Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 644

Is the world's safest currency actually the riskiest?

For generations, the US dollar has been regarded as the ultimate ‘safe haven’. In times of uncertainty, global investors instinctively seek the depth, liquidity, and unrivalled status of the world’s reserve currency. But what if that confidence is misplaced? What if the US dollar is actually the riskiest major currency to own today?

The dollar’s historical appeal is easy to understand. The US is home to efficient and liquid financial markets and numerous world-class companies, and its government debt is viewed as ‘risk free’ thanks to strong institutions that have treated foreign investors fairly. That trust has helped the US attract roughly $4.5 trillion of net capital inflows over the past five years.

But the market turbulence of early 2025 was a wake-up call. The ‘Liberation Day’ sell-off was a reminder that American exceptionalism has limits. The dollar’s traditional role as a shock absorber began to break down, gold prices surged as investors looked for alternative stores of value, and several major currencies strengthened relative to the dollar. The dollar’s value ultimately rests on trust in US policy and institutions – and that assumption is being questioned.

The US dollar is no longer acting as a ‘shock absorber’

Figure 1: Trade-weighted US dollar performance during each S&P 500 correction of at least 15%, April 2010 to June 2025.

The first concern is fiscal policy. The US continues to spend far more than it raises in tax revenue, running a deficit of roughly 6% of GDP – a recession-like level of borrowing in an economy close to full employment. Even Elon Musk's DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) initiative failed to make a dent. Each year of overspending adds to an already enormous debt pile. Were the US to experience a downturn, this leaves the government with fewer levers to pull.

A second concern is the current account deficit, which compounds the fiscal problem. The US spends more than it earns, importing far more goods and services than it exports. To plug the gap, it must rely on a continued stream of investment from abroad. Much of this capital has flowed into government debt and equities, concentrated in a handful of high-growth AI companies. If enthusiasm for US technology fades, or if investors start worrying about the sustainability of the government’s debt, those inflows could quickly dry up. What once looked like a position of strength now feels like dependence.

Uncertainty around monetary policy credibility adds further pressure. The Federal Reserve has a challenging job balancing the impact of tariffs against a backdrop of weakening employment. Doing this in the face of aggressive political pressure to lower rates only adds to the potential for a mistake. If the Federal Reserve yields to political pressure and cuts rates prematurely, the dollar could lose both its yield advantage and investors’ confidence.

Perhaps even more troubling is a gradual loss of confidence in US institutions. The Trump administration has taken a more adversarial stance towards some historical allies while also trying to assert greater influence over the judicial system – actions that may prompt some foreign investors to look for a new home for their capital.

From a valuation perspective, the dollar also looks vulnerable on a fundamental basis. On our valuation models, it has been expensive relative to other currencies for some time. To some extent, this could be justified by relatively high US interest rates, supported by robust growth, which offered a yield premium over most developed markets. But that foundation is now weakening while the concerns discussed above are intensifying.

Looking beyond the dollar

If the dollar is expensive and vulnerable, where might investors look instead? The problem is that there is still no realistic challenger to the dollar’s position as the global reserve currency. In our view, a better approach is to build a basket of alternative currency exposures that help to mitigate some of the risk that comes with excessive reliance on the dollar.

To name just a few current examples, the Norwegian krone, Australian dollar, and Japanese yen all offer compelling characteristics ranging from fiscal strength and external surpluses to deep undervaluation. The rise in the gold price also reflects a wider search for assets that can preserve value in a world of high debt and political uncertainty.

To be clear, exposure to the greenback is nearly impossible for global investors to avoid altogether. But we think it’s more important than ever to avoid being complacent and to challenge the conventional wisdom that the dollar is the only game in town. While none of the alternatives can individually replace the dollar, they collectively provide a valuable counterweight in a world where the traditional safe haven may no longer be as safe as it appears.

Key Takeaways

  • Safe-haven question: The US dollar’s long-standing role as a ‘shock absorber’ during times of market stress is showing cracks. The ‘Liberation Day’ sell-off was a timely reminder that even American exceptionalism has limits, and the dollar’s defensive reputation can no longer be taken for granted.
  • Mounting headwinds: The dollar’s yield advantage may fade if the US Federal Reserve cuts rates too soon or fiscal pressures lead to financial repression. Rising debt, persistent deficits, and a greater tolerance for inflation also point to a weaker long-term backdrop for the currency.
  • Currency diversification: Investors may benefit from building a balanced basket of alternative currencies to reduce dollar dependence. In our view, the Japanese yen, Norwegian krone, and Australian dollar all offer compelling characteristics ranging from fiscal strength and external surpluses to deep undervaluation.

 

Nicholas Purser is responsible for currency management in the Orbis Global Equity Strategy at Orbis Investments, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article contains general information at a point in time and not personal financial or investment advice. It should not be used as a guide to invest or trade and does not take into account the specific investment objectives or financial situation of any particular person. The Orbis Funds may take a different view depending on facts and circumstances.

For more articles and papers from Orbis, please click here.

 

  •   7 January 2026
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

The currency bet you didn’t know you made

Making sense of record high markets as the world catches fire

Ray Dalio on 2025’s real story, Trump, and what’s next

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The investing rule that explains the next market crash

What if investment success depends less on picking the right assets and more on understanding the decisions of other investors? A principle borrowed from game theory offers a different perspective on markets.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.