Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 310

Profit from your principles

Responsible investing is on the rise. According to the Responsible Investment Benchmark Report 2018 Australia, more than half of all professionally managed assets in Australia fall under a responsible investment umbrella.

In years gone by, conventional wisdom was that acting in accordance with ethical principles involved a trade-off against portfolio returns. However, the figures do not bear this out, and present a compelling argument for investing in a socially responsible way.

What is responsible investing?

The Responsible Investment Association Australasia (RIAA) defines responsible investing, also known as ethical investing or socially responsible investing (SRI), as ‘a process that takes into account environmental, social, governance (ESG) and ethical issues in the investment process of research, analysis, selection and monitoring of investments.’

Broad responsible investment is a broad-brush approach where investment managers systematically include ESG factors in traditional financial analysis and investment decision-making.

Core responsible investment goes further. The investment manager employs one or more responsible investment strategies, including screening, sustainability-themed investing, and impact investing and community finance.

For example, the manager might apply investment screens, such as:

  • Negative screens – systematically filtering out specific industries, sectors, or companies, such as those involved in gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, pornography or animal testing.
  • Positive screens – selecting sectors, companies or projects that demonstrate ESG focus that is superior to industry peers.

This category of investing is growing strongly. For example, in 2017, assets under management by Core responsible investment funds in Australia increased by 188% to $186.7 billion.

Fig 1: Responsible investment by approach

Source: Responsible Investment Benchmark Report 2018 Australia (RIAA)

Does responsible investment mean sacrificing performance?

In previous years, there was a belief that investors had to choose between principles and performance, that giving priority to ethical considerations meant trading off financial returns.

The RIAA’s research does not bear this out. The RIAA found that, as at 31 December 2017, Core responsible investment:

  • Australian share funds outperformed the average large cap Australian share funds over three, five and ten-year time horizons.
  • international share funds outperformed large cap international share funds over one- and three-year time horizons and matched the ten-year performance.
  • multi-sector growth funds (balanced funds) outperformed their equivalent mainstream multi-sector growth funds over three, five and ten-year time horizons.

Source: Responsible Investment Benchmark Report 2018 Australia (RIAA). Past performance is not an indicator of future performance.

How do I know I’m really buying a responsible investment?

Investors who want to allocate their funds responsibly need to have confidence that investments are ‘true to label’. In the world of SRI, this can be easier said than done.

Take for example the ‘ethical index series’ of a large global index provider. The methodology of these indices avoids investing in ‘pure play coal companies’. However, major coal producers including BHP and Anglo American are included, on the grounds that they are ‘general mining’ companies rather than ‘coal miners’.

Some ethical investors may be comfortable with this, while for others such exposure would be inconsistent with their principles.

The RIAA runs a 'Responsible Investment Certification Program' which aims to help investors navigate these complexities to find investment options that match their beliefs, principles and personal values.

If an investment product has been certified by the RIAA it means it “has implemented a detailed responsible investment process for all investment decisions, clearly discloses what that process is, has been audited by an external party to verify the investment process, and has met the strict disclosure requirements of the program”.

Responsible ETFs in Australia

BetaShares offers two ethical funds, that can be bought in a single trade on the ASX, BetaShares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF (ASX:ETHI) and BetaShares Australian Sustainability Leaders ETF (ASX:FAIR). Both funds have been certified by RIAA as a ‘Certified Ethical Investment’*, supporting the view you are getting a ‘true to label’ investment.*

ETHI and FAIR employ some of the most stringent ESG screens in the industry. Companies are screened to exclude those with significant exposure to the fossil fuel industry, as well as those engaged in activities/products deemed inconsistent with responsible investment considerations, including gambling, tobacco, armaments, uranium/nuclear energy, destruction of valuable environments, animal cruelty, mandatory detention of asylum seekers, alcohol, and pornography. The funds have attracted significant investor attention since their launch, collectively growing to over $600 million in assets as at 3 June 2019. And as the tables below show, the indices which the ETFs aim to track have performed well too, allowing investors to well and truly 'profit from their principles'.


*ETHI and FAIR have been certified by RIAA according to the strict operational and disclosure practices required under the Responsible Investment Certification Program. See for details.


Richard Montgomery is the Marketing Communications Manager at BetaShares, a sponsor of Cuffelinks. This article is for general information purposes only and does not address the needs of any individual.

The Responsible Investment Certification Program does not constitute financial product advice. Neither the Certification Symbol nor RIAA recommends to any person that any financial product is a suitable investment or that returns are guaranteed. Appropriate professional advice should be sought prior to making an investment decision. RIAA does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence.

For more articles and papers from BetaShares, please click here.



Leave a Comment:



Australian ETFs: end of year reviews 2018

Shorting and pairs trading using Exchange Traded Products

ETFs are the Marvel of listed galaxies, even with star WAR


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates


$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.


Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.