Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 366

International LICs can have a fully franked future

The international equity listed investment company (LIC) proposition is under siege, with almost all trading for extended periods at material discounts to their net tangible asset (NTA) values. The March 2020 market crash, subsequent evaporation of liquidity and widening of the discount has driven a further nail in the coffin, giving ammunition to critics who claim the LIC structure (and listed investment trusts, or LITs) is a negative in the value equation.

So where to from here? Undoubtedly, many fund managers will put their heads in the sand and ignore the problem. Others, running small sub-scale funds will use this as an opportunity to throw in the towel and liquidate or transition to complicated and untested structures.

Dividends in global and local stock markets

But there is another solution for the crème of the crop of international LICs that has the potential to transform the sector and enable it to flourish. This solution can be found in the structural advantages of the LIC as well as the insatiable demand from Australian investors for fully franked dividends.

Historically, most of these LICs have offered meagre and volatile yields, reflecting the generally low level of dividends paid by offshore companies and the erratic nature of realising net capital gains.

Conversely, Australian investors have prized stable, higher-yielding, fully franked dividends stocks above all else, focusing on Australian ‘blue chips’. However, with so many of these stocks now slashing dividends, investors recognise the need for alternative and more secure ways of generating fully franked dividends.

Bizarre as it may seem, it is possible to transform the way in which the ‘better’ international equity LICs operate, so that these vehicles become some of the most reliable fully franked dividend-yielding stocks. It may enable them to be used as a replacement for the blue chips that have disappointed.

Why are LICs well placed to pay stable dividends?

The only requirement for a LIC to pay dividends is to have sufficient liquidity, which is extremely unlikely to be a constraint for LICs that invest in liquid stocks and have no debt. This is unlike many other companies that are limited in their ability to pay dividends due to capital constraints, illiquidity or debt covenants such as banks, infrastructure and property vehicles.

However, many LIC managers are reluctant to commit to paying out consistent ongoing dividends as this reduces size, thereby negatively impacting their fees. This is compounded by a fear of being required to pay out dividends in periods where the LIC has suffered large negative return.

However, fund managers who not only provide strong returns to investors but also focus on capital preservation during market falls should be able to meet this commitment.

In order to pay fully franked dividends, a LIC must satisfy two tests.

Firstly, it must generate profits in a specific tax-paying period or alternatively to have profit reserves, to cover the dividend.

Secondly, it must pay sufficient tax from realising net capital gains.

It is impossible to guarantee having profits in a particular tax-paying period. However, some LICs have accumulated large profit reserves, enabling them to satisfy the first test over many years to come.

Obviously LICs cannot be guaranteed to satisfy the second test, but for fund managers who generally hold their positions over multiple years and invest in liquid stocks (that make it easy to recognise capital gains by trading in-and-out of) this should be relatively straightforward to achieve.

Global equities offer more opportunities

Finally, generating stable fully franked dividends is not sufficient, as managers must also deliver good long-term performance. This should not pose a huge problem in an international equity universe which is awash with a diverse range of opportunities.

There is a risk that proceeding down the path of stable, fully franked dividends could negatively impact fund manager fees and business models. However, we believe this is a risk worth taking, especially considering the long-term benefits of strong investor demand and retaining some of the benefits of the LIC structure.

Pengana International Equities Limited (PIA) recently 'relaunched' by changing its mandate to become the first international equities LIC to aim for stable fully franked dividends as well as good long-term returns. PIA has already built up profit reserves and is managing the portfolio to take additional profits when stocks hit our price targets. 

Local investors usually turn to Australian shares to generate franking credits, but an international fund can be run with the same aspiration. In an environment where investors are desperate for fully franked dividends, it remains to be seen which other global managers have the opportunity and inclination to follow.

 

Russel Pillemer is co-founder and Chief Executive Officer of Pengana Capital Group. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 

  •   15 July 2020
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Why LIC discount harvesting is a buy-and-hold decision

LIC discounts widening with the market sell-off

How can the worst feature of LICs also be the best?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

What if Australia’s golden age of dividends is ending? Rather than overhaul your portfolio, it may be worth considering where new capital can work harder. I discuss four income strategies and the trade-offs behind each.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The ageing ‘crisis’ has not and will not happen

Rising age dependency is frequently treated as a warning sign for economies. But when actual workforce participation is examined, a strikingly different picture emerges about ageing, productivity and economic sustainability.

Retirement

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Shares

Four charts that expose market concentration risk

Investors have recently been rewarded for backing market leaders, but history suggests this eventually comes at a cost. Now may be the time to review whether your portfolio is carrying unintended risks beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The case for gearing beyond property

Most Australians gear into property but ignore shares. That may be a mistake. Used carefully, geared equity strategies can enhance long-term returns, reduce cash tied up in growth assets and support retirement income goals.

Economy

Australia's $1 trillion debt pile

The headlines exclaiming that Australian government debt has hit A$1 trillion and US government debt has hit $40 trillion has turned heads, but how serious are they really? Will Australia's mix of debt create challenges?

Economy

Has 100 years of growth made us any happier?

For decades, GDP has been the benchmark for economic success, but has it made us materially happier? If happiness does not rise in lockstep with prosperity, are we overlooking what constitutes a successful society?

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.