Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 117

SMSFs and house and land packages

Property investment is gradually becoming more popular with SMSF investors, and I am often asked whether SMSFs can purchase house and land packages. Not only would the SMSF hopefully achieve some long term capital gain, it would also be entitled to claim some depreciation on the new asset as it ages. I always clarify first whether my clients want to purchase a house and land package or purchase a vacant block of land and then build a house on it. What is the difference? It can make a huge difference in the SMSF world, especially when there are borrowings involved.

Purchase as a single acquirable asset

An SMSF can borrow money to purchase a house and land package as long as it is purchased together in the one transaction as a single acquirable asset where the asset is identified up front as vacant land with a completed house on it.

But if an SMSF purchased a block of land with borrowings and then later built a house on the land, this would not be allowed under the limited recourse borrowing arrangement (LRBA). The superannuation law does not allow the single acquirable asset, in this case the block of land, to be improved (by building a house on it) while the loan remains outstanding. There is a very good reason for this.

The borrowing rule is referred to as a limited recourse borrowing arrangement. It means the lender’s rights, on any default on the borrowing by the SMSF, are limited to the single asset acquired under the arrangement. This means, the lender does not have any claim over any of the SMSF’s other assets. The borrowing is quarantined to the single acquirable asset. The law is designed to protect the remaining assets within the SMSF in the event of its default.

So, if an SMSF borrows to purchase a block of land and later builds a house on the land, and then due to some unfortunate financial circumstances cannot repay the loan, the lender will take possession of the asset – which is now a property consisting of a house and land. The money that the SMSF spent building the house on the vacant land is lost as it cannot be recovered from the lender. To make matters worse, the SMSF has also contravened the LRBA and would be in trouble with the Tax Office.

Make sure the SMSF complies

The trustees of the SMSF must ensure that:

  • they identify up front that the single acquirable asset is the land with a completed house on it
  • the lender’s security on the borrowing is at all times over the land and the completed house
  • the LRBA with the lender allows for multiple draw-downs for the deposit, progress payments and the final payment at settlement.

House and land packages can offer investment opportunities for SMSFs, but if they don’t comply with the law, the investment could end up being a costly mistake.

 

Monica Rule is an SMSF Specialist Adviser and the author of ‘SMSFs and Properties’. See www.monicarule.com.au. This article is for general education purposes only and does not consider the personal circumstances of any investor.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Heed my problems borrowing in my SMSF

Oh dear, not another glitch with borrowing in SMSFs

Watch SMSF borrowing rules for separate assets

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.