Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 124

Meeting the work test for contributions

I’ve had a paradigm shift! Just when I thought I could confidently predict the ATO’s view on meeting the work test to make contributions, they have come back and surprised me!

Let me explain. I have been assisting a client where the ATO wants to charge her excess contributions tax. My client is over the age of 65 and at the time she made the contribution, she had not met the work test. My argument was that as she had not met the work test at the time she made the contribution, the trustee should not have accepted the contribution. However, the ATO has taken the view that as she has an SMSF and is self-employed, she would have known that she would satisfy the work test at a later date in the financial year. I did not see that coming!

The need to be ‘gainfully employed’

The timing of contributions has caused a great deal of confusion for SMSF trustees, members and industry professionals. The superannuation law states that once an SMSF member is aged 65 or over but is less than 75, they can only make superannuation contributions into their SMSF if they are gainfully employed on at least a part time basis during the financial year in which the contributions are made.

The definition of ‘gainfully employed’ under the superannuation law means to be employed or self-employed for gain or reward in any business, trade, profession, vocation, calling, occupation or employment. The concept of gain or reward envisages receipt of remuneration such as a salary or wages, business income, bonuses, commissions, fees or gratuities, in return for personal exertion. It does not include the passive receipt of income such as rent, trust distributions or dividends. Therefore, if a member only receives passive income, they would not meet the gainful employment test. Unpaid work also does not meet the definition of gainful employment.

The term ‘part-time’ means to be gainfully employed for at least 40 hours in a period of not more than 30 consecutive days in a financial year. So if you work 10 hours per week in one month or 10 hours over four days, that would be sufficient.

The ‘paid work’ condition only has to be met once in each financial year you make the contribution, after turning 65. Once you have met it, you do not need to be gainfully employed for the rest of the financial year or need to meet the work test again each time you make a contribution into your SMSF.

Timing difference between public fund and SMSF

Based on the ATO’s interpretation in my client’s case on the work test, it seems to depend on whether you are making contributions into an SMSF or a public superannuation fund and whether you are self employed.

If you are making contributions into an APRA regulated superannuation fund, then you must meet the work test prior to making your first contribution after turning 65. This is because the trustee of the fund will need to be satisfied that you have met the work test in order to allow you to contribute into the fund.

If you plan on making contributions into your SMSF, then it seems that as long as you have met the work test once in the financial year after you turned 65, you can contribute. This is especially important for members who are self employed. If you know that you will be in part-time paid employment at some time during the year, after turning 65, you can make contributions into your SMSF even though you may not have worked part-time at the time you make the contribution. Of course, if you assumed that you will work that year (after turning 65) and then fell ill and therefore were unable to work at all, then the contribution would need to be returned to the member within 30 days of the SMSF trustee becoming aware of the member’s illness.

The ATO’s decision in my client’s case seems to have wider applications. It seems to me that if you have an SMSF, as long as you meet the work test in the financial year that you make a contribution, it is not a contravention; regardless of whether the contribution was made before or after you satisfied the test.

 

Monica Rule is an SMSF specialist and author. Her website is www.monicarule.com.au. This article is for educational purposes and does not consider the needs of any individual.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Tax paid by your SMSF can be returned to your dependants

Are you paying tax by not starting a super pension?

A guide to excess non-concessional super contributions

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Which generation had it toughest?

Each generation believes its economic challenges were uniquely tough - but what does the data say? A closer look reveals a more nuanced, complex story behind the generational hardship debate. 

Maybe it’s time to consider taxing the family home

Australia could unlock smarter investment and greater equity by reforming housing tax concessions. Rethinking exemptions on the family home could benefit most Australians, especially renters and owners of modest homes.

The best way to get rich and retire early

This goes through the different options including shares, property and business ownership and declares a winner, as well as outlining the mindset needed to earn enough to never have to work again.

A perfect storm for housing affordability in Australia

Everyone has a theory as to why housing in Australia is so expensive. There are a lot of different factors at play, from skewed migration patterns to banking trends and housing's status as a national obsession.

Supercharging the ‘4% rule’ to ensure a richer retirement

The creator of the 4% rule for retirement withdrawals, Bill Bengen, has written a new book outlining fresh strategies to outlive your money, including holding fewer stocks in early retirement before increasing allocations.

Simple maths says the AI investment boom ends badly

This AI cycle feels less like a revolution and more like a rerun. Just like fibre in 2000, shale in 2014, and cannabis in 2019, the technology or product is real but the capital cycle will be brutal. Investors beware.

Latest Updates

Weekly Editorial

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 628 with weekend update

Australian investors have been pouring money into US stocks this year, just as they start to underperform the rest of the world. Is this a sign of things to come? This looks at 50 years of data to see what happens next.

  • 11 September 2025
Exchange traded products

Are LICs licked?

LICs are continuing to struggle with large discounts and frustrated investors are wondering whether it’s worth holding onto them. This explains why the next 6-12 months will be make or break for many LICs.

Retirement

We need a better scheme to help superannuation victims

The Compensation Scheme of Last Resort fails families hit by First Guardian and Shield losses, as well as advisers who are being wrongly blamed for the saga. It’s time for a fair, faster, universal super levy solution.

Investment strategies

5 charts every retiree must see…

Retirement can be daunting for Australians facing financial uncertainty. Understand your goals, longevity challenges, inflation impacts, market risks, and components of retirement income with these crucial charts.

Economy

How bread vs rice moulded history

Does a country's staple crop decide elements of its destiny? The second order effects of being a wheat or rice growing country could explain big differences in culture, societal norms and economic development.

Investment strategies

Small caps are catching fire - for good reason

Small caps just crashed the party like John McClane did in the movie, Die Hard - August delivered explosive gains. With valuations at historic lows, long-term investors could be set for a sequel worth watching.

Defensive growth for an age of deglobalisation, debt and disorder

Today’s new world order appears likely to lead to a lower return, higher risk investment environment. But this asset class looks especially well placed to survive, thrive, and deliver attractive returns to investors.

Economy

Will we choose a four-day working week?

The allure of a four-day week reflects a yearning for more balance in our lives. Yet the reliability of studies touting a lift in productivity is questionable and society may not be ready for such a shift anyway.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.