Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 582

Survive the next crash by learning from the Stoics

The ancient Stoic philosophers introduced me to an idea they called “premeditatio malorum”—the premeditation of evils.

It’s a practice that involves considering some of the worst things that can possibly happen to you, as a way of immunising yourself against them. To many, this concept might seem somewhat odd and quite grim, but if the Stoic philosophy appeals as much to you as it does to me, you can see the value in it.

In fact, the idea of premeditatio malorum is rooted in our religious and cultural traditions. From the ancient Bhutanese folk saying “to be a happy person, one must contemplate death five times daily” to the writings of St. John Climacus (“The remembrance of death, like all other blessings, is a gift of God”), spiritual wisdom reminds us to keep in our minds that our time on earth is temporary and fleeting.

Paradoxically, this practice can actually make us happier.

Remembering that you could lose your job makes you appreciate those administrative tasks you can’t stand. Being thankful for your health and the use of your limbs makes it hard to complain about all that yard work you need to get done. And recalling the mortality of your loved ones will have you treasuring every routine moment with them, and hugging them a little tighter.

It’s a useful practice.

Now we’re going to apply it to your investment portfolio.

At the start of almost any financial advisory relationship, you will work through a questionnaire that outlines your attitude towards risk. “How would you react if your portfolio fell 20%?” is a common question, for example. And “I would hold on or buy more” is a common answer.

The thing is, you have no idea how you would react in that scenario, because it’s presented in such an abstract and soulless way.

In more vivid and personal terms, one might phrase it as follows:

You have worked your whole life and have finally sold your business for $10 million, after tax. You are ecstatic but also worried about what the future holds. You’ve never had responsibility for so much wealth, and you’re not sure if you’re handling it correctly. You hire an advisor recommended by your brother-in-law because he seems knowledgeable. Shortly after he deploys your cash, the market begins to decline. Your $10 million is now $9.5 million. “Don’t worry,” says your brother-in-law’s advisor, “this is a healthy correction.” This does not feel healthy at all, but you assume he’s an expert and you trust him. After a brief respite, the market suffers another violent selloff. The newspapers begin talking about a big recession… maybe even another Great Depression scenario. The financial news is filled with talking heads in fancy suits telling you to raise cash and head for the hills. Your $10 million is now $8 million, only a few months after investing. At this rate, your life’s work will be vaporized in a couple of years. You demand another meeting with your brother-in-law’s advisor, who tells you, “This is a healthy correction,” and offers to switch you into a lower-risk fund, maybe to rebalance into bonds. What do you do?

If your answer to this scenario is “hold on or buy more,” you’re a more trusting and patient client than I would ever be.

Premeditatio malorum is about anticipating these events in advance.

That’s a nice portfolio you got there… would you still feel as confident in it if it was down 20% tomorrow?

Why conviction is important

Research firm Dalbar conducts a well-known survey that tracks the difference between market returns and those returns actually experienced by investors. The results are often striking. For example, in 2018 they noted that the average balanced fund portfolio returned 6.8% per year over the twenty-year period from 1998 to 2017. During the same period, the average investor in those same funds experienced a return of 2.6%.

How is that possible? Because investors buy when prices are high and the news is positive, and sell when prices are low and the news is negative. In doing so, they ensure they will earn poor returns.

Many advisors use this data to prove to clients that they should stop trying to time the markets and instead stick to their investment plan. This is true.

But what if part of the problem causing this was a mismatch between the investor and their portfolio?

What if part of the reason they were selling is because they never really believed in their investment strategy to begin with?

A well-known example is that of Ken Heebner’s CGM Focus Fund, the best-performing mutual fund of the first decade of the 2000s. The ten-year annualized return was an impressive 18.2%. In 2007 alone, the fund was up 80%, attracting $2.6 billion of assets the following year.

And then… the housing crash. The mortgage and banking crisis. The Great Recession. Immediately following a huge inflow of investor dollars, the fund declined 48%.

The money came in when the numbers were hot. But the investors didn’t have conviction in Heebner or his strategy. They were just chasing returns. And so despite the fund having the best returns of any fund in the decade, investors performed horribly. According to Morningstar, the average investor in CGM Focus experienced a loss of 11% annually over the same time period that the manager made 18% per year.

A more recent example of this phenomenon are the terrible returns experienced by investors in the famous ‘ARK Innovation Fund’. I’ve talked about that enough and won’t revisit it here.

These are great examples of why it’s important to avoid chasing returns. Know why you’re making an investment. Understand the strategy and have conviction in it. Because if you’re just chasing returns, you’re going to bail when things get rough.

Premeditatio malorum is important because it’s a way to test for conviction. And conviction is the key to investing successfully through downturns.

The long-term trend in the markets, as in the economy, is up. Believing this is a necessary prerequisite to investing in stocks. We all know what we need to do when the market corrects. When we’re facing a recession scenario, or a financial crisis. When everyone else is panicking and selling. We need to buy.

But human nature tells us that we’ll feel so much more comfortable running with the herd. And if the herd is selling, we also want to sell.

We will sell, even though we know it’s the wrong thing to do in the long run, because it will alleviate our pain in the short run.

So what do we need in order to prevent ourselves from selling at the bottom? I’ll take it a step further—what do we need in order to buy more at the bottom?

The magic ingredient is conviction. Conviction means that you have a firm belief in what you own or in the strategy being implemented by your money manager. It means that you won’t be tempted to sell when the market drops temporarily, no matter how violent the selloff. In fact, it means that when that happens, you’ll actually be tempted to buy more.

I’m not talking about blind faith. I’m talking about having a solid understanding of what you own. Confidence backed by objective facts, not predictions of what other investors will do.

 

Geoff Saab is the author of Low Risk Rules: A Wealth Preservation Manifesto, and writes a free newsletter at lowriskrules.substack.com.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Picking winners: the origins of the specious

Unpacking investment risk in superannuation

Improving financial literacy for women is a necessity

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Latest Updates

Planning

Will young Australians be better off than their parents?

For much of Australia’s history, each new generation has been better off than the last: better jobs and incomes as well as improved living standards. A new report assesses whether this time may be different.

Superannuation

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Investment strategies

A steady road to getting rich

The latest lists of Australia’s wealthiest individuals show that while overall wealth has continued to rise, gains by individuals haven't been uniform. Many might have been better off adopting a simpler investment strategy.

Economy

Would a corporate tax cut boost productivity in Australia?

As inflation eases, the Albanese government is switching its focus to lifting Australia’s sluggish productivity. Can corporate tax cuts reboot growth - or are we chasing a theory that doesn’t quite work here?

Are V-shaped market recoveries becoming more frequent?

April’s sharp rebound may feel familiar, but are V-shaped recoveries really more common in the post-COVID world? A look at market history suggests otherwise and hints that a common bias might be skewing perceptions.

Investment strategies

Asset allocation in a world of riskier developed markets

Old distinctions between developed and emerging market bonds no longer hold true. At a time where true diversification matters more than ever, this has big ramifications for the way that portfolios should be constructed.

Investment strategies

Top 5 investment reads

As the July school holiday break nears, here are some investment classics to put onto your reading list. The books offer lessons in investment strategy, financial disasters, and mergers and acquisitions.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.