Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 623

The best way to get rich and retire early

Recently I got this question from a reader: “I’m 25 and am wondering whether shares are the best avenue to getting rich enough to retire early.” My answer was “no” and here I’ll elaborate on the reasons why.

First, let’s run through how much money you need to retire early. If you ask 100 different people, you’re likely to get 100 different answers on this issue. Here’s my take on it.

My definition of ‘rich’ is this: having enough that you don’t have to worry about money. You are free not to work and do with your time as you wish. You can go on nice holidays when you like. You can live comfortably and say yes and no to things as you please.

Others may think of being rich differently. They may want a mansion. Or the latest Ferrari. Or own a yacht and spend six months living on it in the south of France each year.

Taking my definition of being able to live comfortably and not worry about money, how much would you need to retire early?

I ran a lot of numbers on this but it’s more complex than you might think. It depends on your time frame, circumstances, location, needs, and the time value of money.

To give you some idea though, a Praemium and Investment Trends report found that there are 690,000 high-net-worth individuals in Australia – defined as those who have at least $1 million in investable assets, clear of debt and excluding their own home, business, and super (but including SMSF assets).

The issue is, this is in today’s dollars. Let’s say our 25-year-old reader at the top of the article wants to retire at age 50. They’ll need more than $1 million in investable assets by the time they retire as today’s money buys less in future. Assume that inflation averages 2.5% over the next 25 years, the reader would need the equivalent of $1.85 million by the time they retire.

That’s not including owning a home. The median house price in Australia is just above $1 million. Assume that by the time the reader retires, house prices go up 5% per annum. It would mean the median house would be worth $3.4 million by the time they’re 50 years old.

Add the $1.85 million in investable assets to the $3.4 million required to buy a house debt free and the reader will need $5.25 million by the time they’d like to retire.

These are ballpark figures, though they can give you a rough guide for what kind of numbers are required to become rich and retire early.

It leads to the next question of the best ways to make enough money to fund an early retirement. For most of you, you’re not going to get there by working nine to five. You might – but you’d be in a distinct minority.

Most people must find other ways to make enough to retire early.

Can shares make it happen?

I’ve worked in equities in different capacities for a few decades and have a natural bias towards them. However, even I think that shares alone can’t make you rich in a relatively short space of time. That’s because shares work best over very long time frames that allow for compounding to work its magic.

Let’s run some numbers. Say you have an iron will to get rich and retire early, and you put $20,000 of savings into the share market each year for 25 years. Let’s assume that you put that annual $20,000 into an ASX 200 ETF that will earn 9% per annum. Can shares get you to an early retirement?

That’s doubtful because it would only get you to $1.7 million in total assets in 25 years’ time.

Of course, if you can earn more than the average broad market share ETF, then you can speed up the journey to early retirement. Doing this requires skill, possibly taking on more risk, and undoubtedly having some luck. I recently wrote of 9 common investment strategies used to beat the market.

However, shares alone aren’t likely to get you to an early retirement.

How about property investment?

Given residential property has returned close to 10% per annum for decades, surely investing in real estate with leverage can get you to an early retirement. I’m going to take the contrarian view that residential property could be one of the poorest returning asset classes in future decades and one of the least likely to get you to your ‘early retirement number’.

Why do I say this? Because housing is already so unaffordable and Australians are so indebted that it is going to cap any increase in prices. I think it’s part of the reason that despite recent interest rate cuts, property prices aren’t bouncing hard. And it may also be why rental price growth is tepid despite rental vacancies being near decades-long lows.

Basic math supports the argument for tepid growth ahead. If we assume that wages increase by 3% per annum over the next 25 years, it would be optimistic to believe that house prices will increase by +5% a year. It would mean the national house price to income ratio of 9.7x – already the second highest in the world – increasing further from here.

With pathetic rental yields and the prospect of low capital returns, I can’t see many people retiring early via residential property investments. What was once a sure thing is now anything but.

Of course, there are other forms of property investment – retail, office, industrial, storage, healthcare and so on. Some of these have potential though you’ll need a lot of upfront capital and the skills to make it work.

What about having your own business?

This gets us to what I consider the best way to earn enough to retire early: having equity in a business (hopefully 100%).

Take a look at this list of the world’s richest people:

1. Elon Musk – US$401 billion
2. Larry Ellison – US$300 billion
3. Mark Zuckerberg – US$267 billion
4. Jeff Bezos – US$246 billion
5. Larry Page – US$158 billion

6. Jensen Huang – US$155 billion
7. Sergey Brin – US$151 billion
8. Steve Ballmer – US$149 billion
9. Warren Buffett – US$144 billion
10. Bernard Arnault – US$143 billion

Note: as at August 1. Source: Forbes

What do you see on this list, besides a lot of money and egos? What these ten people have in common is that all of them own equity in a business or businesses. That’s how they’ve generated their wealth.

The same goes for the top 10 wealthiest people in Australia:

1. Gina Rinehart – A$29 billion
2. Harry Triguboff – A$19 billion
3. Mike Cannon-Brookes – A$18 billion
4. Scott Farquhar – A$18 billion
5. Andrew Forrest and family – A$16 billion

6. Cliff Obrecht and Melanie Perkins – A$12 billion
7. Richard White – A$10 billion
8. Anthony Pratt – A$9 billion
9. Bianca Rinehart and siblings – A$8 billion
10. Frank Lowy – A$8 billion

Note: as of February 2025. Source: AFR.

The downside of owning a business is that it involves taking outsized risks compared to investing in shares and property. After all, 20% of new businesses fail in the first year in Australia, and 60% of them are gone after year three.

Because of this, it’s much easier to own a business when you’re young and broke than when you’re older and married with three kids.

Put simply, while business ownership is the best way to retire early, it isn’t for the faint hearted.

Are there other ways to get rich?

I’ve gone through the three main ways to get rich enough to retire early. It doesn’t mean you have to do one of these exclusively. You could have your own business and invest excess cash in shares and property. Or you could have a good-paying job, have a side hustle, and invest spare cash in the stock market.

And potential investments aren’t just confined to shares and property. For instance, there are alternative assets like hedge funds, private equity, and venture capital that can offer the potential for decent returns.

It requires a certain mindset

While the means of getting rich and retiring early are important, just as crucial is the mindset to reach your financial goals. Being in the finance industry, I’ve known wealthy individuals. If I had to narrow down the two most important qualities that these people share, it would be these:

  1. A singular focus on getting rich
  2. A willingness to take risks, often large ones

A lot of people say they want to be rich and retire early but they don’t really mean it. That’s because they don’t have the relentless focus that’s required to make money. The rich that I know are obsessed with making money and the best means to do so. It’s all they think about 24/7, often to the detriment of everything else, including their families.

The second point is that the rich aren’t afraid to make outsized bets on things. They have little fear of failure. Their attitude seems to be that they can always come back after a fall.

That’s not normal. Most people are risk averse and are unwilling to make one bold move, let alone many of them.

In sum, before you embark on the journey to get rich and retire early, you need to look earnestly in the mirror and decide whether you have what it takes to make it happen.

 

James Gruber is Editor of Firstlinks.

 

54 Comments
Alan
August 15, 2025

Start with a savings mindset whilst a young adult and then develop that into an investing mindset as your income and savings grow.
Be prepared to invest in growth assets ( which specific type is less critical but be sure to diversify).
Be persistent over 20-30 years to see through your plan.
Be courageous if business opportunities present
Be aware of the tax outcomes of various investments so as to keep those in Canberra out of your back pocket as much as possible.
You'll be rewarded by the accumulation of wealth and the sense of freedom that attaches to it.

Murray McLean
August 11, 2025

To achieve better outcomes, I suggest you and your Life partner go to www.mylongevity.com.au and complete your individual SHAPE analyser questionnaire, then compare your respective Longevity Plan results, paying particular attention to the comparison between each of your longevity stages numbers, i.e., Active, Less Active, and Passive years.
Having made that assessment you will be better prepared to combine any 'money' considerations and variables to match more realistically to your desired life journey.

TheMiddlebit!
August 11, 2025

Some great experience talking above. What I do not see reference too is managing tax.... if you do not have the bank of mum n dad to step forward with maximising (keeping) your 'hard' earned is critical... in my humble opinion.

Peter Care
August 10, 2025

I assume that $1 million dollars is US dollars, because that is the amount of investable assets generally considered to be classed as wealthy?

That still should be achievable for a young person today on a decent wage or business income, as long as they live modestly, track their expenditure and invest in growth assets.

Most people don’t reach it because they spend too much over their lifetime.

CC
August 11, 2025

maybe, but do we really want to live modestly during our active years and wait until we are old cripples before we can spend money ?

Disgruntled
August 12, 2025

Do we want to live like we will die at 55 and live longer, be infirm and not have any money because we lived longer than we thought?

I know which I'd prefer, statistically and genetically barring accidental death, I'll likely live to late 80's or early 90's

Life expectancy for most in the Western World is into the 80's year age range.

Many comments on saving, Superannuation and retirement write ups always have the pessimistic, ludicrous view point, Why should I bother saving for the future, I could die tomorrow? Yes, you could, the odds are you won't.

If there is family history of dying younger, then yes, swinging the scales more towards life enjoyment makes sense.

If family history leans towards longer longevity then the scales swing towards more of providing for your future as well.

Live long and healthy, having money to pursue interests, hobbies time with family and friends

Live long and not so healthy? Having money to have better care provided for you has to be better than having no money.

Rick D
August 10, 2025

Yes, exactly Wildcat. I have been running such examples past people for decades and in most cases getting blank looks. There are no capital expenses or costs, which are significant, allowed for in the so-called property market returns. The Real Estate Industry hype is well and truly entrenched in the Australian psyche.

Peter Caloiero
August 10, 2025

Good luck with wanting that latest Ferrari. You can’t just walk off the street with enough cash seeking to buy the latest Ferrari. Ferrari won’t sell a new one to you. You have to earn the right to be a Ferrari owner, by having a second hand one for a few years. Ferrari wants to make sure you are the type of owner that is suitable to drive their car, which is why they make you wait for that Ferrari.

Lamborghini. on the other hand is not so fussy. That’s why you are more likely to see your local organised crime boss drive a Lamborghini, rather than a Ferrari,

Graham
August 10, 2025

Firstly, gearing into shares is far safer than into property as you can start small and there are no huge buying and selling costs. A parcel can be sold to meet a margin call if no other funds are available. You can also minimise CGT by realizing profits over time. Regarding businesses failing after a short time, that is far too generalist. As an accountant I saw few businesses fail when they were "selling their time". Tradies, professionals, hairdressers etc seldom failed as the capital required was not great. Businesses requiring a lot of stock and/or equipment were the most likely to fail. Worth an article in my opinion.

Jack
August 10, 2025

The big difference is the fact that banks are prepared to lend much more on property on a small deposit. That increases the gearing which increases the potential capital gain and the risk of loss.

Using home equity, which is a loan against property, to gear into shares is much safer again than a margin loan, because there are no margin calls. The franking credits associated with shares also need to be factored into the investment return equation.

Charlie
August 10, 2025

In old chinese wisdom, there are 3 pillars of "wealth":

- Financial security gained by stable income or not excessive spending.
- Health: your body and mind are one. You need to live a healthy life based on a balanced diet, regular exercise and meditation to keep your inner "Chi" at its best state for as long as possible.
- Agency: we (as humans) are not born to be lonely. We are at our best when we (friends, family, neighbours) are united and live in harmony so that we can be prosper for many years to come.

Enjoy your day James.

Ross Le Bris
August 11, 2025

Your comments are right on the money. The notion of wealth is being comfortably satisfied with what you have, healthy, and preferably not alone. All else is excess.

chriso
August 08, 2025

health, wealth and happiness

Dudley
August 08, 2025

"For most of you, you’re not going to get there by working nine to five. You might – but you’d be in a distinct minority.":

How it is won at least risk, least retail 'deprivation':

Save 80% of after tax income by minimising expenses (Bunk of Dad&Mum for some).
Buy home with cash on knocker after about 4 years.
That avoids the financial drag of rent and mort-gage.

Continue to save X% of after tax income - for retirement (at 55 is better).

Tax rate (base rate company for simplicity) 25%, bank deposit interest 5% / y, inflation 2.5% / y, to 50 y, from 25 y, portion of after tax income saved X%:

Accumulating, saving X%:
Future Value (real) as multiple of after tax income at commencement of retirement:
= FV((1 + (1 - 25%) * 5%) / (1 + 2.5%) - 1, (50 - 25), X% * -1, 0)
= 15.11

Disbursing, spend (1 - X%):
Present Value (real) as multiple of after tax income at commencement of retirement:
= PV((1 + (1 - 25%) * 5%) / (1 + 2.5%) - 1, (90 - 50), (1 - X%) * 1, 0)
= 15.11

Find amount to save, X%, and spend (1 - X%), by varying X% until amount in Accumulation fund = amount Disbursement fund:
= 52%

Adam
August 10, 2025

If the 20 yo thinks that money is the most important thing, they are doomed

Dudley
August 10, 2025

"20 yo":

Most currently can not think seriously about money because they are 'money innumerate' and, additionally, have not acquired 'money fitness' by earning and paying their own way - Dad&Mum are still paying or guaranteeing their expenses.

Peter
August 08, 2025

It is certainly possible to retire early it's just a matter of good asset allocation. I am in my mid thirties and according to your definition I would be a "high net worth individual". I have done this by living in a multigeneration household which has meant that much of my income has been invested and not spent on expensive housing. I anticipate I could retire in 10 to 15 years time. Further, I think many millenials will probably been in a postion to retire early due to inheritances or other intergenaration wealth transfers. Retiring early is a real prospect for many.

Peter Care
August 11, 2025

I doubt many millenials will retire early. They spend too much money on useless things such as tattoos, drugs, gambling and expensive home delivered meals.

When baby boomers, who own most of the assets pass away in their 80’s and 90’s, their assets will go to their Gen X children in the 50’s and sixties. Millenials won’t get the assets until they are in their 60’s and ready to retire themselves. As a consequence of baby boomers living to a ripe old age, Millenials will work into their senior years if they are relying on an inheritance to retire.

BeenThereB4
August 08, 2025

What is so great about retiring early?

At age 80 years I retired last year. I enjoyed working and relationships with clients. If your occupation is rewarding to you and your customers, keep at it.

IZ
August 08, 2025

Work is so much better when you don't need the money. Retire early doesn't necessarily mean you stop working, it gives you the freedom to say no and sometimes yes to things and people.

Ian Ross
August 08, 2025

It's not really about retiring early, it's about being financially independent, which gives you options you don't otherwise have. You can choose to retire if you want, or keep working at whatever it is you want to do. The point is that financial independence gives you choices to do what pleases you.

Disgruntled
August 12, 2025

What is so great about retiring early?

Not having to get up and go to work every morning, that's what.

We are dead too long to keep working until we die or unable to work anymore because of age related injury or illness.

I've met so many older people that regret not retiring earlier than they did because they thought they couldn't afford to retire. Far more than I've met that have said they are glad they kept working.

Divorce set back my retirement plans, along with changes to Superannuation Rules along the way.

I'm 60 soon and will retire then. Would have semi retired on a Transition to Retirement Plan at 55 but that was changed to 60. Could have retired to Thailand on a retirement Visa at 50 but the rules on taking all your Superannuation with you if you were leaving the country were killed off in 2006/2007

James#
August 12, 2025

"What is so great about retiring early?"

Inane arguments abound! It's your life; do with it what suits you.
If you can afford to retire early and spend what remains of life on individual pursuits, go for it.
If working makes you happy and is fulfilling, so be it.
Pointless to suggest what suits one is a panacea for all.

Of course the government would like you to keep working until you drop dead. But then one would be silly to listen to government, wouldn't one?

Lisa
August 07, 2025

Found it amusing that the survey didn't include superannuation (only SMSF) guess financial advisors don't really have the opportunity to make coin on it. Have to say that superannuation would have to be one of the safest and tax advantaged strategies out there.

Matt
August 10, 2025

You just can’t access it until you’re 60. That’s not exactly “retire early”

Harry
August 10, 2025

Yes but you use other sources till 60 then the super is accessible. Many strategies available.

Kevin
August 07, 2025

People like complication,I don't know why.The price of a good second hand car can make you wealthy.People see what they want to see and hear what they want to hear.

12K( 6K each). to buy 1,000 shares in CBA and NAB.Give or take $500. Now worth ~ $1.5 million if you reinvested the dividends. A 125 X return. All I had to do was listen to people repeating over and over ,you can't do that,those companies are going bust.

Save up as much money as you can,do this,do that,do the other,everybody in the pub said, etc etc etc. Hopefully I 'll still be alive in 2041 to see how things went after 50 years of people repeating you can't do that. Wether I'll still be playing with a full deck of cards or not I don't know. Perhaps just settle for 40 years of people telling me you can't do that.

Anybody got a house that is worth 125x what they paid for it in 1991.Those very high holding costs,rates,insurance, repairs and so many other things.

Kevin
August 08, 2025

While people deny that for the whole of their lives,they will also deny it across generations,forever ! They put a lot of work and complex nonsense into avoiding wealth and making up their own facts. That has amazed me for decades.

Wildcat
August 10, 2025

NAB shares have been worth roughly the same for 20 years or more. They have essentially been a glorified term deposit (dividends) with share market risk. Risk/return tradeoff is awful = poor investment. CBA is different.

Bit like saying my house in Sydney is an awesome investment. Made 350-400% so far. Only 6% really (yes I’ve been here a while). This is NOT allowing for stamp duty, agents fees if I sold now, $100k’s of renovation and repair costs not the interest paid. After those expenses probably only 3.5-4%. Not a terrible investment, not the lay down misere everyone thinks resi property is either.

When analysing investments proper dispassionate assessment is harder than it looks sometimes.

Dudley
August 10, 2025

"When analysing investments proper dispassionate assessment is harder than it looks sometimes.":

Accurately predicting being the future being the hard part.

Revisiting the past total return has been made easier:
https://www.marketindex.com.au/asx/nab/advanced-chart

Kevin
August 10, 2025

People make up their own nonsense and invent their own facts. It isn't a bit like anything or a look over there instead of focus on the facts.
30/6/2005
ANZ $21.75
CBA$37.87
NAB $30.76
WBC 19.85.
That's exactly what it was like,not a bit like this that or the other.People were saying exactly the same you can't do that,repeat that every day.

Since then the shareholdings are all around 5x more..You work it out,I owned more than 1,000 shares in each of those companies then.Work out what 5,000 shares in each of those companies are worth now to make it easy. The increase in shareholding is through capital raisings and using the DRP,

It is exactly like being out there in the centre of the pitch playing the game . It is exactly like listening to spectators and "expert commentators" believing their own nonsense and their own facts.
20 years of these experts saying you can't do that. The next 20 years will be exactly the same. .The same experts fooling themselves what they have made up is real.

See what the dividend income looks like over the next 20 years,see if you can live off it along with money from super.They'll still be denying it and they still be making up their own facts and saying don't focus,look over there instead.

Pice info is from margin loan statements on 30/6 /2005.

Mark
August 07, 2025

James, another very good article and the comments too are thought-provoking, however, you ignored the most important way to get wealthy and retire "early"; invest in your human capital.

Invest in your human capital, work hard, and save. Yes, then you can apply the sage words about investment.

Alternatively, and whilst sexist, you can observe it happening all too readily; be born an attractive female, hang out where wealthy men hang out, and wear a skimpy bikini (sadly, you can buy books that recommend this strategy to young women).

Lisa Romano
August 07, 2025

Hi James, Ireally appreciate your views. I definitely fall into your "more than one" investment approach, having reached "FIRE" (financial independence retire early) aged 50 via: 25 years in my own business and using my 30s decade to buy shares, start my SMSF and acquire leveraged property investments. However, it's also important to know when debt is your friend and when it's time to cash in your chips and consolidate. It is in my view vital to avoid going into retirement while still in debt.

Luke
August 07, 2025

As a former accountant and financial advisor for 15 years I've seen significant wealth generated through business, shares, property. I've seen wealth destroyed when property assets are overloaded and negative gearing taken too far at the pursuit of paying no tax. My own journey consists of a residential home, farmland and index funds . The net cashflow from a diversified portfolio of shares is hard to beat when funding a lifestyle or buying other assets, same with commercial real estate. Barring an inheritance or head start, gearing is often needed at the start to get the asset snowball rolling.
Index funds are hard to beat for the average punter invested over a period of decades. I've started My own son at 17 on this journey.
The big mistake I see is young people chewing up their borrowing capacity and cashflow through massive residential mortgages. Unless your in a capital city these are often a forced savings plan at best if the loan is taken over 30 years, paying off multiples of the original loan in interest. In my experience, a singular focus is needed to build wealth at an early age, with the ability then to take the foot off the gas once an asset base is built. Debt reduction and inflation then do the rest for investors.

Tom
August 07, 2025

Agree with the comments.
As someone who has pursued the 'own business' path for the last 10 years and am now in a position where I can retire, it is a path that I'm not sure I would recommend. It is all-consuming, always-on and relentless.
It's hard to overstate the relentless nature of being fully consumed, particularly mentally as uncertainty dominates.
It's certainly not for many, and I'd recommend against it for most.

Edward
August 07, 2025

As an accountant I have seen many clients become 'rich' through property. What you don't mention is that property can be geared (not necessarily negative gearing though, that is mostly overrated), unlike shares. Borrowing against shares is subject to margin calls and inherently very risky. Gearing against property is low risk and generates outsized increases in your total asset value. Secondly, property investment, if done wisely and with a good deal of research, is a lot easier than share investing and over time becomes very stable. Whilst beating the share market is very hard, even for professionals, that is not the case for the property market. The 10% annual increase is for the whole property market, which, unlike the share market, includes a very large proportion of properties that can be very easily excluded.
Further, unlike shares, there are opportunities with property beyond simply buy and sell: redevelopment, renovate, sub division and so on, which are not overly complicated.
I wouldn't dismiss property investment. I do agree, though, with 'business': the wealthiest of my clients all owned a business (and invested in property). Perhaps they have been lucky, but mostly they were extremely focussed and worked very, very hard, especially in the early years.

Jon
August 09, 2025

You absolutely can gear in to shares and you do not necessarily need to risk margin calls. As for ‘ease’, buying index funds is about as easy as it gets and there are no tenants or property managers to deal with..

Sean
August 10, 2025

‘Gearing against property is low risk’. I’ve heard it all now.

Chris
August 10, 2025

Not sure I agree, I geared into shares, made some riskier plays into small caps( some failed, some became multi baggers) but only invested a small percentage in these.
The overwhelming portion of my investments were in diversified dividend paying shares and aust and international etfs. I enjoyed average total returns around 8-9% and during market corrections bought as much as I could afford, adding icing to the cake.
I often find accountants have a bias to real estate, and I understand we often do what we know, but I find the ability to buy smaller investment chunks and not have to repair/maintain and take calls from tenants etc swings me into the shares camp.
As for excluding super, decades of salary sacrificing into the wonderfully tax advantaged super system enabled an early retirement to live on external savings and then switching on a very generous tax free “pension”
Many ways to skin the retirement cat, but I agree, there are not many willing to forego today’s consumption for the future.

CC
August 11, 2025

as an investor in both property and shares, I am certain that your claim that property investing is a lot easier than shares is TOTALLY WRONG. There is nothing easier than buying an Index ETF. You don't need to borrow to buy shares as small sums can be added to over time, and I have never borrowed for shares, but how many of us can buy investment property without taking out huge loans ?
Hassles with investment property can be enormous, with ongoing maintenance & repair bills, problems with tenants, agent fees, land taxes, water bills, council rates etc etc . None of these with an Index sharemarket ETF with long term returns of approx 9% p.a plus FRANKING CREDITS.

Frank
August 07, 2025

I'm not quite sure why that $1M excludes super but includes SMSF assets!

Eve
August 07, 2025

Because the people who run that survey are interested in investors. The SMSF trustee has discretion over how they invest their super money, while those with a superfund account have no discretion other than choice of fund.

Frank
August 09, 2025

OK, thanks Eve! But still, surely a person with $10M, say, in a super fund is a high-net-worth individual too?! :-)

Wildcat
August 07, 2025

James, your property number is very misleading but it’s not your fault. 10% for property is wrong. Eg you buy for $1m, renovate for $300k, sell after seven years for $2m. Reported return circa 10% pa. Actual return (assuming renovation done at beginning) circa 6.3%. This NOT allowing for stamp duty and agents fees circa $125k (NSW) and say misc maintenance over 7 years $20k. We are now sub 5% approximately.

There is no allowance in the published real estate numbers for contributed capital for renovations or improvements, transaction costs etc.

People always quote the published real estate return numbers and they complete bunkum.

James Gruber
August 07, 2025

Hi Wildcat,

Yes, all valid points.

James

James#
August 07, 2025

"Wealth consists not in having great possessions, but in having few wants." – Epictetus

OldbutSane
August 08, 2025

Absolutely true and funny there is not much said about having a good saving mindset.

As someone who only ever worked as a salaried employee (on about the average wage) but who saved as much as possible and invested in property, shares and superannuation, I retired at 49, but am still pretty careful about how I spend it.

You don't really need to own a business to retire early (although that is the most likely path to extreme wealth, if that is your goal).

Ramon Vasquez
August 08, 2025

N I C E !!! Regards , Ramon .

Maurie
August 09, 2025

Excellent point James# which had been largely overlooked in the comments section. “Rich” is seemingly based on a number because people need to quantify everything. “Wealth” is a state of mind that can be attained by a combination of few wants and delayed gratification.

Dudley
August 09, 2025

"“Wealth” is a state of mind that can be attained by a combination of few wants and delayed gratification.":

Saving - which requires Income.

AlanB
August 07, 2025

I knew someone rich enough to own a Ferrari. But at age 51 he died of bowel cancer. Our most valuable asset is our health and our next most valuable asset is a reliable stable spouse. If you have good health and a good spouse you're rich. Cherish them.

CC
August 07, 2025

good point !

stephen
August 07, 2025

So true AlanB :)

Disgruntled
August 08, 2025

Life expectancy in the western world is in the 80's

Lifestyle and genetics could mean you live longer, misfortune could mean you don't.

Finding balance in preparing your finances for a longer life but spending some in case it's shorter is the key

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Supercharging the ‘4% rule’ to ensure a richer retirement

A better approach to post-retirement planning

Not all lifecycle funds are created equal

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Which generation had it toughest?

Each generation believes its economic challenges were uniquely tough - but what does the data say? A closer look reveals a more nuanced, complex story behind the generational hardship debate. 

100 Aussies: seven charts on who earns, pays, and owns

The Labor government is talking up tax reform to lift Australia’s ailing economic growth. Before any changes are made, it’s important to know who pays tax, who owns assets, and how much people have in their super for retirement.

The best way to get rich and retire early

This goes through the different options including shares, property and business ownership and declares a winner, as well as outlining the mindset needed to earn enough to never have to work again.

A perfect storm for housing affordability in Australia

Everyone has a theory as to why housing in Australia is so expensive. There are a lot of different factors at play, from skewed migration patterns to banking trends and housing's status as a national obsession.

Chinese steel - building a Sydney Harbour Bridge every 10 minutes

China's steel production, equivalent to building one Sydney Harbour Bridge every 10 minutes, has driven Australia's economic growth. With China's slowdown, what does this mean for Australia's economy and investments?

9 winning investment strategies

There are many ways to invest in stocks, but some strategies are more effective than others. Here are nine tried and tested investment approaches - choosing one of these can improve your chances of reaching your financial goals.

Latest Updates

Retirement

Supercharging the ‘4% rule’ to ensure a richer retirement

The creator of the 4% rule for retirement withdrawals, Bill Bengen, has written a new book outlining fresh strategies to outlive your money, including holding fewer stocks in early retirement before increasing allocations.

Shares

Are franking credits worth pursuing?

Are franking credits factored into share prices? The data suggests they're probably not, and there are certain types of stocks that offer higher franking credits as well as the prospect for higher returns.

Retirement

Inflation cruels a comfortable retirement

ASFA’s latest estimates reveal that home-owning couples need at least $690,000 in super for a ‘comfortable’ retirement, yet only around 30% of people meet these thresholds, and the shortfall may deepen.

Australia’s sleepwalk into a damaged society

The role of family and community as foundations of a healthy society have been allowed to weaken. This has brought about Australia's spiritual decline and a thirst for dopamine that explains our high debt levels.

Investment strategies

The simplicity of this investing method hides its power

Despite the perception that successful investors nimbly navigate each zig and zag in the market, the evidence suggests otherwise. This approach can help an investor avoid self-harming their returns.

Investment strategies

Four ways that global investors are reshaping their US exposure

It wasn't long ago that investors were asking if US exceptionalism could continue. They now appear to be diversifying away from dollar assets and shifting to a more active US equity allocation.

Investment strategies

The case for high yield bonds

This is a primer on high yield bonds - their risk and returns compared to investment grade securities, diversification benefits, and strategies for selecting high yield investments for enhanced portfolio yields.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.