Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 514

Seven lessons on how investors should prepare for a recession

You know that scene. The one where the hero is dying of thirst, crawling on their hands and knees across the scorching desert sand. They spot an oasis on the horizon … with a life-giving water hole. They keep crawling, but the oasis never gets any closer.

It’s a mirage.

Well, that’s what it’s felt like with a US recession this cycle. Economists have been calling it for ages, but like the oasis it never seems to arrive. And, of course, like a mirage, it still may never arrive.

But consensus from economists puts a recession at a 65% probability (Bloomberg) over the next year. That’s as close to a sure thing as economists would ever call. Investors need to be prepared for the mirage to suddenly become material.

So now is a good time to look at what investors should expect if a recession does arrive in the next year in the US.

What, if anything, should share market investors do about it?

Below, we look at seven ‘truths’ and insights for investors, including who will be to blame for a recession, the prospects of timing the bottom, and how we are positioning our own portfolios for a possible US economic downturn.

1. It’s the Fed who will likely cause a recession

Since World War 2, on average, there has been about one U.S. recession every 6-7 years (12 in total). On average they have lasted a little less than a year (10 months).

What causes them?

Well, the ultimate cause (if there is ultimately just one) is hotly debated amongst economists (though I’m not sure big crowds are turning up for the debate!), but the proximate cause is usually a central bank increasing interest rates to cool an overheating economy.

US recessions tend to line up nicely around the end of the US Federal Reserve’s rate hiking cycles. The key exception in modern times is the 1995 rate cycle, which resulted in a soft landing and no recession.

2. Small caps get hurt the most in recessions

So, when recession has hit in the past, what has been the share market fallout?

Below, we show the drawdowns (peak to trough falls) for both US large caps (S&P500) and US small caps (Russell 2000).

The share market hit


Source: Factset.

The median drawdown for large caps has been -24% and for small caps -36% (though the available data doesn’t go back as far for small caps).

What you can also see is that outside the 2001 dot com bursting episode and the associated recession, small caps have fallen farthest. This is generally expected in a recession because:

  • Investor generally seek the greater liquidity and higher and more certain dividends of more mature large caps; and
  • Small caps tend to be less diversified businesses with on average weaker balance sheets than large caps.

3. Small and big cap stocks have already recorded recession-like falls

How does this stack up to the current maximum drawdowns experienced so far for US large and small caps?

At writing, large caps have fallen -25% to their lows in October 2022, while small caps have fallen -32% to their lows in June 2022 (both since have partially rebounded).

So, while a recession has not occurred this cycle in the US (at least so far), during the most recent sell off starting in 2021/2022, both US large and small caps have already fallen by a similar amount to their recession averages.

This gives some hope that even if a recession does eventuate, the downside may be more limited from here.

4. Stocks surge back after recession falls

The other good news is that even if a recession does eventuate, the subsequent returns from the associated market lows over the next 6-12 months tend to be very healthy.

Below we show the average returns in both US large and small caps in the 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post their recessionary lows.

The share market recovery from recessions


Source: Factset

While, as mentioned, small caps tend to fall farthest, they also tend to recover the strongest on the other side. In fact, the average six-month returns for US small caps are over 50% … and a whopping 85% over 12 months.

As a small-cap manager this is one of the reasons we must be prepared for what is usually a very sharp share market recovery on the other side, should a recession eventuate.

5. Trying to time the bottom? It’s a fool’s errand

The natural question to then ask is: if a US recession looks quite likely and US share markets tend to fall heavily in a recession, shouldn’t I just sell out now and buy back in when it looks like the market is staging what is usually a big recovery on the other side?

While superficially this may seem appealing (and believe me if it were possible, we would certainly do it), it is highly unlikely to be consistently and successfully achievable by an investor for two key reasons:

Firstly, a recession is not assured.

While, as we noted above, the consensus probability of a recession in the next year according to Bloomberg is 65%, of the 60 economic forecasters surveyed, their probabilities currently range from 30% to 100%.

Bottom line, a recession is no sure thing.

Take, for example, the chart below which shows the S&P500 return outcomes over the next 12 months after the last Federal Reserve hike depending on whether no recession, a mild recession or a severe recession occurred.

Why market timing around recessions is a fool’s errand


Source: Factset

As you can see, if no recession does eventuate then history suggests it is ‘off to the races’ for the share market.

That’s not something you’d want to miss if you sold out of the market preparing for a recession. This is particularly relevant now as commentators debate whether we have already seen the last rate hike this business cycle.

Secondly, timing market bottoms during a recession is virtually impossible.

History suggests that if a recession does eventuate, out of the 12 US recessions since World War 2, the share market has never bottomed before the recession has started.

When has it tended to bottom in these recessionary periods?

With the exception of the 2001 dot com crash, where the U.S. share market bottomed after the end of the associated recession, it has always bottomed after the recession start, but before the recession end.

On average, in fact, if we remove the 2001 dot com crash, of the 11 other post-WW2 recessions, the share market has bottomed on average 47% (or almost exactly half) of the way through the recession.

But before those recession absolutists think of using that as a market timing tool, the range in those 11 recessions has been a bottom as early as 15% of the way through the recession, to as late as 79% of the way through.

Given history suggests the market recovery can start at wildly different points during the recession, and the recovery itself, as highlighted earlier, is generally very swift, the odds of getting it wrong by trying to market time are high.

So, staying largely invested seems to us to be the most sensible course of action.

But are there any types of areas of the market investors could benefit from skewing to given a heightened recession probability?

6. Some sectors will lead a recession recovery

Enter the chart below. It shows historically which US sectors have performed the best 3, 6 and 12 months after a recession has started.

Where to invest instead


Source: Factset

What you can see is it tends to be the most resilient, less macroeconomically sensitive consumer staples and healthcare sectors that fare the best, holding their ground.

This makes sense because, while consumer spending pulls back in a recession, they tend to pull back less on things like groceries or medical costs.

By the 12-month mark, returns in most sectors tend to be positive ,with more cyclical sectors such as materials and consumer discretionary joining in and helping lead the rally as the market looks forward to the economic recovery ahead.

Again, this makes sense. Usually by this stage the recession is over or nearing its end and forward-looking share markets seek out those businesses that will benefit from a recovery in demand which tends to boost commodity prices and discretionary expenditure.

7. We are cautious, but not overly so

In sum, at Ophir, we still remain incrementally cautiously positioned in our funds given heightened recession risks, but not overly so.

We are remaining largely invested, with only slightly higher-than-usual levels of cash.

Most importantly, though, our largest positions are in those companies that we believe have strong growth prospects, but where that growth is less reliant on strong economic growth.

Usually, that is because the company’s goods or services are seen as more of a necessity by their customers, or they have unique attributes versus their competitors which is allowing it take market share, or both.

An example of this in our Australian equity funds is AUB Group, one of Australia’s leading insurance brokers to businesses. It operates in an industry that has proved itself resilient to economic contractions in the past as businesses seek to hold on to their policies in a heightened risk environment.

Hopefully this article has shed some more light on when and if a recession might occur near term and some lessons from history on what to expect if it does. And, perhaps most importantly, how we are thinking about portfolio positioning as a result.

 

Andrew Mitchell is Director and Senior Portfolio Manager at Ophir Asset Management, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor. 

Read more articles and papers from Ophir here.

 

  •   21 June 2023
  • 9
  •      
  •   
9 Comments
Beezle
June 22, 2023

The greys in the color coding on you graph are too similar. The swatch sizes are too small.

Carl
June 25, 2023

Agree 100%. Surely a better range of swatches and sizes could be utilised in the graphs- dots, dashes, stars etc.
This applies to many of the graphs in Firstlinks, otherwise an excellent newsletter.

David
June 26, 2023

Yes, the problem is not so much the bars themselves, but the swatches explaining which colour is what category - too small to get a clear view of the colour. It's an issue with whatever the software is that the charts were drawn up on - and it might look fine in first generation upon the author's screen, but here in a rendered, possibly shrunk graphic, it's not so clear.

Also, the explanation that they go left to right is fine if you read across columns, but my first instinct is to read down a column, as it's a column - not immediately across to the next column.

Better charting software would help. Whatever program spat this graph out seems to be a bit in the dark ages from a usability / understandability point of view. I'm sure there are better options available.



Paul Rider
June 23, 2023

Andrew, great article. The older I get, the less certain I am of the accuracy of my own views and those of others. Especially when it comes to forecasting the future. Not sure if this is me getting sillier or wiser.

Andrew Mitchell
June 26, 2023

It's probably wiser Paul. There's that great Aristotle quote, "The more you know, the more you realize you don't know." At least continuous learning helps protect us against overconfidence!

MichaelP
June 24, 2023

Excellent write up. tqvm. I will print and keep it.

Andrew Mitchell
June 26, 2023

Thanks Michael. I find its always helpful to have some stats from past episodes to give some sense of expectations for the future.

Andrew Mitchell
June 26, 2023

Thanks for the feedback Beezle and Paul - we'll take on board. If it helps in the last chart the order of the legend relates to the bars in a left to right, top to bottom fashion i.e. Materials is first and Real Estate is last.

GFB
June 28, 2023

Just to balance out the comments a bit, I found the charts quite easy to read

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Best investments to own during a recession

Don't be fooled: a recessionary hit is coming

Bear markets don't go paw-in-paw with recessions

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

What if Australia’s golden age of dividends is ending? Rather than overhaul your portfolio, it may be worth considering where new capital can work harder. I discuss four income strategies and the trade-offs behind each.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The ageing ‘crisis’ has not and will not happen

Rising age dependency is frequently treated as a warning sign for economies. But when actual workforce participation is examined, a strikingly different picture emerges about ageing, productivity and economic sustainability.

Retirement

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Shares

Four charts that expose market concentration risk

Investors have recently been rewarded for backing market leaders, but history suggests this eventually comes at a cost. Now may be the time to review whether your portfolio is carrying unintended risks beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The case for gearing beyond property

Most Australians gear into property but ignore shares. That may be a mistake. Used carefully, geared equity strategies can enhance long-term returns, reduce cash tied up in growth assets and support retirement income goals.

Economy

Australia's $1 trillion debt pile

The headlines exclaiming that Australian government debt has hit A$1 trillion and US government debt has hit $40 trillion has turned heads, but how serious are they really? Will Australia's mix of debt create challenges?

Economy

Has 100 years of growth made us any happier?

For decades, GDP has been the benchmark for economic success, but has it made us materially happier? If happiness does not rise in lockstep with prosperity, are we overlooking what constitutes a successful society?

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.