jeff Song is Senior Solicitor, Division Leader Superannuation Online Services at Townsends Business & Corporate Lawyers. This article is based on an understanding of the legislation at the time of publication and individuals should seek their own financial and legal advice. 

 

  •   11 December 2019
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Individual SMSF Trusteeship directly liable for ATO fines

SMSF estate planning: Eight things to consider

Minister Jane Hume on SMSFs and superannuation reform

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

The investment that sidesteps the new tax traps

Tax rules have changed, but many investors are still using yesterday’s strategies. Insurance bonds may offer advantages for those seeking greater control, tax efficiency and certainty about their wealth.

Testamentary trusts have secured the CGT exemption

Treasury’s latest CGT reform draft delivers a win for testamentary trusts and deceased estates, exempting estate-derived gains from the 30% floor. However, questions on death and divorce rollovers remain unresolved.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Latest Updates

Planning

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Investment strategies

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Economy

Population growth masks Australia’s productivity problem

For years, investors have benefited from a seemingly reliable growth story. But recent national accounts raise uncomfortable questions about what has really been driving Australia’s economy and whether that can continue unchecked.

Investment strategies

Why tomorrow’s winners may not be today’s index leaders

The stocks that built retirement balances over the past decade now dominate many portfolios. The new challenge is whether these companies can continue meeting the increasingly high expectations embedded in today's share prices.

Investing

What earnings surprises reveal about future returns

Sometimes the most important information in an earnings result isn't the number itself. It's the possibility that the market's assumptions have been fundamentally wrong and future earnings may look very different.

SMSF strategies

Individual SMSF Trusteeship directly liable for ATO fines

A rarely discussed detail buried in SMSF structures could dramatically change who wears the cost when something goes wrong. With penalties rising, a decision many dismissed as administrative may deserve a second look.

Investment strategies

The currency bet you didn’t know you made

Buying global shares means making two bets: on the companies and on the Australian dollar. Most investors consciously choose only the first. Last financial year, the second bet cost 8.5% in returns for many investors.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.