Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 67

Quality over quantity: a lesson of value

There are, broadly speaking, two kinds of stock market investors in this world: those who believe they can beat the market and those who don’t. The latter group of investors tends to buy index-style funds that hold shares in nearly every company in proportion to their index weight to ensure delivery of the market return, net of fees, with little deviation.

But what about the former group of investors? One philosophy which has demonstrated sustainable outperformance of the market over long periods of time is that of ‘value investing’. Under this philosophy, the investor will hold shares in fewer companies which are of relatively higher quality and purchased at relatively lower valuations.

While many subscribe to these ideas, putting them into practice is not a trivial task. One area that many investors grapple with is articulating precisely what constitutes a ‘high quality’ business. One way to think about the quality of a business is to answer the following question: how easy would it be for a competitor to recreate the business? If the answer is ‘very easy’ – as would be the case for, say, a corner store, then the quality of the business is low. On the other hand, if the answer is ‘very difficult, time consuming or costly’ – as is the case for, say, Facebook, then the quality of the business is high.

When thinking about how to answer this question, one can think of three key sources of quality. A business can be qualitatively evaluated for these elements with a check-list type approach. The three sources of quality are: economies of scale, customer captivity and government protection, such as licenses or patents.

Economies of scale relate to the dynamic of bigger businesses exhibiting a cost advantage over smaller businesses. When fixed costs can be spread across a larger quantity of goods and services, average unit costs are lower. Furthermore, bigger businesses can exhibit stronger bargaining power over suppliers and drive more favourable terms than smaller businesses. We are seeing this dynamic all too clearly in the Australian supermarkets space.

Customer captivity relates to the ease with which customers can switch to a competitor. A business that has a large degree of customer captivity is often more successful in pushing through higher prices. There are various forms of customer captivity. These include integrated systems between the business and its customers, as is the case for Visa and Mastercard, as well as customer loyalty programs that effectively increase the cost for customers to switch.

Finally, when a business has privileged access to resources or a patent, this represents an advantage that cannot easily be recreated by competitors. For instance, one of the reasons why BHP is such a world-class business is because it has government-protected rights to mine the natural resources of Australia and other nations. Without these rights, the company’s quality would be severely impaired. Patents on new technology create a similar degree of quality to the extent they are protected by the government.

Value investors will aim to hold portfolios of shares in companies that exhibit many of the elements described above. As long as the investor does not overpay for these businesses initially, they can be reasonably assured of market outperformance over long periods of time. These principles of value investing are worth keeping in mind for both individual investors as well as those looking to evaluate the investment managers of externally-managed funds.

 

Andrew Macken is a Senior Analyst at The Montgomery Fund

 


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

What makes a company attractive?

Learn your knowns and unknowns

Value investing and valuing a business

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.