Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 258

SMSFs allocating to managed funds and global

Three recent reports on asset allocation confirm a move by SMSFs and other investors into global equities at the expense of Australian companies. It is no doubt driven by the better performance of the S&P500 versus the S&P/ASX300, the surge in technology opportunities offshore and the struggles of previous favourites, the banks and Telstra.

The official statistics on the asset allocation of SMSFs as recorded by the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) from tax returns are flawed, as we have written about several times. Other data sources such as the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) and market participants provide a more complete picture.

The managed fund industry

The latest ABS data for 31 March 2018 shows the Australian managed fund industry held $3.4 trillion, up $15 billion in the quarter. So much for the claims this is a struggling industry. The strongest increase by investment type was overseas assets, a rise of $21 billion, as shown below. Domestic shares fell by $18 billion.

Source: 5565.0 ABS Managed Funds, Australia, March 2018

SMSF investments move to managed funds

The just-released 2018 Vanguard/Investment Trends Self-Managed Super Fund Reports show a time series since 2012 in investment patterns. The most obvious movement is the growth of managed investments, which include ETFs and LICs, at the expense of direct shares. While SMSF trustees are making their own investment decisions, this should not be confused with making their own stock selections. The share of managed investments has doubled from 11% to 22% in six years. The latest BetaShares Australian ETF Review shows inflows into international equities of $273 million in May 2018, with this asset class first for inflows in every month of 2018 so far.

Source: Vanguard/Investment Trends Self-Managed Super Fund Reports, June 2018

SMSF asset allocation

This week, SuperConcepts also released its latest Investment Patterns Survey for March 2018. This is far more up-to-date than the ATO data because it uses SMSF data from funds administered by SuperConcepts, rather than relying on the much-delayed lodgement of tax returns.

The data needs the qualification that SuperConcepts is part of AMP and has a higher proportion of advised clients than most SMSF administrators, and advisers tend to use the functionality of platforms and managed funds. Nevertheless, the change in asset allocation also shows a greater use of international equities over time, up from 12.9% to 14.2% in a year.

A further break-up of the international shares component over the last year shows the steady rise of ETFs and managed funds, and a small rise in SMSFs going directly into foreign stock exchanges.

SMSF international shares components

The balanced options of institutional superannuation funds have long allocated around 20% of their portfolios to global equities, and SMSFs have traditionally lagged far behind. In the last five years, SMSFs have started to catch up, and with the Australian index still dominated by some big companies without compelling growth prospects, it's a trend that will continue.

 

Graham Hand is Managing Editor of Cuffelinks.

 

  •   14 June 2018
  • 2
  •      
  •   
2 Comments
Peter C
June 18, 2018

For the past few years I have invested in the indexed option of my industry super fund.

The international share component has ranged from 30% to 38% during this period (it is 38% now). The increase is mainly because of the natural growth and not because of a switch.

The benefit for me is, I don't have to think about it and don't start investing overseas after the prices of stocks have already increased, I've been in there for a while.

Also, because I used the indexed option the fees are significantly lower than a regular balanced option.

There is still 30% of the portfolio allocated to cash and fixed interest, so I do have a balance between growth and income assets.

SMSF Trustee
June 19, 2018

It would be good to see the ranges for these, if they were available. I'm with Super Organised so my allocation can be validly compared with their data. But my allocation is quite different, so I'd love to see if I'm at the extreme of any ranges.

For example, I've got 7% in what they call "other". I'd guess that the average of 0.7% is made up of lots of funds with zero and a small proportion with significant allocations. Is 7% a large allocation, the average of the non-zeros, or a whimpish allocation from among those who go into that space?

It's great to see this data and I appreciate your comment about the difference between having an SMSF to pick stocks versus having one to hold the managed funds of your choice. I have less than 10% of my fund in direct shares (and that's been reducing over the last year or two). The vast majority is in 25 different managed funds offered by 20 different fund managers.

Great diversification, competitive fee structure, no one else to blame but me for the results - that's why I'm there.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

SMSF asset allocation changes unexpected

Let’s debunk this myth about SMSFs and global shares

SMSFs drop the ball on risk in asset allocation

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.