Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 35

Painful transition to FOFA will pay off in the long term

The Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) reforms have overhauled the way financial advisors operate, to the long term benefit of financial advisors and the major banks. FOFA came into effect on 1 July 2013, and aims to reduce conflicts of interest within the financial planning and investment advice industry. The legislation has fundamentally changed the way financial advisors are remunerated for their services. Consequently, some advisors have come under significant pressure, while others have capitalised on opportunities to strengthen their business models and emphasise value propositions. Meanwhile, the major banks are following developments closely, ready to pick up the pieces – as they tend to do when a part of the financial sector is set to disintegrate.

The basics of FOFA

FOFA has introduced a ban on commission payments. Previously, financial advisors would receive a commission on the sale of retail financial products, such as investment schemes and insurance policies, to retail clients. This commission would be paid by the product provider. Thus, retail customers themselves did not have to pay directly for financial advice. Rather, the financial advisor would inform them on a product, sign the clients up and receive a commission from the upstream institution. Essentially, the advisors were part of the upstream cost structure and were incentivised to push through as many products as they could, regardless of a client’s financial situation. The ban on commission payments, along with the introduction of a fiduciary duty, has changed this. Subject to grandfathering on some existing payments, financial advisors now have to receive upfront payments for their services directly from clients, and it is now law that they act in the best interest of clients.

The fundamentals of financial planning and investment advisory operations have not changed. The success of these businesses is still underpinned by the quality of advice and the established relationships between clients and advisors, and between advisors and financial institutions. The FOFA reforms only apply to advisors working with retail clients — that is, clients that are not classified as wholesale or sophisticated investors. What has changed is the remuneration of retail advisors. The model will now largely move towards a salary-based package for advisors. The days of cap-free and trailing commissions are all but over.

Effect of fee-for-service

Financial advisors have had over a year to adjust their platforms. In early 2012, the Federal Government announced that the reforms would be compulsory from July 2013. Many firms implemented the fee-for-service model much earlier (notably NAB, which began implementation in 2008). The performance of advisors that introduced a fee-for-service model before FOFA became mandatory suggests that demand is unlikely to plummet due to the reforms. However, the demographics of the markets for financial advisors are expected to change, and the long-term effects of the legislation on the financial planning and investment advice industry remain unclear.

The reforms create an opportunity for savvy advisors with established reputations. The legislation improves the quality of financial advice because it removes the patent conflict of interest that existed previously. It also attracts clients previously put off by the feeling that a financial advisor was just another salesman. Overall, IBISWorld expects the industry to continue its healthy growth path over the five years through 2018-19.

The changing pay structure is spooking some advisors, who have turned to the big banks for security. The banks have started to consolidate their financial planning businesses by acquiring smaller boutique advisories that depended on the commission structure. The Big Four banks are still able to offer free financial advice as part of their overall value proposition, spreading the related costs across their traditional products. Furthermore, some advisors with strong ties to particular institutions, such as superannuation firms or insurance underwriters, have been able to find refuge with these establishments. The FOFA reforms offer the banks an opportunity to further diversify their businesses and reduce their dependence on mortgage lending.

Although it may be painful, FOFA demands higher professionalism, improves client confidence and presents opportunities for the banking sector and reputable advisors. The cleansing effects of the legislation are expected to outweigh the costs in the long term, especially as the wealth of the general public continues to grow.

 

Andrei Ivanov is Industry Analyst, IBISWorld, and Tim Stephen is Industry Research Manager, IBISWorld. IBISWorld is Australia’s best-known business information corporation. Related industry reports include K6419b Financial Planning and Investment Advice.

 

  •   10 October 2013
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

The state of play in the funds management industry

The dynamics of the Australian superannuation system

Managed funds reign over noisy neighbours, the SMSFs

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Does your will qualify for the discretionary testamentary trust exemption?

Treasury has confirmed the exemption many families were hoping for. But buried in the fine print are two conditions that could leave some wills on the wrong side of the exemption, despite years of careful planning.

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Lithium's latest drop and what it means for ASX investors

Lithium's latest sell-off has punished ASX miners as prices remain hostage to shifting expectations. The key challenge is navigating a market prone to extreme volatility despite a strong case for the long-term demand outlook.

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

Planning

Testamentary trusts have secured the CGT exemption

Treasury’s latest CGT reform draft delivers a win for testamentary trusts and deceased estates, exempting estate-derived gains from the 30% floor. However, questions on death and divorce rollovers remain unresolved. 

Superannuation

How much super should you have?

Average super balances are one of the most misleading benchmarks. They ignore your goals, spending and future needs, creating a false sense of security. Here is how I calculate exactly where I need to be at every decade.

Retirement

Retiring from work is easy, retiring into life is harder

Most people spend decades planning how to retire. Far fewer plan for what comes next. The biggest retirement challenge isn't always financial, and it often catches even the most prepared retirees completely off guard.

Shares

Right asset class, wrong index: the trap in Australian small caps

Most Australian portfolios are concentrated in large caps, with relatively little exposure to smaller companies. But what if the biggest risk isn't the economy, interest rates or valuations? For many, the risk is hidden in plain sight. 

Property

Are these assets the missing piece in Australian portfolios?

Many investors remain concentrated in shares, cash and property. Despite their popularity among institutional investors, real assets remain underrepresented in many SMSF portfolios. Could they be the missing piece?

Investment strategies

The biggest risk that buy-and-hold investors ignore

Investors spend decades learning how to stay invested, yet few have a plan for getting out. When a financial goal has a hard deadline, a worked example shows why a fixed derisking schedule should outrank buy-and-hold discipline.

Investment strategies

How passive investing is driving the decline of active fund alpha

Why have active managers struggled as passive investing has surged? Research suggests that flows into index funds and ETFs are creating structural headwinds, penalising the stock-picking strategies that once generated alpha.  

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.