Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 86

Set yourself to benefit from compounding

Recently I wrote that a person aged 25 and earning $35,000 a year may accumulate $4 million in superannuation at age 65 just by relying on the employer compulsory contribution.

This resulted a flood of emails asking if I had made a mistake in the calculations as the outcome seemed too good to be true.

There was no mistake – it was just compound interest doing its work. To put it simply, how much you will have at the end of a given period depends on the time the money is invested and the rate you can achieve. If the term is short, the rate matters little, but as time lengthens it matters enormously.

To get an estimate of how much a 25-year-old could expect at age 65 we need to make certain assumptions. They are the rate of growth of salary, inflation, and a reasonable earning rate. In the example, I assumed inflation was 3% per annum, wages growth was 4% per annum, and the rate of return was inflation plus 7% (historically reasonable but perhaps a tad optimistic now). This gives a nominal return of 10% per annum. I also assumed the employer contribution would rise to 12% by 2020.

An important step for understanding the buying power of the $4 million is to convert those future dollars to today’s dollars. If inflation was 3% per annum, $4 million in 40 years would have a value of just $1,212,000 in today’s dollars. Yes, still a hefty sum, but doesn't sound nearly as much as $4 million.

Massive impact of term and earning rate

The big lesson here is the way the rate and the duration of the investment dramatically affect the end balance. Suppose a person invested $1,000 a month towards their retirement. If they started at 25 they would have $6.3 million at age 65 if they could achieve 10% per annum. However, the final sum would be just $2 million if they only achieved 6% per annum.

If a person waited until they were 45 to start the programme, and still managed to invest $1,000 a month they may have $760,000 at 10% and $462,000 at 6%. Because the term is much shorter the lower earning rate does not have such a dramatic effect.

The importance of getting the best return on your superannuation is particularly important now that employer contributions are not going to increase as fast as originally planned.  Recently the media have been focusing on the effect a reduction in the employer contribution would have on their final balance, but it’s small bikkies in the scheme of things. For a person earning $80,000 a year the net employer contribution after the 15% entry tax would be $6,460 at 9.5% of salary and $8,160 at 12% of salary. The difference is just $1700 a year.

Engage with your super early

I regularly receive emails from young people whose superannuation is all in the capital stable or balanced area. This is inappropriate for anybody under 50. To make matters worse the majority of SMSFs have no exposure to international funds at all. Obviously the trustees have never bothered to check out funds like Magellan (Global Fund) and Platinum (International Fund), which have strong track records of delivering good returns.

A major finding of the Cooper Review into superannuation was that 80% of Australians were ‘disengaged with their super’. If you find yourselves in that 80%, my advice to you is to start to get engaged. You've just seen how a small difference in the rate of return or starting earlier can make a huge difference to the amount you will have when you retire.

 

Noel Whittaker is the author of Making Money Made Simple and numerous other books on personal finance. His advice is general in nature and readers should seek their own professional advice before making any financial decisions. His website is www.noelwhittaker.com.au.

 

1 Comments
Ramani
October 31, 2014

That humanity needs to be reminded time and again about compound interest is a telling commentary on our collective ability to ignore the basics. Like gravity, compounding works its impact in an agnostic way - just as Noel points out the merits of compounding when you are a saver, the downside when you are a borrower and allow interest to accumulate is equally relentless. The disengaged, the negligent, the downright careless and the unfortunates fallen on hard times find this to their personal and family cost.

We have successfully transformed our inability into extreme forms of reaction, including pejoratives such as 'usury'.

On the practical side, deposit-takers and lenders have arrogated to themselves the mathematical consequences of compounding: thus a five year compounded deposit boasts of a stellar equivalent simple interest rate achieved, forgetting that each interest instalment has also been deposited till residual maturity. Equally, the interest 'saved' by borrower by increasing the frequency of repayment is often advertised almost as if the lender is doing a favour. It would help to remember that the ultimate saving of interest is achieved by making the principal or duration zero: don't borrow, or repay on the date of borrowing!

Something many find revealing is compound growth is more natural than simple rate of growth. If we accept that something will grow by a set percentage at a defined frequency, it must follow that the new growth will also grow likewise. Simple rate of growth denies further growth to the new offshoot, and is hence artificial. Think of a small plant, and this will dawn on us.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Let’s talk more about compounding and the Rule of 72

A steady road to getting rich

Shaky markets, steady mind

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Maybe it’s time to consider taxing the family home

Australia could unlock smarter investment and greater equity by reforming housing tax concessions. Rethinking exemptions on the family home could benefit most Australians, especially renters and owners of modest homes.

Supercharging the ‘4% rule’ to ensure a richer retirement

The creator of the 4% rule for retirement withdrawals, Bill Bengen, has written a new book outlining fresh strategies to outlive your money, including holding fewer stocks in early retirement before increasing allocations.

Simple maths says the AI investment boom ends badly

This AI cycle feels less like a revolution and more like a rerun. Just like fibre in 2000, shale in 2014, and cannabis in 2019, the technology or product is real but the capital cycle will be brutal. Investors beware.

Why we should follow Canada and cut migration

An explosion in low-skilled migration to Australia has depressed wages, killed productivity, and cut rental vacancy rates to near decades-lows. It’s time both sides of politics addressed the issue.

Are franking credits worth pursuing?

Are franking credits factored into share prices? The data suggests they're probably not, and there are certain types of stocks that offer higher franking credits as well as the prospect for higher returns.

Are LICs licked?

LICs are continuing to struggle with large discounts and frustrated investors are wondering whether it’s worth holding onto them. This explains why the next 6-12 months will be make or break for many LICs.

Latest Updates

A nation of landlords and fund managers

Super and housing dwarf every other asset class in Australia, and they’ve both become too big to fail. Can they continue to grow at current rates, and if so, what are the implications for the economy, work and markets?

Economy

The hidden property empire of Australia’s politicians

With rising home prices and falling affordability, political leaders preach reform. But asset disclosures show many are heavily invested in property - raising doubts about whose interests housing policy really protects.

Retirement

Retiring debt-free may not be the best strategy

Retiring with debt may have advantages. Maintaining a mortgage on the family home can provide a line of credit in retirement for flexibility, extra income, and a DIY reverse mortgage strategy.

Shares

Why the ASX is losing Its best companies

The ASX is shrinking not by accident, but by design. A governance model that rewards detachment over ownership is driving capital into private hands and weakening public markets.

Investment strategies

3 reasons the party in big tech stocks may be over

The AI boom has sparked investor euphoria, but under the surface, US big tech is showing cracks - slowing growth, surging capex, and fading dominance signal it's time to question conventional tech optimism.

Investment strategies

Resilience is the new alpha

Trade is now a strategic weapon, reshaping the investment landscape. In this environment, resilient companies - those capable of absorbing shocks and defending margins - are best positioned to outperform.

Shares

The DNA of long-term compounding machines

The next generation of wealth creation is likely to emerge from founder influenced firms that combine scalable models with long-term alignment. Four signs can alert investors to these companies before the crowds.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.