Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 434

Why starting points matter

It’s why millions of dollars are spent on Grand Prix qualifying cars and house prices are higher near good schools. The better your starting point, the more likely you are to succeed.

Long-term investing is no different. The lower the starting price of an investment, the better it is likely to do, all else being equal. At its heart, a company’s stock price is made up of not just of what its assets, ideas and people are currently worth, but also the profits the market expects it to generate in the future.

Is the value already in the price?

The higher the valuation, the more of those future earnings are already included in the price and the better the company has to do just to meet those inflated expectations, let alone surpass them. In addition, the higher investors’ expectations, the greater the number of possible scenarios wherein the company disappoints the market. Conversely, the lower the starting price, the less the company has to do to beat low expectations.

When it comes to long-term investment returns, your starting point matters

The chart above demonstrates this. It plots the average cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings (CAPE) ratio for the US market over the past 140 years. The CAPE ratio is calculated in a similar way to the standard price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio, but instead of dividing a company’s stock price by one year’s worth of earnings, it uses the average earnings figure for the past 10 years (adjusted for inflation) to smooth out the impact of economic cycles.

Investors tend to use the CAPE ratio as a barometer for how expensive or cheap a market is. A high CAPE ratio tends to indicate that the market is expensive, with the long-term average for the US market somewhere around 17 times.

As you can see, US stockmarkets in aggregate have seldom traded above 30 times. In other words, there have been few times in the past 140 years when investors were willing to pay for more than 30 years’ worth of average earnings upfront and, when they have, the average real return over the following 10 years has been underwhelming, to say the least.

Markets looking expensive in aggregate is not just a US phenomenon. A similar case can be made for the broader FTSE World Index, albeit over a shorter time frame. Over the past 30 years, when the median stock in the FTSE World Index has traded at a starting P/E ratio above 30 times, investors have never made a positive real return over the following four years. At the end of October 2021, the median stock in the FTSE World Index traded close to 30 times.

What does that mean for investors today?

Judging from the chart above, the prospect of stellar returns at an aggregate level over the next few years looks modest at best. If one looks below the headline level, at the individual stocks that make up the market, however, much of the increase in recent years has been driven by a handful of expensive stocks that have become extremely expensive, rather than a groundswell of growth that has pushed up the whole market.

Among those companies that have been left behind, there is a great deal of opportunity to be found, even in a market that is as expensive as the US.

One such example is AES, an independent power producer listed in the US, and a stock held by the Orbis Global Equity Fund. A popular theme for many investors at the moment is the energy transition space, and companies positioned to benefit have been rapidly and, in some cases, extremely bid up. As such, it’s been hard for many investors to find good value in this area. In our view, AES is a rare exception, given it currently trades at around 15 times forward earnings, significantly lower than its peers such as NextEra Energy, which, despite similar levels of earnings growth, trades at more than 30 times forward earnings.

Part of the reason this discount exists is AES’s history and, in particular, its rapid, early expansion. Founded in 1981 as an energy consulting firm, it soon moved into energy generation. By 1988 it had become the largest independent power producer in the US and by 2002 was operating in 29 countries. But, while its share price rose dramatically during these years, it also took on considerable foreign exchange risk, overpaid for assets and consistently missed estimates.

Since 2012, however, the firm has been under new management and overseen a fairly dramatic transformation. While, at a headline level, the firm still does most of the same things, where and how they do them has been significantly improved. Not only has its foreign exchange exposure been dramatically reduced by both its shrunken global footprint and the fact that now around 85% of revenues are denominated in US dollars, but more importantly it has become a leader in green power.

At first glance, AES might not appear very ‘green’ given currently around 25% of the company’s total electricity production is from coal. But, the remainder is derived from renewables and natural gas, and AES is aggressively moving away from coal. Indeed, AES expects coal to account for less than 10% of its total electricity generation in 2025. In addition to its core unit, AES also owns an energy storage joint venture with Siemens called Fluence, currently the second largest energy storage provider globally – second only to Tesla. Management expects Fluence revenue to grow from $100m in 2019 to around $3bn by 2025, with the potential of real blue-sky upside. More recently, Fluence was listed separately, making it one of the largest pure-play energy storage companies in the world. On top of that, late last year, AES announced a 10-year strategic partnership with Google, which we believe, should help to expand its renewable energy project pipeline.

There are, of course, risks to the thesis. AES does have a history of overpromising and underdelivering, albeit under previous management. Then there is the fact that increased competition within the renewables space would put downward pressure on the economics of selling power. And, there does remain some forex risk, especially as not all of its assets are in politically stable jurisdictions. However, we believe these risks have been priced in.

The market overlooks some sectors

And, AES is not alone. There are many other examples, all over the globe from technology to healthcare, from banks to logistics, of companies that are being overlooked by a market focused on a small subset of existing winners.

As bottom-up stock pickers, we are able to search underneath the uncomfortable heights of the headline indices to find exciting opportunities at compelling valuations. By focusing on the starting point and the price we pay, we think this increases the likelihood that we will be successful over the long-term.

 

Shane Woldendorp, Investment Specialist, Orbis Investments, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This report contains general information only and not personal financial or investment advice. It does not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation or individual needs of any particular person.

For more articles and papers from Orbis, please click here.

 

6 Comments
C ( the other one)
November 21, 2021

Natural gas is not considered very, ‘green’ either.

Alex
November 18, 2021

We have enjoyed a golden era for investing in the last 10 years but hard to see this repeating ... and yet super funds still assume healthy returns in their retirement planning calculators.

Warren Bird
November 18, 2021

Alex, every super fund has adjusted the plan returns down over the past several years. They're not as stupid as your throwaway remark implies. Every super fund board is continually assessing whether to keep plan returns but take more risk to achieve them or adjust the expected returns. Some sort of health check process is built into fund governance processes.

David M
November 21, 2021

Gee Warren, Alex makes a fair point. Tough morning? Stated objective returns and tools for members like planning calculators are what guide & inform Mum & Dad. Too many super funds provide poor information around objective returns - I can think of very large Australian funds which CPI plus 2% as their objective for the last 10 years - and then boast making 10+% returns - all with no regard to the stated objective.

Jack
November 21, 2021

Warren, that's just not correct. Take the biggest super fund in the country. Its super projection retirement calculator has not changed for years https://www.australiansuper.com/tools-and-advice/calculators/super-projection-calculator and still has, for example, for a moderate portfolio return of 6.5%. So where is that coming from with 0% from defensive? ... 13% from growth? That's moderate, nothing in there about taking more risk to achieve returns.

Warren Bird
November 22, 2021

David M and Jack, I beg to differ. Data that Morningstar and other professional research groups have prepared show that all super funds review their objectives regularly, and that at least since 2016 the majority have reduced their plan target returns.
The large super fund on whose investment committee I've served for 8 years has done so.
Upon what facts are your views based? How many super fund Board or Investment Committee meetings have you participated in to have formed a contrary view? Picking one fund that hasn't changed their return (so you say) is not enough to justify you insulting a whole industry of professionals and governance bodies!

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Three all-time best tables for every adviser and investor

Is crypto a currency or a collectible?

In investing, patience is more than a virtue

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Stop treating the family home as a retirement sacred cow

The way home ownership relates to retirement income is rated a 'D', as in Distortion, Decumulation and Denial. For many, their home is their largest asset but it's least likely to be used for retirement income.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 433 with weekend update

There’s this story about a group of US Air Force generals in World War II who try to figure out ways to protect fighter bombers (and their crew) by examining the location of bullet holes on returning planes. Mapping the location of these holes, the generals quickly come to the conclusion that the areas with the most holes should be prioritised for additional armour.

  • 11 November 2021

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 431 with weekend update

House prices have risen at the fastest pace for 33 years, but what actually happened in 1988, and why is 2021 different? Here's a clue: the stockmarket crashed 50% between September and November 1987. Looking ahead, where did house prices head in the following years, 1989 to 1991?

  • 28 October 2021

Why has Australia slipped down the global super ranks?

Australia appears to be slipping from the pantheon of global superstar pension systems, with a recent report placing us sixth. A review of an earlier report, which had Australia in bronze position, points to some reasons why, and what might need to happen to regain our former glory.

How to help people with retirement spending decisions

Super funds will soon be required to offer retirement income strategies for members in decumulation. With uncertain returns, uncertain timelines, and different goals, it's possibly “the hardest, nastiest problem in finance".

Tips when taking large withdrawals from super

You want to take a lump sum from your super, but what's the best way? Should it come from you or your spouse, or the pension or accumulation account. There is a welcome flexibility to select the best outcome.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Charlie Munger and stock picks at the Sohn Conference

The Sohn Australia Conference brings together leading fund managers to chose their highest conviction stock in a 10-minute pitch. Here are their 2021 selections with Charlie Munger's wisdom as the star feature.

Interviews

John Woods on diversification using asset allocation

All fund managers now claim to take ESG factors into account, but a multi-asset ethical fund will look quite different from a mainstream fund. Faced with low fixed income returns, alternatives have a bigger role.

SMSF strategies

Don't believe the SMSF statistics on investment allocation

The ATO's data on SMSF asset allocation is as much as 27 months out-of-date and categories such as cash and global investments are reported incorrectly. We should question the motives of some who quote the numbers.

Investment strategies

Highlights of reader tips for young investors

In this second part on the reader responses with advice to younger people, we have selected a dozen highlights, but there are so many quality contributions that a full list of comments is also attached.

Investment strategies

Four climate themes offer investors the next big thing

Climate-related companies will experience exponential growth driven by consumer demand and government action. Investors who identify the right companies will benefit from four themes which will last decades.

Investment strategies

Inflation remains transitory due to strong long-term trends

There is momentum to stop calling inflation 'transitory' but this overlooks deep-seated trends. A longer-term view will see companies like ARB, Reece, Macquarie Telecom and CSL more valuable in a decade.

Infrastructure

Infrastructure and the road to recovery

Infrastructure assets experienced varying fortunes during the pandemic, from less travel at airports to strong activity in communications. On the road to recovery, what role does infrastructure play in a portfolio?

Economy

The three prices that everyone should worry about

Among the myriad of numbers that bombard us every day, three prices matter greatly to the world economy. Recent changes in these prices help to understand the potential for a global recovery and interest rates.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.