Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 620

Study supports what many suspected about passive investing

The growth of passive investing has stimulated academic and policy interest in how it affects asset prices and the real economy.

Hao Jiang, Dimitri Vayanos, and Lu Zheng, authors of the March 2025 paper “Passive Investing and the Rise of Mega-Firms,” set out to understand how the increasing shift from active to passive investing influences asset prices, particularly the prices of the largest firms in the market.

They developed a theoretical model showing how the rise of passive investing should affect prices in market equilibrium. They also tested some of the predictions of the model in the data, by analyzing the effects of capital flows into passive funds—such as index funds and exchange-traded funds—on the stock prices and volatility of large-cap companies. Their data sample took the S&P 500 and flows into index mutual funds and index ETFs tracking it. It covered the period from 1996 to 2020.

Before digging into their findings, we need to discuss two key points. First, research (see here and here) has found that active institutional investors (such as mutual funds), in aggregate, underweight large stocks. Second, the investors who then overweight these large stocks are active retail “noise traders”—investors who make decisions to buy or sell based on factors they believe to be helpful but in reality will give them no better returns than random choices. The idea of a noise trader comes from the belief that price action has “noise” that is unrelated to the signal of fundamental analysis about a security’s value.

Their key findings:

  • Disproportionate Price Increases for Large Firms: Their theoretical model shows that inflows into passive funds disproportionately raise the stock prices of the largest companies in the economy (reducing their financing costs), especially those that are already overvalued by the market in the sense of experiencing high demand by noise traders.
  • Wide Market Impact: These price effects are significant enough to lift the overall market, even if the inflows are simply due to investors reallocating from active to passive strategies, rather than new money entering the market.
  • Increased Idiosyncratic Volatility: The authors observed that passive flows create additional idiosyncratic (firm-specific) volatility for large firms. This increased volatility discourages active institutional investors from correcting mispricing caused by passive flows, allowing price distortions to persist.
  • Empirical Evidence From the S&P 500: Consistent with their theoretical model, the largest firms in the S&P 500 experienced the highest returns and the greatest increases in volatility after passive fund inflows into the index. Moreover, consistent with households investing at the beginning of each month a fraction of their monthly paychecks in passive funds through their retirement plans, the largest stocks outperform the index in the first week of each month.

The authors explain the intuition for their results through a feedback loop mechanism. They use a stylized example of a large firm that is in such high demand by noise traders that active funds short-sell it in equilibrium:

“A switch by some investors from active to passive generates additional demand for the firm because passive funds hold the firm with its weight in the market index while active funds hold it with negative weight. Active investors can accommodate the additional demand by scaling up their short position. This renders them, however, more exposed to the firm’s idiosyncratic risk, which is non-negligible because the firm is large. The firm’s stock price must then rise to induce active funds to take on the additional risk. Crucially, because the stock price rises, the stock’s idiosyncratic price movements become larger in absolute terms. This gives rise to an amplification loop: The short position of active funds becomes even riskier, causing the stock’s price to rise even further, and the stock’s idiosyncratic price movements to become even larger. The amplification loop explains why passive flows have their largest effects on large firms in high demand by noise traders.”

Their findings led the authors to conclude:

“Our theory implies that passive investing reduces primarily the financing costs of the largest firms in the economy and makes the size distribution of firms more skewed.”

Key takeaways for investors

  • Passive Flows Can Distort Prices: Investors should be aware that the mechanics of passive investing can drive up the prices of the largest index constituents, sometimes beyond what fundamentals justify.
  • Volatility Risks: The increased idiosyncratic volatility in mega-cap stocks may present both risks and opportunities for investors, particularly those employing active or contrarian strategies.
  • Market Concentration: The rise of mega-firms, fueled by passive flows, can lead to greater market concentration, which may have implications for portfolio diversification and systemic risk.
  • Active vs. Passive Dynamics: While passive investing offers low fees and broad market exposure, its growing dominance can create feedback loops that institutional investors may exploit.

Shaping the market

The paper highlights a crucial dynamic in today’s markets: The surge in passive investing doesn’t just mirror the market—it shapes it, often amplifying the rise of the largest firms and creating new risks and opportunities. For investors, understanding these effects is essential. While passive strategies remain a powerful tool for long-term wealth building, awareness of their broader market impact can help investors make more informed decisions about diversification and risk management.

Postscript

Jiang, Vayanos, and Zheng showed that flows to passive funds have led to a rise in the valuations of the largest stocks more than is justified by fundamentals and lowered their financing costs, raising the question: Could that lead to misallocation of capital?

 

Larry Swedroe is a freelance writer and author. The views expressed here are the author’s. For informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as specific investment, accounting, legal, or tax advice. The author does not own shares in any of the securities mentioned in this article.

 

5 Comments
Steve
July 20, 2025

Won't be long before the Fed Govt will be collecting zillions in CGT revenue from CBA shareholders pass on to the next life.

Johns
July 18, 2025

Passive funds by definition are just following what others are doing completely blind.

While ever the market is dominated by active investors, the passive investors are getting a free ride because they are getting the benefit of the active investors research without paying for it

But there will become a situation where there are too many followers and too few leaders. At that point it becomes the blind leading the blind

James
July 18, 2025

The reason for the growth of passive investing is the underperformance of active investment funds verses their index in the large majority of cases (see the S&P SPIVA Report). Passive investors are simply seeking a better, less volatile return than active strategies. All investments have collateral implications, including active investments.
Does Mr Swedroe think that investors should lower their returns and increase the volatility of their portfolios for the privilege of investing in active funds and thereby paying the salaries and bonuses of underperforming active fund managers?

S2H
July 19, 2025

Larry Swedroe is Booglehead and wrote a book called the Incredible Shrinking Alpha, so he would agree with your sentiment that passive beats active as an individual investor. But that doesn't mean it isn't distorting the market and it doesn't create opportunities for sophisticated quant investors. But as an individual investor should you care? Not if you accept the principle that it is very difficult to pick an active manager who will consistently outperform an index and your goal is to maximise your return.

Steve
July 17, 2025

Still not convinced. The authors use of words like "implied" and "theory" suggest the conclusions are not as solid as first appears, it is just how they explain the observations. They acknowledge that active funds underweight the larger firms; active funds are still very large. Also how does this allow for differences between the larger firms - in Australia BHP has way underperformed CBA - passive funds don't discriminate, just apply the funds at the existing status quo. And that's if its a cap weighted fund. Other funds which are becoming more popular such as equal weight or quality focused have underweight positions in the largest stocks. I suspect CBA itself is a bit of a one-off in that many mum & dad shareholders got their shares many years ago and will "never" sell as it has been such a good investment. Not many companies have this kind of legacy which tips the demand/supply balance (less supply due to many long term holders). Ironically a good run up in share price makes selling harder as you may get a nice capital gains tax bill. Finally the run up in CBA has only really been the last few years - as you say, maybe foreign investors looking to hedge out of US investments might be the primary factor here? One other observation - it is stated that active firms are (in total) underweight the largest firms. This suggests they have therefore underperformed the index, presuming the larger firms that grow the most are the ones driving the index.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Clime time: Tailwinds for asset prices in 2024 and beyond

Why starting points matter

11 lessons from my lousy $50K profit on Afterpay

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Which generation had it toughest?

Each generation believes its economic challenges were uniquely tough - but what does the data say? A closer look reveals a more nuanced, complex story behind the generational hardship debate. 

Raising the GST to 15%

Treasurer Jim Chalmers aims to tackle tax reform but faces challenges. Previous reviews struggled due to political sensitivities, highlighting the need for comprehensive and politically feasible change.

100 Aussies: seven charts on who earns, pays, and owns

The Labor government is talking up tax reform to lift Australia’s ailing economic growth. Before any changes are made, it’s important to know who pays tax, who owns assets, and how much people have in their super for retirement.

The best way to get rich and retire early

This goes through the different options including shares, property and business ownership and declares a winner, as well as outlining the mindset needed to earn enough to never have to work again.

A perfect storm for housing affordability in Australia

Everyone has a theory as to why housing in Australia is so expensive. There are a lot of different factors at play, from skewed migration patterns to banking trends and housing's status as a national obsession.

Chinese steel - building a Sydney Harbour Bridge every 10 minutes

China's steel production, equivalent to building one Sydney Harbour Bridge every 10 minutes, has driven Australia's economic growth. With China's slowdown, what does this mean for Australia's economy and investments?

Latest Updates

Retirement

Supercharging the ‘4% rule’ to ensure a richer retirement

The creator of the 4% rule for retirement withdrawals, Bill Bengen, has written a new book outlining fresh strategies to outlive your money, including holding fewer stocks in early retirement before increasing allocations.

Shares

Are franking credits worth pursuing?

Are franking credits factored into share prices? The data suggests they're probably not, and there are certain types of stocks that offer higher franking credits as well as the prospect for higher returns.

Retirement

Inflation cruels a comfortable retirement

ASFA’s latest estimates reveal that home-owning couples need at least $690,000 in super for a ‘comfortable’ retirement, yet only around 30% of people meet these thresholds, and the shortfall may deepen.

Australia’s sleepwalk into a damaged society

The role of family and community as foundations of a healthy society have been allowed to weaken. This has brought about Australia's spiritual decline and a thirst for dopamine that explains our high debt levels.

Investment strategies

The simplicity of this investing method hides its power

Despite the perception that successful investors nimbly navigate each zig and zag in the market, the evidence suggests otherwise. This approach can help an investor avoid self-harming their returns.

Investment strategies

Four ways that global investors are reshaping their US exposure

It wasn't long ago that investors were asking if US exceptionalism could continue. They now appear to be diversifying away from dollar assets and shifting to a more active US equity allocation.

Investment strategies

The case for high yield bonds

This is a primer on high yield bonds - their risk and returns compared to investment grade securities, diversification benefits, and strategies for selecting high yield investments for enhanced portfolio yields.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.