Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 337

Sale and leasebacks benefit both companies and investors

In the current low interest rate environment, corporate Australia is revisiting their property occupancy strategies to unlock value. For companies that own and occupy their property, a sale and leaseback transaction can be an astute business strategy. At the same time, the sale can provide attractive, long-term assets for funds and their investors.

Company ability to monetise an asset

Given the strong demand from both listed and unlisted property funds for long-term leased properties, together with the historically low cap rates (yields) at which these properties currently trade, it is an ideal time for corporates to monetise their property assets through a sale and lease back transaction.

A sale and leaseback arrangement effectively separates the ‘asset value’ from the ‘asset’s utility value’. A company can crystallise value and redeploy the capital tied up in a low-yielding property back into their business at higher rates of return in a more productive use. This might include acquiring another other business, paying down debt, or undertaking a return of capital to shareholders via a special dividend or share buy-back.

Sale and leaseback transactions have become particularly attractive to private equity firms acquiring ‘property rich’ companies. By carving out the property from the business concurrent with, or post, acquisition, the private equity owner has the potential to unlock a materially higher value for the asset than they paid for it. Often, there is a disconnect between a lower cash flow multiple paid to acquire a business which is property rich and the higher cash flow multiple placed on an asset-light enterprise.

How a company retains control and flexibility

With debt costs at record lows, an easy option for corporates is to utilise debt capital and borrow to assist in funding their business. However, the debt is typically only available for a short period of time (say three to five years) creating rollover risk. It may also come with arduous covenants, and only unlock between 30% and 65% (loan to value ratio) of the value of the property.

Given the low cost of debt, the lease payments under a sale and lease transaction may be more expensive than the interest payments on the debt, but a sale and leaseback can provide greater certainty to the company due to a long-term lease. The company can also secure 100% of the value of its property assets in cash.

For many companies considering a sale and leaseback, the ongoing control and use of an operationally critical property is paramount to the long-term objectives of the business. An appropriately structured sale and leaseback can allow the tenant to retain possession and continued use of the property for the lease term.

Typical sale and leaseback leases are triple net which means the tenant is responsible for outgoings, repairs and maintenance and most capital items. The leases are for between 10 and 20 years, although in some cases may be longer. The company may also negotiate lease extension options giving even longer-term certainty. In some cases, they may include terms for early lease surrender if more flexibility is required, and the new owner is comfortable to take on the risk of reletting or converting the property to an alternate use down the track.

Examples of long-term sales and leasebacks

Charter Hall has been involved in more than $6.5 billion of sale and lease back transactions in the past few years with high quality, creditworthy covenants such as the Federal Government, BP, Telstra, Coca-Cola Amatil, Ingham’s, Bombardier Transport, Virgin Australia, Arnott’s, Bunnings and Woolworths. These transactions span a range of property sectors including office, industrial, social infrastructure, pubs, convenience retail, fuel outlets and large format retail.

In one of Australia’s largest sale and leaseback transactions, in August 2019 Telstra sold down a 49% interest in 37 telco exchanges to a Charter Hall led consortium for $700 million. The deal was struck on a capitalisation rate of 4.4%.

Telstra’s CEO, Andy Penn, said the deal was part of Telstra’s strategy of monetising up to $2 billion of assets to strengthen its balance sheet. Under the terms of the transaction, Telstra retains a 51% controlling interest in the entity that holds the assets and retains operational control of all the exchanges. In return, Telstra signed a long-term triple-net lease with a weighted average lease expiry of 21 years, with multiple options for lease extension to accommodate ongoing business requirements.

Opportunities for investors

More recently, private equity giant KKR, as part of their deal to buy iconic biscuit manufacturer Arnott’s from Campbell Soup Company, immediately on-sold Arnott’s Australian production facilities. Charter Hall’s acquisition, through its unlisted Charter Hall Prime Industrial Fund (CPIF) and the ASX-listed Charter Hall Long WALE REIT (ASX:CLW), of Arnott’s 59,000sqm facility in Huntingwood in Western Sydney for $397.8 million, on a passing yield of 4.5% is one of the largest individual industrial asset sales recorded in Australia.

Arnott’s signed a 32-year triple net lease with multiple 10-year options giving certainty of tenure over their premier Australian production facility, as well as unlocking significant capital to the new business owners.

The 32-year lease and uncapped CPI plus 0.5% annual rent reviews provide an attractive long-term investment with inflation protection to the CPIF and CLW investors.

Companies should consider capitalising on the growing demand from property investors for long-term predictable income returns as part of their overall capital management plan. A well-structured sale and leaseback programme provides access to an alternative source of long-term capital which can enhance the overall capital efficiency and value of their business, and place the asset in the hands of investors seeking long-term income security.

 

Adrian Harrington is Head of Capital and Product Development at Charter Hall, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is for general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

For more articles and papers from Charter Hall (and previously, Folkestone), please click here.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Economic recovery and its impact on commercial real estate

A-REITs offering much-needed income

David Harrison on the hot spots in property

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.

Property

RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.

Shares

4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.

Shares

Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.

Shares

Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.

Superannuation

Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.